Case Summary
Shyma, the plaintiff, has filed a suit against Kripaladas and Vilasini for a perpetual prohibitory injunction. The court ultimately dismissed the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Supporting Evidence
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shyma
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kripaladas
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vilasini
- Party Age
- 59
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.T.V.Sunil Kumar Basu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Irshad.P.P
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.P.Sreenesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Athira.K.K
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaint presented by the plaintiff under Section 26, Order VII, Rule 1 of CPC for perpetual prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shyma vs Kripaladas et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Shyma vs Kripaladas et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction