Similar Cases
Based on: OS 149/2019 — Case between Parol Imbichikoya vs Pulparambil Asees regarding restoration of a case
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS 146/2017
Case between Moideen.V.P vs Pathumma et al regarding setting aside a final decree
The petitioner Moideen.V.P seeks to set aside a final decree in a partition suit due to alleged non-receipt of summons. The respondents argue that the petitioner was aware of the proceedings and failed to appear knowingly.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 44/2018
Case between C.M.Sreemathy et al vs Raman @Ramachandran et al regarding restoration of suit.
The petitioners, led by C.M.Sreemathy, seek to restore a suit that was adjourned due to the absence of the 6th plaintiff, who is undergoing treatment. The respondents objected to the petition, stating that no medical records were presented to substantiate the claim.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 463/2003
Case between PT Chandran vs P R Ashok regarding setting aside an exparte decree
PT Chandran filed a petition to set aside an exparte decree dating back to 14.02.2005. The petition was due to the petitioner’s claim of being unaware of the proceedings and health issues preventing his appearance in court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 63/2024
Case between Ratheesh T vs Vibul M regarding IA 166/2024
The case involves a petition by Ratheesh T, who is the defendant, against Vibul M, the plaintiff. The court dismissed the interim application due to non-payment of costs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 164/2021
Case between Madhavan MP et al vs Sreejith MP regarding IA allowed.
Madhavan MP, Reeja MP, Sheeja MP, and Prabija MP are the plaintiffs in this case against Sreejith MP. The petition concerns an application that has been allowed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 286/2017
Case between Mungipurayil Beevi vs Angadimuriyil Jameela et al regarding RP IA 105/2024
Mungipurayil Beevi is the plaintiff and Angadimuriyil Jameela along with others are the defendants. The case involves a petition for hearing related to an interim application.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 139/2024
Case between P P Ra et al vs Nishad Muhammad Ali regarding dismissal of suit
The plaintiffs, including P P Ra, Lalitha V M, and others, filed a suit against the defendant Nishad Muhammad Ali. The counsel for the plaintiffs stated that the suit is not pressed, leading to its dismissal.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 109/2013
Case between Laiju Thomas vs Panackal Usman et al regarding RP IA 569/2018
Laiju Thomas, the petitioner, filed a petition against Panackal Usman and others. The petition was not pressed and subsequently dismissed by the court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 123/2022
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves JANU, the plaintiff, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against BAHULEYAN @ BABU, the defendant, regarding trespassing and boundary destruction of the plaint schedule property. The petitioner claims identity issues regarding the property need resolution before the court can proceed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.388/2020
Case between Kalarikandy Subash Babu (died), Durga Devi, Bindya, Sandya vs Kasthuri Bai, Ramani Bai regarding partition of property.
This case involves a partition dispute over property following a preliminary decree. The plaintiffs are seeking to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to measure and divide the suit properties as decreed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 114/2024
Case between Canara Bank vs M/S U.B. Hardwares regarding suit dismissal
Canara Bank filed a suit represented by its Chief Manager against M/S U.B. Hardwares and its proprietor. The case was dismissed as not pressed by the court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 152/2020
Case between Sujith K.M. vs P. Chandramathi @ Chandrika et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Sujith K.M., is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, P. Chandramathi @ Chandrika and P. Baburajan, to prevent them from trespassing into his property. The defendants are alleged to have attempted to construct a way through the plaintiff's land.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.169/2021
Case between Panakkal Mammedkoya vs Fabir et al regarding partition
The plaintiff, Panakkal Mammedkoya, is seeking a partition of family property originally belonging to his mother. The defendants, Fabir and others, have not agreed to partition despite several demands.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.224/2024
Case between Saseendran vs Sreedharan et al regarding possession of property
Saseendran initiated this suit for possession of property against Sreedharan and others. The matter was settled in mediation, resulting in a decree based on the mediation agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.301/2021
Case between M/s. Konari Enterprises vs M/s.K.M.Traders regarding return of money
The plaintiff, M/s. Konari Enterprises, is seeking to recover an amount due from the defendant, M/s.K.M.Traders, following a credit facility availed by the defendant. The defendant has failed to repay the amount despite repeated reminders and a lawyer's notice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No : 449/2024
Case between Punnya Ranjith vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal
Punnya Ranjith, a minor represented by his mother, Sangeetha K., filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was dismissed by the court as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 349/2021
Case between Dayaana K. vs Marunadan Malayalee et al regarding damages and mandatory injunction.
