Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1563/2024

Case between T.S. Jayaprakash vs M/s Adrak Builders& Developers Pvt. LTD. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
Court of Additional Munsiff-III
Judge
Smt Sreelakshmi C.
Order Date
2025-09-26
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

T.S. Jayaprakash, the plaintiff, claims that M/s Adrak Builders& Developers Pvt. LTD. has unlawfully grabbed his property. The case involves determining the rights over certain properties and includes applications for the appointment of a commissioner and surveyor.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court allowed both applications for appointing a commissioner and surveyor to ascertain the boundaries of the disputed properties. This will help in just and proper adjudication of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed both applications for appointing a commissioner and surveyor to ascertain the boundaries of the disputed properties. This will help in just and proper adjudication of the suit.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, I.A.6/2024 and I.A.7/2024 stands allowed. Advocate Anupama is appointed as advocate commissioner and Taluk Surveyor to assist the advocate commissioner.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Adrak Builders& Developers Pvt. LTD.
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sri. Revikumar.B
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.S. Jayaprakash
Party Age
75
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Amar Dileep
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. S. S. Dileep Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendant from trespassing into plaint schedule properties.
Evidence:
The relief sought for by the plaintiff is for permanent prohibitory injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Application
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Filed by the defendant to appoint an advocate commissioner and surveyor to ascertain and report regarding the nature and extent of counter claim schedule property and plaint schedule property.
Reference:
IA 05/2025
Document Type: Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Filed by the plaintiff to identify and measure out plaint A, B and C schedule properties with respect to title deeds and revenue records.
Reference:
IA 07/2025
Document Type: Commission Order
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission applications were allowed for the just and proper adjudication of the suit.
Reference:
IA 06/2024 and IA 07/2024

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between T.S. Jayaprakash vs M/s Adrak Builders& Developers Pvt. LTD. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between T.S. Jayaprakash vs M/s Adrak Builders& Developers Pvt. LTD. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Shaji P.R vs Rajani regarding removal of encroachment and restoration of pathway
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Divya Kumar.P vs Peethambaran et al regarding recovery of possession and mesne profits.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aloysius E.Gomez et al vs Maglin Lobo regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Syed Mohammed Sadik vs Suresh Babu. R.C regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thulaseedharan.B. vs Bindu et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Court of Additional Munsiff (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won