Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 673/2021

Case between M.Subhash Babu et al vs Suresh Babu et al regarding boundary, prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt. Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-10-30
Duration
approximately-4 years 20 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, M.Subhash Babu and E.K.Madhavan Nair Family Trust, filed a suit against the defendants, Suresh Babu and Bindhu.V., to prevent alleged trespassing on property held by the trust. The plaintiffs claim they are protecting their rights against attempts to encroach and claim compensation unfairly from land acquisition authorities.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the plaintiffs' injunction application, prohibiting the defendants from committing any waste or encroaching on the scheduled properties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restrained the defendants from committing waste in the petition schedule properties.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the plaintiffs' injunction application, prohibiting the defendants from committing any waste or encroaching on the scheduled properties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs established a prima facie case and the balance of convenience favored them due to the risk of irreparable loss.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The apprehension of plaintiff stands prima facie established. So also the balance of convenience lies in favour of plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result I.A.04/2025 stands dismissed and I.A.02/2021 stands allowed and as follows: 1) I.A.4/2025 is dismissed 2) I.A.2/2021 allowed restraining the defendants from committing any waste in the petition schedule properties...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.Subhash Babu
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o.late E.K.Madhavan Nair
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
E.K.Madhavan Nair Family Trust No.IV/31/2005
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh Babu
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o. late E.K.Madhavan Nair
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bindhu.V.
Party Age
56
Relation
D/o.late Vijayamma
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Partition Deed No.2107/96, Copy of Gift Deed No. 2273/2005, Original of the Family Trust IV/31/2005, Tax Receipt
Defendants Documents
Notice, Mahazar

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V.S.Bhasurendran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. N. Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Aji Gopinath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraining the defendants from committing waste in the petition schedule properties.
Evidence:
I.A.2/2021 allowed restraining the defendants from committing any waste in the petition schedule properties by cutting and removing the trees standing thereon or removing the soil or from taking away the articles kept in the buildings and sheds in the schedule properties or claiming any compensation amount in excess of their extent of property from the Land Acquisition Authorities.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Challenging the maintainability of the injunction application and the suit.
Evidence:
I.A.4/2025 is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Partition Deed No.2107/96 relevant to property allocation.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Gift Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Gift Deed No. 2273/2005 showing transfer of properties to the trust.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Family Trust Document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of the Family Trust IV/31/2005 establishing the trust.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt dated 10/12/2018 relevant to the properties in question.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Notice dated 25/08/2020 issued in context of the dispute.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Mahazar
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Mahazar relating to the properties of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Boundary Dispute
Case Code
Case between M.Subhash Babu et al vs Suresh Babu et al regarding boundary, prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.
Case Code Year
Case between M.Subhash Babu et al vs Suresh Babu et al regarding boundary, prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 04/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Gladstone.D et al vs Lilibai et al regarding partition and injunction.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rajesh Balakrishnan vs Sunitha Sundar et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Syed Mohammed Sadik vs Suresh Babu. R.C regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thulaseedharan.B. vs Bindu et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Court of Additional Munsiff (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Aravindan Nair et al vs Ramachandran Nair et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won