Dayaana K. filed a suit against Marunadan Malayalee and others for damages and mandatory injunction due to the publication of a defamatory news item. The case centers around the false allegations made against Dayaana in an attempt to defame her reputation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 449/2024
Case between Punnya Ranjith vs State of Kerala, Deputy Director Education, General Convenor regarding suit dismissal
Punnya Ranjith, a minor represented by his mother Sangeetha K., filed the suit against the State of Kerala and other officials regarding a matter related to the educational event. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No : 450/2024
Case between Ishani S. Nair vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Ishani S. Nair, a minor represented by her mother Neethumol, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other educational authorities. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO :451/2024
Case between Sravan Krishna vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal.
This case involves a minor, Sravan Krishna, represented by his father, Shaji. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 38/2021
Case between Illath Abdul Majeed et al vs Minas Thenanchery regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, consisting of Illath Abdul Majeed and K. Balaramakurup, are the President and Secretary of Nanmanda High School Society, and they have filed a suit against Minas Thenanchery. The case involves a dispute regarding the authority of the defendant to issue notices as President of the society after resigning from the position.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No : 163/2020
Case between Chathunni vs Kozhikode District Library Council et al regarding realisation of money
Chathunni, a consulting engineer, filed a suit against the Kozhikode District Library Council and its officials for unpaid supervision and estimate charges related to renovation work at the Mananchira Central Library. He claims to have been entitled to a higher payment for his services but was only compensated partially.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 508/2022
Case between Dileep Kumar vs Sunil kumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Dileep Kumar filed a suit against Sunil Kumar for a permanent prohibitory injunction concerning a property dispute. The case involves issues of shared property rights and unlawful attempts to access a well.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 564/2023
Case between Arabhi et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissed for default.
The plaintiffs, who are minors represented by a next friend, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff did not adduce any evidence and the relief sought had become infructuous.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 588/2018
Case between V. Doraswami vs T. Rajeev et al regarding permanent perpetual prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, V. Doraswami, is involved in a case against the defendants, T. Rajeev and K.S. Ashraf Ali, concerning a dispute over access to a property owned by the plaintiff. The plaintiff is seeking an injunction to prevent the defendants from trespassing and obstructing access to the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.17/2022
Case between Mandattil Bhaskaran vs Mekoth Parambil Vineesh regarding declaration of a false and fabricated settlement deed.
The plaintiff, Mandattil Bhaskaran, alleges that he was misled by the defendant, Mekoth Parambil Vineesh, into signing a settlement deed under false pretenses. The plaintiff seeks to declare this deed invalid and prevent the defendant from taking possession of the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.225/2021
Case between Chandrasekharan vs Pankajam, Radhakrishnan regarding partition.
The plaintiffs are Chandrasekharan, and the defendants are Pankajam and Radhakrishnan. The case concerns a partition of property.
Civil Suit
Original Suit No. 194/2021
Case between Muhammed vs Abdul Rahiman et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Muhammed is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Abdul Rahiman and Ameer, regarding access to property. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property which the defendants allegedly entered and used without permission.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 359/2024
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Shilpa K. et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.
