Case Summary
Usman. E filed a suit against N. K. Abdurahiman and others for declaring a document as null and void and for its cancellation. The plaintiff claims that the defendants transferred property without proper consent, causing potential harm to the Priyadarshini Study Centre.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The document No 355/2010 of SRO Mukkom is declared null and void. The defendants are ordered to pay costs to the plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court declared the document No 355/2010 of SRO Mukkom as null and void, granting the relief sought by the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence of the plaintiff remained unchallenged, indicating that the document in question was created without proper consent.
The evidence of the plaintiff remained unchallenged, indicating that the document in question was created without proper consent.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence of the plaintiff remained unchallenged, indicating that the document in question was created without proper consent.
The evidence of the plaintiff remained unchallenged, indicating that the document in question was created without proper consent.
Supporting Evidence
PW1 has deposed in tune with the plaint averments. His evidence remains unchallenged, indicating that the document was created without the knowledge of the society members.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows:- 1. The document No 355/2010 of SRO Mukkom is hereby declared to be null and void.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Usman. E
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- N. K. Abdurahiman
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ramesh Chennithala
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of deed No.3245/2003, Certified copy of deed No.983/2002, Certified copy of deed No.355/2010
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Noushad Kallada
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The document No 355/2010 of SRO Mukkom is declared to be null and void.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows:- 1. The document No 355/2010 of SRO Mukkom is hereby declared to be null and void.
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendants shall pay costs of the proceedings to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendants shall pay costs of the proceedings to the plaintiff.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Certified Copy of Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Exhibit A1 is the certified copy of the deed No 3245/2003 of SRO Mukkam.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Certified Copy of Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Exhibit A2 is the certified copy of deed No 983/2002 of SRO Mukkam.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Certified Copy of Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Exhibit A3 is the certified copy of the deed No 355/2010 of SRO Mukkam.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Fraudulent transfer
Case Code
Case between Usman. E vs N. K. Abdurahiman et al regarding declaration of document as null and void
Case Code Year
Case between Usman. E vs N. K. Abdurahiman et al regarding declaration of document as null and void