Similar Cases
Based on: ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 546/2017 — Case between Madayi Usha et al vs Madayi Sivanandan et al regarding partition of properties
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
Original Suit No. 439/2023
Case between Muhammed Gasini et al vs Vaheeda Beevi regarding partition
The case involves a partition of property among the plaintiffs, who are the legal heirs of Mr. Muhammed Sidni, and the defendant, Vaheeda Beevi. The plaintiffs claim their rights over the property after the death of their mother, Mrs. Majida Beevi.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 110/2023
Case between Muhammed Ansar .P.K vs Punjab National Bank et al regarding dismissal for default.
Muhammed Ansar .P.K is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Punjab National Bank and Vinayan.M as defendants. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff did not turn up for exparte evidence.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
EP No. 222/2025
Case between M/s. Kerala Trade Wings et al vs Khaleelul Rahman regarding petition.
The case involves M/s. Kerala Trade Wings as the petitioners and Khaleelul Rahman as the respondent. It pertains to a petition for the transmission of a decree.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 362/2023
Case between IBK Engineering, EPC Private Ltd vs The Manager, Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd et al regarding arbitration.
The case involves IBK Engineering against Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd concerning a dispute that has been referred to arbitration. The proceedings were conducted with the representation of advocates for both parties.
Original Suit
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 619/2025
Case between Sam Santhosh vs All Kerala CBSE State Kalolsav Committee et al regarding dismissal of suit
The case involves Sam Santhosh, a minor represented by his father, against the All Kerala CBSE State Kalolsav Committee and Sahodaya School Complex. The plaintiff sought relief, but the suit was not pressed.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 209/2022
Case between City Co-operative Hospital Ltd. et al vs Abdul Hameed, Hairunnisa regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.
City Co-operative Hospital Ltd. is the plaintiff represented by its President, P. Moideen. The defendants are Abdul Hameed and Hairunnisa. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Original Suit
Dismissed
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 42 OF 2014
Case between Suhara vs Ameer Faizal et al regarding fixation of boundary, mandatory injunction, and recovery of possession
Involves Suhara suing Ameer Faizal et al for boundary fixation, mandatory injunction, and recovery of possession. Plaintiff claims ownership of a property purchased from Abdulla, facing disputes over boundaries and rights of way.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 301 of 2017
Case between C.P.Pocker vs Cholakka Pulikkaparambil Kuttirayu's children regarding Partition.
C.P.Pocker is the plaintiff seeking partition of property originally belonging to Kuttirayu, which has devolved to him and the defendants. The defendants have admitted the plaint claim through their written statement, leading to a judgment on admission.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 446/ 2018
Case between Ravi vs Ashokan et al regarding declaration and consequential permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Ravi and additional plaintiff Rajani, are siblings suing their brothers Ashokan and Sasi, and sister Remani over property rights following their parents' death. They seek to declare a settlement deed void and partition the property.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 507/2019
Case between Meenakshi vs Radha K.A. et al regarding mediation agreement
Meenakshi is the plaintiff seeking relief against Radha K.A. and other defendants. The court examined a mediation agreement entered into between the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 3.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No.27/2021
Case between Suharabi CP et al vs Hasna Muhammed regarding IA No.151/24
The petition involves Hasna Muhammed as the petitioner and Suharabi CP along with Kuruvattoor Grama Panchayath as respondents. The case pertains to an application that was allowed by the court.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 98/2018
Case between I. Babu et al vs Sun Office Automation Pvt. Ltd. regarding dismissal of suit based on mediation agreement
The plaintiffs, I. Babu and others, filed a suit against Sun Office Automation Pvt. Ltd. regarding the execution of a mediation agreement. The court found the terms lawful and executable.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 205/2024
Case between Mukkam Tyres et al vs St. George Orthodox Suryan Church et al regarding mediation agreement.
