Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 95/2017

Case between Satheesh Charly vs The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-03-15
Duration
approximately-8 years 10 months
Case Closed
Sat, 03/15/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Satheesh Charly, seeks a declaration regarding his membership status in The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club after being expelled. The defendants argue that he was suspended and subsequently expelled for repeated misconduct.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit, confirming that the plaintiff is not a member of The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit, confirming that the plaintiff is not a member of The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that all procedures were duly followed regarding the plaintiff’s expulsion.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that all procedures were duly followed regarding the plaintiff’s expulsion.
Supporting Evidence
On meticulous evaluation of the evidence tendered by PW1 and DW1, it was found that the proceedings which led to the suspension and expulsion of PW1 have complied with all formalities.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Satheesh Charly
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tony Mathew
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Bye-laws of management committee of Calicut Cosmopolitan Club, Show cause Notice issued by Secretary Calicut Cosmopolitan Club to Sathish Charly, Suspension notice (Original).
Defendants Documents
Minutes book of the Calicut Cosmopolitan Club, Show cause notice sent by Secretary to Sathish Charly.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. T.V. Pradeep Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P.N. Sreenivasan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought a declaration that the notice of suspension is null and void.
Evidence:
The court held that the plaintiff is not entitled to a decree for declaration.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought a consequential injunction against his expulsion.
Evidence:
The court found that the plaintiff's claims were denied and that he was not entitled to any injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Byelaw of the first defendant club
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relied upon by the plaintiff to prove claims regarding membership and suspension.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Show Cause Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued to the plaintiff calling for an explanation regarding misconduct.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Reply of notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's response to the show cause notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Reply of notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Response from the Secretary of the club to the plaintiff's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Reply of notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further response by the plaintiff to the Secretary's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Suspension Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Official notice issued to the plaintiff regarding his suspension.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Letter from the Secretary to the plaintiff extending suspension.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Minutes Book
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Documented proceedings of club meetings related to membership and decisions regarding the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Minutes of Meeting
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Page from minutes documenting a meeting held on 18.2.2017.
Reference:
Ext.B1(a)
Document Type: Minutes of Meeting
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Page from minutes documenting a meeting held on 4.07.2018.
Reference:
Ext.B1(b)
Document Type: Minutes of Meeting
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Page from minutes documenting the decision of the Managing Committee to expel the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.B1(c)
Document Type: Show Cause Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Issued to the plaintiff for his actions during his membership.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Notifying the plaintiff of his expulsion from the club.
Reference:
Ext.B8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Mismanagement of club affairs
Case Code
Case between Satheesh Charly vs The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Satheesh Charly vs The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Wed, 03/15/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 03/15/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Hathikka KV vs Nisha regarding mandatory injunction and compensation.
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Girija vs Arunjith P et al regarding mandatory injunction and other connected reliefs.
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thottathil Pachukutty et al vs Thottathil Sulochana et al regarding recovery of possession of immovable property and mandatory injunction.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Muraleedharan vs Premanandan et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jose Antony vs K.D. Antony et al regarding declaration and consequential injunction.
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won