Case Summary
Sudheer Kumar is the plaintiff, and Sunilkumar and Suresh Kumar.V are the defendants. The plaintiff presented a suit for partition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was called absent. Hence, the suit was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff called absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Plaintiff called absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff called absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Plaintiff called absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was called absent.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sudheer Kumar
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sunilkumar
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suresh Kumar.V
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.M.Viswanathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.B.Kishore Bhaktha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P.M.Sasikumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Plaintiff called absent. Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sudheer Kumar vs Sunilkumar et al regarding patition.
Case Code Year
Case between Sudheer Kumar vs Sunilkumar et al regarding patition.