Mukkam Tyres and Sejin Kurian are the plaintiffs. The defendants are St. George Orthodox Suryan Church and Abi Abraham. The case was about a dispute that was settled through mediation.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.175/2018
Case between Lakshmikutty Amma et al vs Kozhikode City Service Co-operative Bank et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, a husband and wife, are seeking a declaration regarding their life interest in a property previously settled to their son, the second defendant. They claim that a loan taken by the second defendant against the property was unauthorized as their consent was not obtained.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 572 /2012
Case between E.S. Santhadevi et al vs Sarada et al regarding recovery of possession and declaration of property rights
E.S. Santhadevi and E.S. Maheshkumar, the plaintiffs, are seeking recovery of possession of property from the defendants, who include Sarada and others. The case revolves around property rights and alleged trespass by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 261/1999
Case between T.N. Devaki vs Padmanabhan Nair et al regarding setting aside the partition deed
The plaintiff, T.N. Devaki, seeks to set aside the partition deed claiming fraud and undue influence exerted by the defendants, who are her relatives. The case revolves around the legitimacy of the shares allotted to her in a disputed property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.744/2023
Case between Anil. E. P vs Samastha Kerala Jam-Iyyathul Muallimeen Central Council regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Anil. E. P is the plaintiff, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Samastha Kerala Jam-Iyyathul Muallimeen Central Council, the defendant. The plaintiff claims to be in possession of a property he leased and accuses the defendant of attempting to evict him unlawfully.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.208/2025
Case between Mohanan P.D vs The Manager, State Bank of India regarding declaration of valid title deed
The plaintiff, Mohanan P.D, filed a suit for declaration regarding the validity of a title deed after the original was reported destroyed. The defendant, State Bank of India, admitted the plaint claim in their written statement.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit Nos. 353/2024
Case between Shibu vs R. Rajagopalakrishnan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Shibu is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against R. Rajagopalakrishnan and others. The case arises from a dispute over property ownership and related claims.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 526/2025
Case between Usman. E vs N. K. Abdurahiman et al regarding declaration of document as null and void
Usman. E filed a suit against N. K. Abdurahiman and others for declaring a document as null and void and for its cancellation. The plaintiff claims that the defendants transferred property without proper consent, causing potential harm to the Priyadarshini Study Centre.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 95/2017
Case between Satheesh Charly vs The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Satheesh Charly, seeks a declaration regarding his membership status in The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club after being expelled. The defendants argue that he was suspended and subsequently expelled for repeated misconduct.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 275 / 2019
Case between Jose Antony vs K.D. Antony et al regarding declaration and consequential injunction.
Jose Antony is the plaintiff seeking a declaration that certain properties were purchased using his funds fraudulently by his father K.D. Antony and siblings. The case involves disputes over property ownership and claims of misrepresentation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.447/2019
Case between Muraleedharan vs Premanandan et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
Muraleedharan filed a suit against Premanandan and others regarding a boundary dispute and injunction related to property access. The plaintiff claims trespass by the defendants on the access way to his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 345/2016
Case between Thottathil Pachukutty et al vs Thottathil Sulochana et al regarding recovery of possession of immovable property and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Thottathil Pachukutty et al, claim ownership over a property from which the defendant, Thottathil Sulochana, allegedly encroached and constructed a house illegally. The case involves disputes over property boundaries and title.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 14 / 2021
Case between Girija vs Arunjith P et al regarding mandatory injunction and other connected reliefs.
Girija filed a suit against Arunjith P, Sasikumar P, and the Secretary of Thalakulathoor Grama Panchayath seeking a mandatory injunction for unauthorized construction on her property. The plaintiff claims the construction is illegal and seeks mesne profits for its usage.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.453/2022
Case between Hathikka KV vs Nisha regarding mandatory injunction and compensation.
Hathikka KV, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Nisha, the defendant, seeking a mandatory injunction to vacate the property used for unauthorized occupation and compensation for damages. The plaintiff claims the defendant has overstayed the agreement terms, and the property is needed for a medical shop.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.440/2023
Case between Elias Puthiya Panthakalakam vs Kamabi Puthiya Panthakalakam et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession.
Elias Puthiya Panthakalakam is the plaintiff seeking a declaration and recovery of possession of property gifted to him by his mother, Kamabi Puthiya Panthakalakam. The defendants are members of the plaintiff's family who dispute the validity of the gift.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 05 / 2020
Case between Shabna.K.P vs Khadeejumma et al regarding easement by prescription
The case involves Shabna.K.P claiming prescriptive easement rights over a pathway from the defendants, Khadeejumma and others. The plaintiff asserts prior usage of the path for over 70 years, while the defendants contest the claim.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 357/2021
Case between Prakasini K. vs Kamala et al regarding cancellation of document and partition
Prakasini K. filed a suit against Kamala and others for the cancellation of a partition deed and for partition of certain properties. The parties are siblings disputing their inheritance rights over the property left by their deceased father.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 308 OF 2014
Case between Abdulla vs Sainaba et al regarding undisclosed matter
Abdulla filed an original suit against multiple defendants at the Court of the Munsiff of Tirur. The suit was ongoing since 2014.
Original Suit
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 102 OF 2019
Case between Raveendran et al vs Thankamani et al regarding partition
Case between Raveendran and Karthiayani vs Thankamani, Geetha, Preethi, Shani, and Adharva regarding partition of the property owned jointly.
Partition
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 109 OF 2018
Case between Beevi et al vs Muhammedali et al regarding declaration.
The plaintiffs Beevi and others filed a suit for declaration against the defendants Muhammedali and another. The matter was settled in adalath and an award was passed.
Original Suit
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 120 OF 2018
Case between Deceased Kalpurath Kadar's children vs Deceased Kalpurath Kadar's children regarding partition
The case involves a dispute over the partition of property belonging to the deceased Kalpurath Kadar among his children and their legal heirs. The plaintiffs are seeking a decree for partition as the defendants were not willing to agree to a partition.
Partition Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 503 /2018
Case between Sharmila @ Sharmi vs Vinsa Paul et al regarding partition of property
The plaintiff, Sharmila @ Sharmi, is seeking a partition of property that she claims to co-own with the defendants, who are her late husband's family members. The defendants argue that the plaintiff relinquished her rights to the property and have filed a written statement contesting her claim.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 75/2024
Case between Jayanthilal P.M. et al vs Jainy Suresh et al regarding partition of property
This case involves a dispute over the partition of property originally belonging to Mr. P.G. Muraleedharan. The plaintiff Jayanthilal P.M. and the defendants, who are his relatives, seek a formal division of their inherited property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1226 /2017
Case between Dhanya Oppath vs Baby Girija et al regarding public auction of properties
The petitioner, Dhanya Oppath, seeks a public auction for the properties in the final decree application, claiming that the current valuations are undervalued. The respondents oppose this, asserting they are willing to purchase the properties as assessed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1473 / 2016
Case between Lakshmi Velu et al vs Venugopalan N V regarding partition of properties
The plaintiffs, including the widow and children of late Velu, are seeking a partition of properties following his intestate death. The defendant, another son of Velu, claims that a family settlement from 2004 has already resolved the matter.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 336/2023
Case between Sunil Mohammed vs Smt. Meherunnisa regarding declaration and partition
Sunil Mohammed and Smt. Meherunnisa, the children of P.A. Mohammed Kunju and Kadeeja Mohammed Kunju, are involved in a suit for declaration and partition of their ancestral property. The case revolves around the missing brother, Sajith Mohammed, and the need to declare him dead for partition purposes.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1158 /2013
Case between Rejitha Mol R., Renjitha Mol R. vs Renjith Kumar M.R, Geetha Reghunath regarding partition
The plaintiffs, Rejitha Mol R. and Renjitha Mol R., are the daughters of M.A. Raghunath, while the defendants are Renjith Kumar M.R, the son, and Geetha Reghunath, the wife. The case revolves around the partition of property belonging to their deceased father and allegations of misleading conduct by the first defendant regarding the execution of a partition deed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 10 / 2021
Case between Ammini et al vs Ajitha Sunil et al regarding partition
The plaintiffs, Ammini and her sons Suresh Kumar and Sudheesh Kumar, are seeking a partition of property that belonged to their deceased husband and father, Palliyan. The defendants are Ajitha Sunil, the wife of another deceased son, and her minor son, who are jointly entitled to the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.427/2021
Case between Rajesh Balakrishnan vs Sunitha Sundar et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Rajesh Balakrishnan, the plaintiff, seeks partition of property and injunction against his sister, her husband, and his mother. The dispute revolves around property inherited from their father.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 1308/2021
Case between Kerala Cricket Association (KCA) vs Eternal Sports Private Limited regarding dismissal for default.
The case involves the Kerala Cricket Association (KCA) as the plaintiff and Eternal Sports Private Limited as the defendant. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's lack of representation.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1256/2020
Case between Santhamma.S vs K. Sasidharan Nair regarding partition of property
Santhamma.S, the plaintiff, is the widow of Late Sri. Kesava Pillai @ Kesavan Nair and is seeking a partition of property she shares with her son, K. Sasidharan Nair, the defendant. The plaintiff claims rights to a larger share of the property but the court found her claims insufficient due to lack of critical documentation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.606/2019
Case between M. Lalitha @ Lalitha Rajagopal vs Surya Kumari et al regarding partition and permanent injunction.
The case involves a suit filed by M. Lalitha against Surya Kumari and her children for partition of property and a permanent injunction. The plaintiff claims co-ownership of the property inherited from their father, while the defendants contest this claim based on a will that they allege bequeathed the property to them.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 72/2025
Case between Shahida Beevi et al vs Nahas et al regarding joint compromise settlement.
The plaintiffs, led by Shahida Beevi, and defendants, led by Nahas, settled their disputes through out-of-court discussions. The joint compromise was accepted by the court, leading to the decree.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 80/2025
Case between M/s. Poorna Printing and Publishing House vs Pala Ninna Poika Residence Association et al regarding dismissal of suit
M/s. Poorna Printing and Publishing House filed a suit against Pala Ninna Poika Residence Association and several defendants. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 15/2025
Case between M/s. S.R. Educational and Charitable Trust et al vs M/S Asset Reconstructions Company (India) Ltd. regarding withdrawal of suit
M/s. S.R. Educational and Charitable Trust and its Chairman, Shaji R., are involved in a suit against M/S Asset Reconstructions Company (India) Ltd. The plaintiffs are permitted to withdraw the suit as per the court's order.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 243/2014
Case between Sulatha vs Reetha regarding default dismissal
The case involves a dispute between Sulatha and Reetha. Both parties were represented in court, but the suit was dismissed for default due to no steps taken for adducing evidence.
Original Suit
Defendant Won