Similar Cases
Based on: OS. No.1927/2019 — Case between C.Ravi vs Anila Prasad et al regarding mediation settlement
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS.No.119/2024
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Chandran.K regarding mediation settlement
Canara Bank filed a suit against Chandran.K regarding a dispute that has been settled through mediation. The court has decreed the suit in accordance with the mediation agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 519/2024
Case between Canara Bank et al vs M/s. Parppys Graphx regarding settlement of suit.
Canara Bank is the plaintiff represented by its manager, and the defendant is M/s. Parppys Graphx represented by its proprietor. The case is related to a settlement agreement reached through mediation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 1087/2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Sikha Anil et al regarding mediation settlement
The case involves Canara Bank as the plaintiff and Sikha Anil and Anilkumar B. as defendants. The matter has been settled in mediation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No 1536/2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Danam I Christina regarding settlement of a financial dispute.
Canara Bank, represented by its manager Rakesh Krishnan, filed a suit against Danam I Christina. The matter has been settled through mediation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1304/2024
Case between Sree pattom smaraka grandhasala and recreation centre vs Satheesh Kumar regarding mediation agreement
The case involves a plaintiff, Sree pattom smaraka grandhasala and recreation centre, represented by its President S. Krishnan Nair, against the defendant, Satheesh Kumar. The matter was settled through mediation, resulting in a decree based on the mediation agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 135/2019
Case between Sasidharan vs Jayaprakash et al regarding mediation agreement
Sasidharan filed a suit against Jayaprakash and others. The parties settled their disputes through mediation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.194/2025
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
The plaintiffs, Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran and Divakaran Padma Kumar Pillay, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, Deepti Sivan, to restrain her from transferring certain stocks and shares. The court found that the plaintiffs made out a prima facie case warranting the injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.48/2022
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
Sreenath.S is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Thankarajan and Usha. The suit was dismissed as not pressed after the plaintiff's counsel filed a not press memo.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.188/2020
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.
M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. filed a suit against Santha and others for the recovery of a loan amount of Rs.61,914. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite receiving notice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.204/2023
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
The plaintiffs Sindhu.S, Janaki.B.S, and Mohandas.D are involved in a suit against defendants Lalitha and Ashok Kumar.I. The case was dismissed as withdrawn after being heard.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.315/2023
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak filed a suit against Babu Chettiyar and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent them from demolishing her compound wall and causing waste on her property. The plaintiff alleges harassment and obstruction from the defendants, which poses a risk to her safety and property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.338/2018
Case between Biji.R vs Sheeja regarding specific performance
Biji.R filed a suit against Sheeja for specific performance of a contract regarding the sale of a property. The plaintiff claims that the defendant failed to execute the sale deed despite receiving an advance sale consideration.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.375/2023
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves the Union Bank of India as the plaintiff and Midhun. M as the defendant. The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and lack of application.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.394/2019
Case between All India Sports Council for Deaf vs The Deaf Cricket Society et al regarding return of suit
The case involves the All India Sports Council for Deaf as the plaintiff against The Deaf Cricket Society and others as defendants. The court addressed procedural issues regarding the proper jurisdiction for the lawsuit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.406/2024
Case between Canara Bank vs Jyothish Kumar N regarding realisation of money
Canara Bank is seeking to recover outstanding loans from Jyothish Kumar N. The defendant failed to appear in court to contest the claims made by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.423/2024
Case between Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor et al vs Indian Pentecostal Church of God et al regarding civil proceedings
The plaintiffs, including the Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor and its representatives, are involved in a civil case against the Indian Pentecostal Church of God and its councils. The suit addresses matters related to church governance and representation.
Civil Suit
OS.No.470/2021
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd vs Basheer K.H et al regarding recovery of money.
The plaintiff, M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd, filed a suit against the defendants Basheer K.H, Smt. Sameera Basheer, and Babeer T.P for recovery of a loan amount. The case was heard ex-parte as the defendants did not appear before the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.471/2024
Case between Canara Bank vs Sreereshmi C R, Remadevi P regarding realisation of money
Canara Bank filed a suit against Sreereshmi C R and Remadevi P for the recovery of an educational loan amounting to Rs.1,77,203. The defendants were absent and the case proceeded ex-parte.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.504/2015
Case between Ramesan vs Sujatha et al regarding partition of ancestral property.
The plaintiff Ramesan seeks a partition of the ancestral property claimed jointly with the defendants, who are siblings. The case arises from disputes over the joint possession and ownership of property following the death of their mother.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.598/2024
Case between Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor et al vs Indian Pentecostal Church of God et al regarding Power of Attorney
The case involves the Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor and various defendants from the Indian Pentecostal Church of God regarding the acceptance of a power of attorney. The plaintiffs challenge the validity of the power of attorney executed by the third defendant.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.718/2020
Case between Beatrice Miranda vs Sheela Tommy et al regarding violation of injunction order
Beatrice Miranda filed a petition alleging that the respondents violated an injunction order preventing them from trespassing on her property. The court addressed the claims related to the pathway and constructed gate leading to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.745/2023
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, seeks to recover an outstanding loan amount from the defendant group Ayodhya Kudumbasree, which has defaulted on repayments. The case involves multiple members of the self-help group represented by their officials.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.777/2016
Case between I. Thankanilavu vs S. Kumar regarding Suit for realistion of money.
The plaintiff, I. Thankanilavu, is seeking recovery of ₹5,00,000/- from the defendant, S. Kumar, who did not hand over the shop room as agreed upon. The plaintiff claims the defendant breached their agreement and has not returned the money.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.834/2023
Case between Jyothishmathi vs Krishna Kumar regarding realization of money.
The plaintiff, Jyothishmathi, has filed a suit against the defendant, Krishna Kumar, for the realization of a loan amount of Rs.5,00,000/- borrowed by the defendant. The defendant failed to repay the loan despite being notified and placed ex-parte in the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.860 /2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
The case involves Canara Bank, represented by its Senior Manager, against Smt. Sheeja. N regarding the rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fees. The court has rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1043/2017
Case between Antony vs Stansilas et al regarding partition and injunction
The case involves a dispute over a property originally owned by the father of the plaintiff Antony and the defendants. The plaintiff seeks partition and injunction against the defendants attempting to evict him from the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1065/2017
Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions
The plaintiffs, M.V. Shafi and M.V. Shanavas, contend they are entitled to a share of their father's property, claiming that the partitions made by their father, M M. Vahabudeen, are null and void. The defendants argue against this claim and state the suit is not maintainable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1190/2018
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, Indian Overseas Bank, has filed a suit against the defendant, Santhosh Kumar, for the recovery of a loan of ₹1,55,178/- due to non-repayment. The defendant had taken a loan from the plaintiff bank and failed to comply with the repayment terms.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1280/2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, sued the defendants, Jayan. E and Saleela, for the recovery of an outstanding loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan, leading to the suit for realization of the owed sum.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1295/2023
Case between Aravindan Nair et al vs Ramachandran Nair et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, who are siblings, sought a partition of property from the defendants, also siblings, after the death of their sister. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants were obstructing their rights to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1349/2023
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, filed a suit against Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit and its members for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite repeated requests and notices sent by the bank.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1430/2022
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves Indian Overseas Bank as the plaintiff and Aradhi Restaurant as the defendant, represented by its Proprietress. The court dealt with the rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and lack of applications.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1475/2022
Case between Bindu vs Jayakumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Bindu, is the owner of a building from which she has attempted to evict a tenant due to non-payment of rent. The defendant, Jayakumar, allegedly attempted to trespass into the property, prompting the lawsuit for an injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1613/2018
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
The case involves Kerala Gramin Bank seeking the repayment of a loan amount of ₹58,270/- from the defendants, Shibu.V and Krishnapanicker, who defaulted on their loan payments. The defendants were set ex parte due to their absence in court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1640/2023
Case between Selvaraj. A vs Mony @ Maniyan regarding realisation of money.
The case involves Selvaraj. A as the plaintiff and his father-in-law Mony @ Maniyan as the defendant, regarding the recovery of a loan amount of ₹2,00,000/- that was not repaid. The plaintiff claims the amount along with interest after repeated demands went unheeded.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1645/2022
Case between M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Remya.S et al regarding recovery of money.
M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendants due to their failure to repay. The case was heard ex-parte as the defendants did not appear in court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1940/2013
Case between Suhara Beevi et al vs Subaida et al regarding mandatory injunction and recovery of possession.
The case involves the plaintiffs seeking a mandatory injunction and recovery of possession against the defendants regarding certain shop rooms and a residential building. The additional second plaintiff, who is the son of the first plaintiff, claims the defendants have been occupying the premises without proper rights.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1963/2023
Case between Geo Expert Pvt Ltd. vs Justin.V.S regarding dismissal of suit
Geo Expert Pvt Ltd. initiated a suit against Justin.V.S. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff despite notice.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1664/2024
Case between Mithun John Mathew vs Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala regarding mediation agreement.
Mithun John Mathew is the plaintiff against Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala. The suit was finally heard on January 31, 2025, and the court delivered its judgment on the same day.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.184/2025
Case between Asok Kumar et al vs Vinaya Chandran et al regarding injunction
The petitioners, Asok Kumar and Shaji, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendants, Vinaya Chandran, Vinisha Chandran, and Sreejith, to prevent further construction on certain properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.180/2023
Case between Canara Bank vs D. Hari Krishnan et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
Canara Bank has filed a suit against D. Hari Krishnan and his mother, Mallika. B for non-repayment of an educational loan that has become a non-performing asset.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.366/2020
Case between Thribhuvana Vikraman @ Thribhu vs Sudha regarding suit dismissal for default
The plaintiff, Thribhuvana Vikraman @ Thribhu, was absent during the hearing, and there was no representation. As a result, the case was dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.472/2018
Case between P.C. Samuel vs S. Xavier regarding arrears of rent and damages
P.C. Samuel, the plaintiff, rented out a building to S. Xavier, the defendant, for running a hotel. The plaintiff claimed arrears of rent and damages due to the defendant's non-payment and alleged damage to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.704/2017
Case between W. Selvaraj vs Sam Raj et al regarding rejection of plaint
W. Selvaraj is the plaintiff who brought the case against Sam Raj and Kala Suresh regarding a civil matter. The court found the plaintiff absent with no representation and rejected the plaint due to non-payment of court fees.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.1133/2023
Case between K. Prathap kumar et al vs Sheela regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, K. Prathap kumar and Jesmi, are seeking protection against the defendant, Sheela, who is attempting to encroach upon a public path used by the plaintiffs. The defendant has been set ex parte as she did not respond to the summons.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1888/2022
Case between Harikumar.S.P vs Lalitha.O et al regarding plaint rejection
Harikumar.S.P is the plaintiff, while Lalitha.O and Manu.M.L are the defendants. The case involves the rejection of the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and non-remittance of court fees.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1978/2022
Case between Aji vs Rajasekharan Nair regarding injunction and other consequential reliefs.
Aji filed a suit against Rajasekharan Nair seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction regarding a property sale agreement. The defendant failed to execute the sale deed as agreed, leading to the plaintiff's legal action.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1984/2022
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
The case involves The Federal Bank Limited, which granted a personal loan to Benoy Francis. The defendant defaulted on the loan repayments despite repeated notices.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won