Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No.31/2021

Case between Young Women Christian Association (YWCA) vs Dr.Arshad.P et al regarding eviction and damages for unauthorized use

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Sri. Vivek P.
Order Date
2025-01-21
Duration
approximately-6 years 6 months
Case Closed
Tue, 01/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Young Women Christian Association (YWCA) filed a suit against Dr. Arshad.P and his legal heirs for eviction from a property after a license agreement was allegedly breached. The court considered the nature of the agreement and the subsequent non-payment of license fees.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to vacate the premises and to pay outstanding license fees and damages for unauthorized use of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants directed to vacate the property, pay arrears of license fee and damages for unauthorized use.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to vacate the premises and to pay outstanding license fees and damages for unauthorized use of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient evidence that the original defendant had breached the license agreement and continued occupying the property illegally.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found sufficient evidence that the original defendant had breached the license agreement and continued occupying the property illegally.
Supporting Evidence
The quintessential question for determination is the nature of the relationship between the plaintiff and defendant... In the absence of evidence to prove or to suggest any foul play in the execution of Ext. A2, the only possible conclusion that can be drawn is that the original defendant... entered into a transaction by executing Ext. A2.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1) That the defendants are hereby directed by way of a mandatory injunction to remove themselves from the plaint schedule property within a period of one month from today failing which the plaintiff can execute the order by the process of the court.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Young Women Christian Association (YWCA)
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr.Arshad.P(died)
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sabeena.N.K
Relation
W/o. (Late)Dr.Arshad.P
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Irin Ayisa.P
Relation
D/o. (Late)Dr.Arshad.P
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Naved Mahasin
Relation
S/o. (Late)Dr.Arshad.P
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Iyin Shahariyan
Relation
S/o. (Late)Dr.Arshad.P
Plaintiffs Documents
License agreement entered into on 15.01.2019, Lawyer notice dated 07.09.2020.
Defendants Documents
Cash bills issued by Indo electricals, Computer print of cash bill issued from Spario Bath Solution.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Simon Chacko
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Muhammed Haneef
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Forcing the defendants to vacate the property.
Evidence:
Hence I find that the plaintiff is entitled for the relief as prayed for.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ordering the defendants to pay the arrears of license fee.
Evidence:
Hence I find that the plaintiff is entitled for the arrears of license fee as prayed for.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
For illegal use and occupation of the property.
Evidence:
Hence I find that the plaintiff is entitled for damages for use and occupation for the period occupied.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Minutes of Board of Management
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document demonstrating the authorization of the plaintiff to file the suit.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Licence agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Primary document outlining the terms of the license agreement between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document notifying the defendant about the termination of the license agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supportive evidence of the plaintiff's claims regarding property tax.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Cash Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing payments made related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidences payments made for building maintenance.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Personal Diary
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document from the defendant supporting their claims.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Cash bills
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Supporting documents for expenditures made by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Computer print of Gypsum Work details
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Evidences renovations made by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Demand cum disconnection notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Evidence of disputes related to utility payments.
Reference:
Ext.B5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Young Women Christian Association (YWCA) vs Dr.Arshad.P et al regarding eviction and damages for unauthorized use
Case Code Year
Case between Young Women Christian Association (YWCA) vs Dr.Arshad.P et al regarding eviction and damages for unauthorized use

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Tue, 01/15/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 01/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/S U.B. Hardwares regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sujith K.M. vs P. Chandramathi @ Chandrika et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Panakkal Mammedkoya vs Fabir et al regarding partition
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kalarikandy Subash Babu (died), Durga Devi, Bindya, Sandya vs Kasthuri Bai, Ramani Bai regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Moideen.V.P vs Pathumma et al regarding setting aside a final decree
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Civil Suit Defendant Won