Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1256/2020

Case between Santhamma.S vs K. Sasidharan Nair regarding partition of property

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
Case Code No.
1256
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Santhamma.S, the plaintiff, is the widow of Late Sri. Kesava Pillai @ Kesavan Nair and is seeking a partition of property she shares with her son, K. Sasidharan Nair, the defendant. The plaintiff claims rights to a larger share of the property but the court found her claims insufficient due to lack of critical documentation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit filed by Santhamma.S as it found her claims regarding partition insufficient due to absence of essential documents. No relief was granted to her.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit filed by Santhamma.S as it found her claims regarding partition insufficient due to absence of essential documents. No relief was granted to her.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to produce critical documents necessary to establish her claims.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to produce critical documents necessary to establish her claims.
Supporting Evidence
The above point is answered accordingly. In light of the discussions on the foregoing point, this court is of the view that the plaintiff is not entitled to get any relief in her favour.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Santhamma.S
Party Age
79
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. Sasidharan Nair
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Gift Deed No. 2954/1958, Tax receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.S. Vineeth Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Unnikrishnan.P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought a preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
In light of the discussions on the foregoing point, this court is of the view that the plaintiff is not entitled to get any relief in her favour.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Gift Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is a certified copy of the Gift Deed which establishes the ownership of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is a tax receipt indicating the plaintiff's financial dealings related to the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Partition of property
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M. Lalitha @ Lalitha Rajagopal vs Surya Kumari et al regarding partition and permanent injunction.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rajesh Balakrishnan vs Sunitha Sundar et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Syed Mohammed Sadik vs Suresh Babu. R.C regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thulaseedharan.B. vs Bindu et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Court of Additional Munsiff (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Aravindan Nair et al vs Ramachandran Nair et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won