Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 05 / 2020

Case between Shabna.K.P vs Khadeejumma et al regarding easement by prescription

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.Ancy.T
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration
approximately-5 years 1 month
Case Closed
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Shabna.K.P claiming prescriptive easement rights over a pathway from the defendants, Khadeejumma and others. The plaintiff asserts prior usage of the path for over 70 years, while the defendants contest the claim.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, granting declared easement rights over the contested pathway and imposing a permanent injunction against the defendants obstructing its use.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Easement by prescription over plaint C schedule property and a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, granting declared easement rights over the contested pathway and imposing a permanent injunction against the defendants obstructing its use.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs convincingly proved their claim of prescriptive easement rights over the disputed pathway.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs convincingly proved their claim of prescriptive easement rights over the disputed pathway.
Supporting Evidence
The documentation and evidence presented by the plaintiffs corroborated their usage of the path and established their rights under the Indian Easements Act, thereby displacing the burden of proof onto the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. It is hereby declared that the plaintiffs are entitled for easement by prescription over plaint C schedule property. 2. The defendants are hereby restrained by an order of permanent prohibitory injunction from obstructing the user of plaint C schedule pathway by the plaintiffs as an access to plaint A schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shabna.K.P
Party Age
35
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Khadeejumma
Party Age
76
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Koya
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ayoob
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ayishabi
Party Age
49
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saleem
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Registered Jenmam assignment deed No.2800/97, Registered Jenmam assignment deed No.2877/04, Lan Tax receipt, Possession certificate.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Bijesh.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.P..Mayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Sreeraj.P.N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Relief of easement by prescription over plaint C schedule property
Evidence:
It is hereby declared that the plaintiffs are entitled for easement by prescription over plaint C schedule property.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction from obstructing the user of plaint C schedule pathway
Evidence:
The defendants are hereby restrained by an order of permanent prohibitory injunction from obstructing the user of plaint C schedule pathway by the plaintiffs as an access to plaint A schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Assignment deed of plaint A schedule property
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Title deed of plaint A schedule property
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt issued to the plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Possession certificate issued to the plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report identifying the disputed pathway
Reference:
C1 series
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Second commission report with sketches identifying the disputed pathway
Reference:
C2 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Prescriptive easement
Case Code
Case between Shabna.K.P vs Khadeejumma et al regarding easement by prescription
Case Code Year
Case between Shabna.K.P vs Khadeejumma et al regarding easement by prescription

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Fri, 02/28/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Madayi Usha et al vs Madayi Sivanandan et al regarding partition of properties
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Original Suit Partial
Case between Prakasini K. vs Kamala et al regarding cancellation of document and partition
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Meenakshi vs Radha K.A. et al regarding mediation agreement
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank, Kakkodi Branch, et al vs Sanith P., Somasundaran M. regarding settlement of dispute.
The Court of the Additional Munsiff-I, Kozhikode
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Peradi Puthukudi Padmini Amma et al vs Kolappalli Kolasseri Abdulla regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Original Suit Dismissed