Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.160/2023

Case between M/s. Attukal Shopping Complex Pvt. Ltd vs City Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-10-29
Duration
approximately-2 years 26 days
Case Code No.
160
Case Closed
Wed, 10/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Attukal Shopping Complex Pvt. Ltd filed a suit against the City Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram seeking a permanent injunction. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant is wrongfully renewing D&O licenses for former licensees without the required consent after termination of their licenses.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff, stating that the plaintiff is not entitled to the reliefs as prayed for. The claim of the plaintiff was deemed insufficient based on the presented evidences.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff, stating that the plaintiff is not entitled to the reliefs as prayed for. The claim of the plaintiff was deemed insufficient based on the presented evidences.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff did not prove the necessary facts to support the claim for relief as the suit was dismissed for lack of evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff did not prove the necessary facts to support the claim for relief as the suit was dismissed for lack of evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Upon a meaningful reading of the pleadings and a review of the evidence on record, it can be seen that the plaintiff by indulging in suppressio veri and suggestio falsi and through clever drafting, have tried to mislead this Court by creating the illusion of a cause of action against the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: The suit is dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Attukal Shopping Complex Pvt. Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
City Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram
Plaintiffs Documents
Original land tax receipt dated 30.03.2022, Original land tax receipt dated 15.02.2021, Original License Deed dated 04.02.2023, Original License Deed dated 22.09.2022, Original License Deed dated 01.11.2022, Original License Deed dated 16.03.2022, Original License Deed dated 17.10.2022, Original License Deed dated 10.10.2022
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.R. Anandakuttan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Rajeev
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from issuing D&O licenses to former licensees.
Evidence:
In light of the discussions in the foregoing point, this court is of the view that the plaintiff is not entitled to get the reliefs as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original land tax receipt used to prove ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original land tax receipt used to support the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type: License Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original License Deed outlining terms and conditions for one of the licensees.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: License Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original License Deed outlining terms and conditions for another licensee.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: License Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original License Deed outlining terms and conditions for yet another licensee.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: License Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original License Deed for another individual licensee.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: License Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original License Deed for another licensee.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: License Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original License Deed for another individual licensee.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sun, 10/29/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 10/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Gladstone.D et al vs Lilibai et al regarding partition and injunction.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rajesh Balakrishnan vs Sunitha Sundar et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Syed Mohammed Sadik vs Suresh Babu. R.C regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thulaseedharan.B. vs Bindu et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Court of Additional Munsiff (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Aravindan Nair et al vs Ramachandran Nair et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won