ORIGINAL SUIT No.429/2020

Case between K.Jayesh et al vs P.G.Gangadharan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court

COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE

Judge

Sri. Vivek P.

Order Date

2025-01-06

Duration

Case Closed

Mon, 01/06/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, K.Jayesh and Reena.C, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the court proceedings.

Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff absent.

Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff absent.

Supporting Evidence

Plaintiff absent.

Judgment Evidence:

This suit coming on this day for hearing before me in the presence of Sri.Ressal Rahiman, Advocate for the Plaintiffs and Sri.K.P.Gangadharan, Advocate for the Defendants, and this court delivered the following. IA 12/24 dismissed. Plaintiff absent. Defendant present. Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: K.Jayesh
Party Age: 42
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Reena.C
Party Age: 39
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: P.G.Gangadharan
Party Age: 75
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: M.K.Manjula
Party Age: 71
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.Ressal Rahiman
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.K.P.Gangadharan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Plaint presented by the plaintiff under Section 26, Order VII, Rule 1 of CPC for permanent prohibitory injunction.

Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification