Similar Cases
Based on: ORIGINAL SUIT No. 241/2016 — Case between Sajeev vs Vasantha Kumari et al regarding partition of property
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
Original Suit No. 310/2018
Case between Jacob vs Jetroode regarding declaration of title by adverse possession
Jacob, the plaintiff, is claiming title to a property through adverse possession against his sister, Jetroode, who has made claims over the same property. The dispute arises from historical family possession and alleged title rights.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 328/2018
Case between Sahir M.H. vs Kerala Small Industries Development Corporation Limited regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Sahir M.H. filed a suit against the Kerala Small Industries Development Corporation Limited regarding a dispute about the outright sale and eviction from a shed he rented for his cattle feed production business. The case addresses the plaintiff's rights as a tenant and disputes over the property ownership.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 323/2019
Case between Darsana vs Rajamma et al regarding partition of property
Darsana filed a suit for partition and fixation of boundary regarding her half right over certain properties. The defendants include her mother-in-law Rajamma and her brother-in-law Vijayakumar, who contest her claims based on prior family agreements.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 160/2022
Case between Vilambhagam Plavazhikam Residents Association vs Sasikumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs are the Vilambhagam Plavazhikam Residents Association and its secretary, Salim. They are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants who allegedly conducted an illegal annual general body meeting and made unauthorized decisions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1295/2023
Case between Aravindan Nair et al vs Ramachandran Nair et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, who are siblings, sought a partition of property from the defendants, also siblings, after the death of their sister. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants were obstructing their rights to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.994/2022
Case between Thulaseedharan.B. vs Bindu et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
The petitioner, Thulaseedharan.B., filed a petition for a temporary prohibitory injunction against defendants Bindu and Geetha regarding an alleged trespass on his property. The case revolves around property ownership disputes and the right to construct on adjacent lands.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.138 /2019
Case between Syed Mohammed Sadik vs Suresh Babu. R.C regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.
Syed Mohammed Sadik and Suresh Babu. R.C are involved in two interconnected suits regarding property disputes over a pathway. The plaintiff claims that the defendant illegally encroached upon the pathway, reducing its width.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.427/2021
Case between Rajesh Balakrishnan vs Sunitha Sundar et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Rajesh Balakrishnan, the plaintiff, seeks partition of property and injunction against his sister, her husband, and his mother. The dispute revolves around property inherited from their father.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.783/2020
Case between Gladstone.D et al vs Lilibai et al regarding partition and injunction.
The plaintiffs, descendants of Sri. Daveed, sought partition of a property after his death. The defendants, descendants of another legal heir, challenged the plaintiffs' claims, leading to a legal dispute over property ownership and injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.1196/2012
Case between Aloysius E.Gomez et al vs Maglin Lobo regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Aloysius E. Gomez and his wife Mary Lobo filed a suit against Maglin Lobo regarding obstruction in a public pathway. The plaintiffs sought a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendant from constructing a roof over a portion of the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.48/2025
Case between Govind.D.C vs Adhul et al regarding trespassing and injunction
Govind.D.C, the plaintiff, is seeking an injunction against Adhul, Salim, and the BCG Horizon Association to prevent them from trespassing into his property. The defendants claim the right to the common areas as a registered association.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.475/2021
Case between Vinod S Nair vs Sini Shafeekh et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Vinod S Nair, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Sini Shafeekh and others regarding the possession of a vehicle and allegations of fraud. The plaintiff claimed that he is entitled to possess a vehicle due to an agreement with the defendants, while the defendants denied any such agreement and raised various counterclaims.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1236/2020
Case between Divya Kumar.P vs Peethambaran et al regarding recovery of possession and mesne profits.
