Case Summary
Haris C.P. filed an application for final decree regarding partition of property among legal heirs. The court reviewed the application and decided upon the allotment of shares as per the commissioner’s report.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Final decree for partition
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has accepted the advocate commissioner's report and allotted shares in the property among the parties as detailed in the plan.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The commissioner's report regarding partition was accepted, and all parties involved had no objections.
The commissioner's report regarding partition was accepted, and all parties involved had no objections.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The commissioner's report regarding partition was accepted, and all parties involved had no objections.
The commissioner's report regarding partition was accepted, and all parties involved had no objections.
Supporting Evidence
The commissioner has divided the property in a most equitable and convenient manner. It is also to be noted that the parties to the final decree have no objection to the report and the plan submitted by the Advocate Commissioner.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, Ext. C1 and C2 are accepted and a final decree for partition is passed as follows :-
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Haris C.P.
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shakkeela
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M. P. Samla
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M. T. Hafsa
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rasheeda T.
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Firsha V.
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Commission report submitted by Adv. T.K. Karunakaran, Plan submitted by Adv. T. K. Karunakaran
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. T.K. Sheeba
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. A.V. Anvar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Neethu K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Nikhila
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Final decree for partition of property
Evidence:
Thus, I find that Ext. C1 and C2 can be relied on to pass a final decree for partition in the above matter.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Allotment of shares in decree schedule property.
Evidence:
That plot 3 in Ext. C2 plan is allotted towards the share of petitioner/ Defendant No.4 and the right, title and possession over the same shall be vested with them.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commissioner Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The report submitted by the Advocate Commissioner which was relied on to pass the final decree for partition.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The plan submitted by the Advocate Commissioner which was used to determine the allotment of shares in the final decree.
Reference:
Ext.C2
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Haris C.P. vs Shakkeela et al regarding partition of property
Case Code Year
Case between Haris C.P. vs Shakkeela et al regarding partition of property