Case Summary
The case involves plaintiffs Amjad.C.S and Amith.C.S suing the defendant Aparna.P.M. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiffs were absent, while the defendant was present, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Amjad.C.S
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Amith.C.S
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aparna.P.M
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.T.Nandakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Pradeepan Kuthirote
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Amjad.C.S et al vs Aparna.P.M regarding suit for decree and judgment
Case Code Year
Case between Amjad.C.S et al vs Aparna.P.M regarding suit for decree and judgment