Divya Kumar.P is seeking recovery of possession of her property from her parents and sister, who are currently residing there. The plaintiff contends that the defendants are in illegal possession and has filed this suit after her attempts to evict them were unsuccessful.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.387/2021
Case between Saji David vs Shibu David regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Saji David filed a suit against his brother Shibu David for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The dispute arose over a property partitioned between them after their mother's death, with the plaintiff claiming the defendant is obstructing his possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.221/2023
Case between N.M.R Siraj et al vs Dr.S.Jaseem et al regarding partition
The plaintiffs, N.M.R Siraj and Dr.Mehana Siraj, filed a suit for partition against the defendants, who are their siblings. The case is about dividing the properties of their deceased parents according to the rules of intestate succession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.658/2019
Case between Shaji P.R vs Rajani regarding removal of encroachment and restoration of pathway
Shaji P.R filed a suit against his sister Rajani for the removal of an encroachment and restoration of a pathway that provides access to his property. The defendant allegedly constructed a wall blocking the pathway, which the plaintiff claims has caused him hardship.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.240/2023
Case between Sree Narayana Bhaktha Janasamithi et al vs Sreekumar. S et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves the Sree Narayana Bhaktha Janasamithi and its president Jagannathan against defendants Sreekumar. S and Rejith.S. The plaintiffs sought a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from interfering with the administration and renovation works of a family temple.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.476/2021
Case between Dayanandan vs Anila Kumari et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Dayanandan, the absolute owner of a property, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against his sisters and nephew who attempted to trespass onto his property. The court found that the plaintiff was not entitled to relief due to suppression of facts.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1256/2020
Case between Santhamma.S vs K. Sasidharan Nair regarding partition of property
Santhamma.S, the plaintiff, is the widow of Late Sri. Kesava Pillai @ Kesavan Nair and is seeking a partition of property she shares with her son, K. Sasidharan Nair, the defendant. The plaintiff claims rights to a larger share of the property but the court found her claims insufficient due to lack of critical documentation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1563/2024
Case between T.S. Jayaprakash vs M/s Adrak Builders& Developers Pvt. LTD. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
T.S. Jayaprakash, the plaintiff, claims that M/s Adrak Builders& Developers Pvt. LTD. has unlawfully grabbed his property. The case involves determining the rights over certain properties and includes applications for the appointment of a commissioner and surveyor.
Civil Suit
O.S. No. 673/2021
Case between M.Subhash Babu et al vs Suresh Babu et al regarding boundary, prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.
The plaintiffs, M.Subhash Babu and E.K.Madhavan Nair Family Trust, filed a suit against the defendants, Suresh Babu and Bindhu.V., to prevent alleged trespassing on property held by the trust. The plaintiffs claim they are protecting their rights against attempts to encroach and claim compensation unfairly from land acquisition authorities.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.160/2023
Case between M/s. Attukal Shopping Complex Pvt. Ltd vs City Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs.
M/s. Attukal Shopping Complex Pvt. Ltd filed a suit against the City Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram seeking a permanent injunction. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant is wrongfully renewing D&O licenses for former licensees without the required consent after termination of their licenses.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1677/2013
Case between Surendran Nair vs S. Jayakumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and setting aside a Will
The case involves Surendran Nair as the plaintiff, who claims ownership of property based on a Will executed by Smt. Rajamma. The defendants, including S. Jayakumar and others, are contesting the validity of the Will and asserting their own rights over the property, alleging fraud and undue influence.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1677/2013
Case between Surendran Nair vs S. Jayakumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and setting aside a Will
Surendran Nair is the plaintiff in a suit against S. Jayakumar and others, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction and claiming ownership of a property by virtue of a Will executed in his favor. The defendants are contesting the validity of the Will and claiming rights over the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.1397/2025
Case between Bernadine Narcisus Silva @ B.N. Silva vs Rajendra Rao regarding Sale Deed dispute
The plaintiff, Bernadine Narcisus Silva, seeks to nullify a Sale Deed claimed to be obtained fraudulently by the defendant, Rajendra Rao. The plaintiff alleges that despite agreeing to sell his property, the defendant deceived him, resulting in a void sale.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.2384/2014
Case between Shibu et al vs Bindhu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and other consequential reliefs.
The plaintiffs, Shibu and Sekharan, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Bindhu, Biju, and Thankamoni, concerning a dispute over property access and construction. The case also has a counterclaim where Bindhu, the plaintiff in the second suit, contends against Shibu and Sekharan regarding property declaration and injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.253/2022
Case between Sreeletha.S et al vs Muhammed Kunju.K.M et al regarding civil disputes over property
The plaintiffs, Sreeletha.S and others, claim ownership of a property based on a settlement deed, while the defendants, including Muhammed Kunju.K.M and others, assert their own title through a sale deed. The case revolves around allegations of fraudulent execution of documents and possession of the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.988/1995
Case between Saraswathy Amma et al vs Babu et al regarding declaration of title, recovery of possession, and injunction.
The plaintiffs, headed by Saraswathy Amma, claim ownership of a property based on a partition deed and assert that the defendants, Babu and others, have encroached upon their land. The suit seeks recovery of possession and construction of a boundary wall after the defendants allegedly refuse cooperation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.606/2019
Case between M. Lalitha @ Lalitha Rajagopal vs Surya Kumari et al regarding partition and permanent injunction.
The case involves a suit filed by M. Lalitha against Surya Kumari and her children for partition of property and a permanent injunction. The plaintiff claims co-ownership of the property inherited from their father, while the defendants contest this claim based on a will that they allege bequeathed the property to them.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 14/2022
Case between Thankamma Amma et al vs The State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of civil death.
