Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 172/2021

Case between Subash vs Nalini regarding eviction and damages.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-09-22
Duration
approximately-5 years 6 days
Case Closed
Mon, 09/22/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Subash and Anil, brothers and plaintiffs, are seeking to evict the defendant Nalini from a shop room and recover damages for unpaid rent. The defendant has failed to vacate despite the expiry of the rental agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, ordering the defendant to vacate the shop room and pay damages for use and occupation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to vacate the plaint schedule shop room and pay Rs. 5,000 as use and occupation charge with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, ordering the defendant to vacate the shop room and pay damages for use and occupation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiffs established their entitlement to vacant possession and damages through unchallenged evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiffs established their entitlement to vacant possession and damages through unchallenged evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Through the unchallenged oral and documentary evidence, plaintiffs have established that they are entitled to get vacant possession of the plaint schedule shop room and also entitled `5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) as the use and occupation charge.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.The defendant is hereby directed to vacate the vacant possession of the plaint schedule shop room within fourteen days from the date of the decree. 2.The plaintiffs are entitled to realize `5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) as the use and occupation charge with 6% interest from the date of suit till realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Subash
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anil
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nalini
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Rent agreement dated 07/08/2019, Copy of lawyer notice dated 09/09/2020, Postal receipt, Postal acknowledgment card.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. R. Haribabu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to vacate the vacant possession of the plaint schedule shop room within fourteen days from the date of the decree.
Evidence:
The defendant is hereby directed to vacate the vacant possession of the plaint schedule shop room within fourteen days from the date of the decree.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiffs are entitled to realize `5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) as the use and occupation charge with 6% interest from the date of suit till realization.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs are entitled to realize `5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) as the use and occupation charge with 6% interest from the date of suit till realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of Rent agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Ext.A1 is rejected since it is a photocopy.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice dated 09.09.2020.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal acknowledgment card.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Subash vs Nalini regarding eviction and damages.
Case Code Year
Case between Subash vs Nalini regarding eviction and damages.

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Wed, 09/22/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/22/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Shaji Sreedharan vs Niyas Shukkoor et al regarding eviction and arrears of rent.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Kerala State Fedaration of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes Development Co-operative Ltd No.4351 vs A.S Girish regarding eviction and recovery of arrears of rent
COURT OF I st ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.B. Ajikumar vs Prem Rishikumaran regarding unlawful eviction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devaswom et al vs Abdul Rahim@ S. Rahim regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.C. Samuel vs S. Xavier regarding arrears of rent and damages
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won