Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.427/2021

Case between Rajesh Balakrishnan vs Sunitha Sundar et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-02-06
Duration
approximately-3 years 11 months
Case Code No.
427
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rajesh Balakrishnan, the plaintiff, seeks partition of property and injunction against his sister, her husband, and his mother. The dispute revolves around property inherited from their father.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court partly allowed the plaintiff's suit, granting a preliminary decree for partition of the property among the parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court partly allowed the plaintiff's suit, granting a preliminary decree for partition of the property among the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved entitlement to partition based on the property’s inherited nature and contributions.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved entitlement to partition based on the property’s inherited nature and contributions.
Supporting Evidence
The case of the plaintiff for partition of the plaint schedule property stands proved by the evidence of PW1, pleadings and the documents marked from his side.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is partly decreed as follows: (b) A preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property by metes and bounds is granted.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajesh Balakrishnan
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunitha Sundar
Party Age
47
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sundar
Party Age
52
Relation
H/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijaya
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Sale deed No. 2644/1988, Copy of the Ration card No.1101059356, Original Aadhaar card No. 9189 9275 8379, Marriage certificate, Caste Certificate
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Punchakkari. G. Raveendran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. R. Gokul Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. C.R. Suresh Kumar (Pazhayidom)
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought a perpetual injunction against the defendants for their alleged illegal acts.
Evidence:
The prayer for perpetual injunction stands dismissed.
Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The plaintiff requested partition of the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
A preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property by metes and bounds is granted.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the Sale deed No. 2644/1988, produced by PW1 to prove ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Ration Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the Ration card marked to establish identity and residency.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Aadhaar Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Aadhaar card marked to verify identity.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Marriage Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marriage certificate marked as additional proof of identity.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Caste Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Caste Certificate marked to provide evidence related to personal status.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Partition of property
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 03/18/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M. Lalitha @ Lalitha Rajagopal vs Surya Kumari et al regarding partition and permanent injunction.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Santhamma.S vs K. Sasidharan Nair regarding partition of property
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Syed Mohammed Sadik vs Suresh Babu. R.C regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thulaseedharan.B. vs Bindu et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Court of Additional Munsiff (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Aravindan Nair et al vs Ramachandran Nair et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won