This case involves Bank of Baroda as the plaintiff and Shilpa K. and Rajan K. as defendants. The matter was settled and the suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 360/2024
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Shilpa K. et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed
The case involves Bank of Baroda as the plaintiff and Shilpa K., Rajan K., and Sreeja V.V. as defendants. The matter was settled and the plaintiff's counsel did not press the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 419 /2024
Case between Abdul Nazar vs Pradeepan regarding mediation agreement
Abdul Nazar, the plaintiff, and Pradeepan, the defendant, are involved in this case regarding the terms of a mediation agreement. The court has found the agreement lawful and executable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.31/2021
Case between Young Women Christian Association (YWCA) vs Dr.Arshad.P et al regarding eviction and damages for unauthorized use
The Young Women Christian Association (YWCA) filed a suit against Dr. Arshad.P and his legal heirs for eviction from a property after a license agreement was allegedly breached. The court considered the nature of the agreement and the subsequent non-payment of license fees.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.406/2020
Case between N.P.Haris et al vs Achuthanandan et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, N.P.Haris and Sulaika, sought a mandatory injunction against the defendants, which included Achuthanandan and others. The case concluded with the court dismissing the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 143/2022
Case between Sharmada P.V. vs Pramod Parappattoli et al regarding suit dismissal for default
Sharmada P.V. is the plaintiff, while Pramod Parappattoli and Jayamohan are the defendants. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.217/21
Case between P.G.Gangadharan et al vs K.Jayesh et al regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves P.G.Gangadharan and M.K.Manjula as plaintiffs against K.Jayesh and Reena.C as defendants regarding a dispute over property and access to a pathway. The plaintiffs seek a mandatory injunction to restore their property and to prevent trespassing.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 107/2024
Case between State Bank of India, Thamarassery Branch vs Musammil M.M., Muhammed M.M. regarding a compromise settlement.
The case involves the State Bank of India as the plaintiff and two defendants, Musammil M.M. and Muhammed M.M. The matter concerns a suit that was settled through a joint compromise.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 576/2018
Case between Haris C.P. vs Shakkeela et al regarding partition of property
Haris C.P. filed an application for final decree regarding partition of property among legal heirs. The court reviewed the application and decided upon the allotment of shares as per the commissioner’s report.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.02/2022
Case between Sudheer Kumar vs Sunilkumar et al regarding patition.
Sudheer Kumar is the plaintiff, and Sunilkumar and Suresh Kumar.V are the defendants. The plaintiff presented a suit for partition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.43/2022
Case between K.V.Kabeer vs Mariyambi regarding partition
K.V.Kabeer is the plaintiff seeking partition of property. The defendant, Mariyambi and Kattungal Krishnan, were present for the hearing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 371/2022
Case between Anil Kumar vs Sarojini et al regarding settlement of suit
The case involves Anil Kumar as the plaintiff and multiple defendants including Sarojini and others. The matter has been settled through mediation with an agreement entered by all parties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 378/2021
Case between Dr. Saliq Mohammed N. et al vs Muslim Edcational Society (Regd) et al regarding dismissal for default.
The plaintiffs, Dr. Saliq Mohammed N. and Sainudheen P., were involved in this suit against the Muslim Educational Society and other defendants. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.418/2014
Case between Elambilassery Shamsudheen vs Khadeeja regarding easement by necessity
Elambilassery Shamsudheen and Elambilassery Naseema are plaintiffs seeking an injunction against Khadeeja and others, claiming a right of easement over a disputed pathway. The defendants deny the existence of this easement and contest the plaintiffs' claims.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.09/2021
Case between Amjad.C.S et al vs Aparna.P.M regarding suit for decree and judgment
The case involves plaintiffs Amjad.C.S and Amith.C.S suing the defendant Aparna.P.M. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.429/2020
Case between K.Jayesh et al vs P.G.Gangadharan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, K.Jayesh and Reena.C, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.68/2021
Case between Col.Raveendra Babu vs Anekh.K.V regarding perpectual prohibitory injunction
Col.Raveendra Babu is the plaintiff seeking a perpetual prohibitory injunction against Anekh.K.V, the defendant. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not present.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.112/2013
Case between Keloth Premanand et al vs Azhiyur Dinesh Babu regarding Eeasement of Neceessity and permenant prohibitory injunction
The case involves plaintiffs Keloth Premanand and Azhiyur Neena Premanand against defendant Azhiyur Dinesh Babu regarding a suit for easement of necessity and permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiffs were absent during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.256/2020
Case between Shyma vs Kripaladas et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Shyma, the plaintiff, has filed a suit against Kripaladas and Vilasini for a perpetual prohibitory injunction. The court ultimately dismissed the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.328/2021
Case between K.Soman et al vs Murali regarding preliminary decree proceedings.
The plaintiffs, K.Soman, K.Manoharan, K.Santhosh Kumar, M.Prameela kumari, and Bindumathi, are seeking a preliminary decree. The defendant, Murali, was set ex parte during the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won