Case between Anil. E. P vs Samastha Kerala Jam-Iyyathul Muallimeen Central Council regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Case Summary

Anil. E. P is the plaintiff, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Samastha Kerala Jam-Iyyathul Muallimeen Central Council, the defendant. The plaintiff claims to be in possession of a property he leased and accuses the defendant of attempting to evict him unlawfully.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant from dispossessing the plaintiff from the property without due process.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Permanent prohibitory injunction and cost of the proceedings

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

No

The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant from dispossessing the plaintiff from the property without due process.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved his case through unchallenged oral testimony and supporting documents.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved his case through unchallenged oral testimony and supporting documents.

Supporting Evidence

The case of the plaintiff is proved by his unchallenged oral testimony and the documents produced.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1.The defendant, their men and agent are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from dispossessing and evicting the plaintiff from the plaint schedule property otherwise than by due process of law.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Anil. E. P
Party Age: 48
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Samastha Kerala Jam-Iyyathul Muallimeen Central Council (SKJMCC)
Relation: Rep by its President

Plaintiffs Documents

Photocopy of lease agreement dated 01.08.2000, Letter dated 28.08.2023

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.D.Mohandas
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Harsha. K.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. K. M. Musthafa
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Zameel. K. T
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

The defendant, their men and agent are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from dispossessing and evicting the plaintiff from the plaint schedule property.

Evidence:

In the result, 1.The defendant, their men and agent are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from dispossessing and evicting the plaintiff from the plaint schedule property other wise than by due process of law.

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Granted

Description:

The defendant shall also pay cost of the proceedings to the plaintiff.

Evidence:

The defendant shall also pay cost of the proceedings to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Photocopy of lease agreement

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

Ext.A1 is the photocopy of lease agreement dated 01.08.2000 provided to prove the tenancy of the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property.

Reference:

Ext.A1

Document Type: Letter

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

Ext.A2 is the letter dated 28.08.2023 sent by the plaintiff to the defendant, supporting the claim for relief.