The plaintiffs are the close relatives of Mr. Suresh Babu, who has been missing since 15.08.1990. They seek a declaration of his civil death to facilitate legal proceedings regarding his estate.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 354/2019
Case between Rajendran et al vs M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited et al regarding dismissal for default
This case involves plaintiffs Rajendran, Prasanna, and Ammini against defendants M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited and Sanoj. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of plaintiffs and no evidence being presented.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 236/2018
Case between Sameer vs Laboodha Beevi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Sameer, the plaintiff, has filed a suit against Laboodha Beevi and others regarding a fixed deposit amount of 8,00,000/- in the Thiruvananthapuram District Co-operative Bank. The case concerns the refusal of the defendants to allot Sameer's rightful share of the deposit after the death of their father.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 198/2021
Case between Ayyappan vs Chandramathy regarding dismissal of suit
Ayyappan, the plaintiff, initiated a suit against Chandramathy, the defendant. The court dismissed the suit after the plaintiff's counsel filed a not pressed memo.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. 47/ 2025
Case between Arun. B.R. vs M/s Indigo Capital (Indigo) Pvt Ltd regarding injunction against business interference.
Arun. B.R. is the plaintiff seeking an injunction against M/s Indigo Capital (Indigo) Pvt Ltd. The court is addressing a request for temporary relief to prevent interference in the plaintiff's business.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 47/2025
Case between Arun. B.R. vs M/s Indigo Capital (India) Pvt Ltd regarding injunction.
Arun. B.R. is the petitioner seeking an ad-interim injunction against M/s Indigo Capital (India) Pvt Ltd and its director Mahesh Michael. The court found a prima facie case and granted temporary relief to prevent interference with the petitioner's business.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 54/2024
Case between Sony.V.G vs Azhakamma. P et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Sony.V.G, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Azhakamma. P and Saboora Beevi, who have allegedly trespassed and illegally constructed on her property. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property based on a settlement deed and power of attorney.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 246/2008
Case between Muhammed Ilyas vs Safarulla et al regarding dismissal for default
The plaintiffs are Muhammed Ilyas and Thajudeen, while the defendants include Safarulla, Jameela, and Mariyam Beevi. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and no steps were taken to adduce evidence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O. S. No. 315/2025
Case between Sharafudheen vs Nujumudheen regarding temporary injunction
The petitioner Sharafudheen is seeking a temporary injunction against his brother Nujumudheen to prevent him from encroaching on his property. The dispute arises over a pathway and allegations of unauthorized cutting of a new pathway.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 273/2015
Case between Rafeeka et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding default dismissal of the suit
Rafeeka and others are the plaintiffs, while the State of Kerala and its officials are the defendants. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and no steps were taken to proceed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 461/2023
Case between Suresh Kumar vs Chicago Constructions International Private Limited et al regarding temporary injunction for unauthorized construction
Suresh Kumar filed a petition against Chicago Constructions International Private Limited and its Managing Director S. Mohanakumar, seeking a temporary injunction to prevent further construction on a property and to remove an unauthorized construction. The case revolves around issues of property possession and encroachment.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 158/ 2024
Case between Unnikrishnan Potty vs Vijayakrishnan Nampoothiri regarding dismissal for default
Unnikrishnan Potty is the plaintiff and Vijayakrishnan Nampoothiri is the defendant. The plaintiff did not appear in court despite multiple opportunities, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 132/2012
Case between Hamza Haji vs Chakkalakkal Harif et al regarding property delivery
Hamza Haji as the decree holder claimed property delivery against Chakkalakkal Harif and Illikkal Khadeeja, resulting in property delivered and EP closed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 393/2012
Case between Unniveettil Vinesh vs Velalkandiparambil Gopinathan regarding property delivery
Unniveettil Vinesh filed a case against Velalkandiparambil Gopinathan for property delivery, and the court ordered the property to be delivered.
Civil Suit
EP 348/2011
Case between Kunnathodi Sarada et al vs Puliyakkathodi Kolavan et al regarding delivery of property
Decree holder Kunnathodi Sarada filed a case against several defendants for the delivery of property, which was ultimately granted by the court on 30-07-2013.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 56/2014
Case between Devaki vs Subrahmanyan regarding property delivery
Devaki, the decree holder, filed a petition against Subrahmanyan, the judgment debtor, for the delivery of property. The court ordered for the property to be delivered and recorded the same.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 127/2014
Case between Muhammedkutty et al vs Komukkutty regarding property delivery
Decree holders sought property delivery, which was granted and recorded by the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 301/2013
Case between Mandalaparambil Jayakumar vs Naduthodi Lakshmi regarding decree set aside
The court case was filed by Mandalaparambil Jayakumar against Naduthodi Lakshmi to set aside a decree dated 23-10-13.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 488/2012
Case between Chanakka Parambil Fathima Beevi vs Kollarikkal Abdul Rasheed regarding property delivery
Chanakka Parambil Fathima Beevi filed a case against Kollarikkal Abdul Rasheed for property delivery, and the court ordered the property to be delivered.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won