Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 286/2017

Case between Mungipurayil Beevi vs Angadimuriyil Jameela et al regarding RP IA 105/2024

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.Meera John K
Order Date
2025-11-03
Duration
Case Code No.
286
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mungipurayil Beevi is the plaintiff and Angadimuriyil Jameela along with others are the defendants. The case involves a petition for hearing related to an interim application.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has allowed the interim application, indicating a favorable decision for the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has allowed the interim application, indicating a favorable decision for the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The application was allowed due to the costs being paid.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The application was allowed due to the costs being paid.
Supporting Evidence
Costs paid. Hence I.A. is allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

Costs paid. Hence I.A. is allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mungipurayil Beevi
Party Age
61
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Angadimuriyil Jameela
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Angadimuriyil Shanid
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Angadimuriyil Shamnas (Died)
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ayisha
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Navas
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.N.Manoj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.Sivadasan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sajna Muhammed Ali
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Deepika Nambiar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Sivadasan.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
I.A. is allowed.
Evidence:
Costs paid. Hence I.A. is allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Ratheesh T vs Vibul M regarding IA 166/2024
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between PT Chandran vs P R Ashok regarding setting aside an exparte decree
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between C.M.Sreemathy et al vs Raman @Ramachandran et al regarding restoration of suit.
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Parol Imbichikoya vs Pulparambil Asees regarding restoration of a case
Principal Munsiff Court -I
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Moideen.V.P vs Pathumma et al regarding setting aside a final decree
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Civil Suit Defendant Won