Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 241/2016

Case between Sajeev vs Vasantha Kumari et al regarding partition of property

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P, MUNSIFF
Order Date
2025-12-01
Duration
approximately-9 years 7 months
Case Closed
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Sajeev, and the defendants, Vasantha Kumari and Usha, are siblings seeking a partition of their mother's property. The mother passed away in 2011, and the plaintiff claims a share in the jointly owned property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit and ordered that the plaint schedule property be divided into four equal shares. The plaintiff and the third defendant are to be allotted one share each.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Division of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit and ordered that the plaint schedule property be divided into four equal shares. The plaintiff and the third defendant are to be allotted one share each.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaint schedule property is partible as per the findings of the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaint schedule property is found to be partible and the plaintiff has equal rights over it.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed and a preliminary decree is passed as follows: - 1.The plaint schedule property shall be divided into four equal shares by metes and bounds and plaintiff and third defendant shall be allotted with one such share each over plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajeev
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vasantha Kumari
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Usha
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lathika
Party Age
51
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of settlement deed No. 3036/1978, Death certificate of Smt. G. Radhamony, Tax receipt dated 11/11/2015
Defendants Documents
Building Tax receipt dated 20/03/2023, Election ID card of Smt. Lathika, Ration card of Smt. Lathika, Copy of ration card of Lathika, Copy of Adhar card of Lathika

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Joy Bhaskar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Partition of the plaint schedule property by metes and bounds and allotment of one share to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The plaint schedule property shall be divided into four equal shares by metes and bounds and plaintiff and third defendant shall be allotted with one such share each over plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Acknowledgment of third defendant's claim to her share.
Evidence:
Defendant no.3 has also prayed for allotting portion of the property in which the residential building is situated to her.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of settlement deed No. 3036/1978 evidencing ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Death certificate of the mother confirming her passing on 15.10.2011.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt indicating property tax history relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Tax receipt for the building constructed by the third defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Election ID Card
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
ID identification of Smt. Lathika relevant to her claims.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Ration Card
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Ration card of Smt. Lathika evidencing her identity.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Copy of ration card
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Another copy of ration card of Lathika supporting her residence claim.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Copy of Aadhar Card
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Aadhar card of Lathika corroborating her identity and status.
Reference:
Ext.B5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Inheritance dispute
Case Code
Case between Sajeev vs Vasantha Kumari et al regarding partition of property
Case Code Year
Case between Sajeev vs Vasantha Kumari et al regarding partition of property

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Fri, 06/10/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vilambhagam Plavazhikam Residents Association vs Sasikumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Darsana vs Rajamma et al regarding partition of property
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sahir M.H. vs Kerala Small Industries Development Corporation Limited regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jacob vs Jetroode regarding declaration of title by adverse possession
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aravindan Nair et al vs Ramachandran Nair et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won