Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1677/2013

Case between Surendran Nair vs S. Jayakumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and setting aside a Will

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-10-27
Duration
approximately-12 years 18 days
Case Code No.
1677
Case Closed
Mon, 10/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Surendran Nair as the plaintiff, who claims ownership of property based on a Will executed by Smt. Rajamma. The defendants, including S. Jayakumar and others, are contesting the validity of the Will and asserting their own rights over the property, alleging fraud and undue influence.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of Surendran Nair, granting him a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, thereby restraining them from trespassing into the property and forcefully evicting him.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of Surendran Nair, granting him a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, thereby restraining them from trespassing into the property and forcefully evicting him.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient evidence supporting the plaintiff's claim of ownership through a valid Will and established that the defendants had no legal rights over the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the plaintiff was in lawful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property as per the Will executed by Smt. Rajamma.

Judgment Evidence:

O.S. No.1677/2013 is decreed as follows: a.Let the defendants and their henchmen be perpetually restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from forcefully evicting the plaintiff from the plaint schedule property otherwise than due process of law.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Surendran Nair
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S. Jayakumar
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Premachandran Nair
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Baby Sarojam
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
J. Gopinathan Nair
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shobhanakumari
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Will deed No.246/2013, Sale deed No.187/1991, Death Certificate of Sri. K. Velappan Nair, Death Certificate of Smt. Rajamma, Encumbrance certificate
Defendants Documents
Document dated 25.09.2013, Copy of complaint filed with the Chief Minister of Kerala, Copy of complaint filed with the Home Minister of Kerala

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. B. Vasudevan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Pradeep Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P.K. Venugopal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are perpetually restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from forcefully evicting the plaintiff.
Evidence:
O.S. No.1677/2013 can be decreed and O.S. No. 1906/2016 is only liable to be dismissed.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The defendants are perpetually restrained from doing any act detrimental to the peaceful possession of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Let the defendants and their henchmen be perpetually restrained from doing any act in the plaint schedule property detrimental to the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the same.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Will Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the plaintiff's claim to be the absolute owner of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the original ownership of the plaint schedule property by Sri. Velappan Nair.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document verifies the date of death of Sri. Velappan Nair.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document verifies the date of death of Smt. Rajamma.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Encumbrance certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document records the encumbrances on the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of plaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document relates to the proceedings in ARC No. 1106/2019.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Document
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document is presented by the defendant to support their claims.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document contains a complaint filed with the Chief Minister of Kerala.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document contains a complaint filed with the Home Minister of Kerala.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document contains findings relevant to the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Ownership Dispute
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2013

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sun, 10/27/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 10/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Gladstone.D et al vs Lilibai et al regarding partition and injunction.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rajesh Balakrishnan vs Sunitha Sundar et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Syed Mohammed Sadik vs Suresh Babu. R.C regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thulaseedharan.B. vs Bindu et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Court of Additional Munsiff (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Aravindan Nair et al vs Ramachandran Nair et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won