Case Summary
The plaintiffs, N.P.Haris and Sulaika, sought a mandatory injunction against the defendants, which included Achuthanandan and others. The case concluded with the court dismissing the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence. The defendants were present in court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- N.P.Haris
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sulaika
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Achuthanandan
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sarath
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vijaya Sankaran
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Visalakshi
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Indrakumaran
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.T.V.Sunil Kumar Basu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Vinod Singh Cheriyan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Plaintiff presented for mandatory injunction.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between N.P.Haris et al vs Achuthanandan et al regarding mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between N.P.Haris et al vs Achuthanandan et al regarding mandatory injunction