Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 44/2018

Case between C.M.Sreemathy et al vs Raman @Ramachandran et al regarding restoration of suit.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.Meera John K
Order Date
2025-09-27
Duration
approximately-7 years 20 days
Case Code No.
44
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, led by C.M.Sreemathy, seek to restore a suit that was adjourned due to the absence of the 6th plaintiff, who is undergoing treatment. The respondents objected to the petition, stating that no medical records were presented to substantiate the claim.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for restoration of the suit due to sufficient reasons provided for the non-appearance of the 6th plaintiff. However, the petitioners are required to pay costs to the respondents.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of the suit contingent upon the payment of costs of 4,000/-
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for restoration of the suit due to sufficient reasons provided for the non-appearance of the 6th plaintiff. However, the petitioners are required to pay costs to the respondents.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner provided sufficient reason for the non-appearance at trial.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner provided sufficient reason for the non-appearance at trial.
Supporting Evidence
Sufficient reason is shown by the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, I find that this petition can be allowed and at the same time the opposite side is to be adequately compensated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Geetha.V.T
Party Age
78
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Beena Naveen Kumar
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C.M.Jeevan
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C.M.Sharmila
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C.M.Rajeev
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raman @Ramachandran
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
N.M.Ashokan
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
E.Sunil Kumar
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.B.Sivarama Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.P.Gangadharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
This petition is filed to restore the suit to file.
Evidence:
Hence, I find that this petition can be allowed and at the same time the opposite side is to be adequately compensated.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Compensation of costs to the opposite side.
Evidence:
Hence, I find that this petition can be allowed and at the same time the opposite side is to be adequately compensated.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2018

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Madhavan MP et al vs Sreejith MP regarding IA allowed.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ratheesh T vs Vibul M regarding IA 166/2024
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between PT Chandran vs P R Ashok regarding setting aside an exparte decree
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Parol Imbichikoya vs Pulparambil Asees regarding restoration of a case
Principal Munsiff Court -I
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Moideen.V.P vs Pathumma et al regarding setting aside a final decree
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Civil Suit Defendant Won