Similar Cases
Based on: OS.No.163/2024 — Case between Sarah Ann Koshy et al vs M/s Cloud 9 Apartment Owner’s Association et al regarding temporary injunction.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
O.S. No.1510/2021
Case between Sanish Sivanandan et al vs Sivaji Sapphire Apartment Owners Association et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Sanish Sivanandan and his wife Renjini R Nair are the plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Sivaji Sapphire Apartment Owners Association and its representatives. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants have obstructed their renovation work and have issued defamatory statements against them.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1112/2023
Case between Thomas.P. Oommen et al vs Favourite Homes Vintage Luxury Apartment Owners Association et al regarding declaration, permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs.
The plaintiffs, Thomas.P. Oommen and Dr. George Varughese, are owners in an apartment complex and are challenging the validity of a new clause that imposes equal maintenance charges irrespective of the flat sizes. The defendants are the apartment owners association and its secretary.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.994/2022
Case between Thulaseedharan.B. vs Bindu et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
The petitioner, Thulaseedharan.B., filed a petition for a temporary prohibitory injunction against defendants Bindu and Geetha regarding an alleged trespass on his property. The case revolves around property ownership disputes and the right to construct on adjacent lands.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.138 /2019
Case between Syed Mohammed Sadik vs Suresh Babu. R.C regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.
Syed Mohammed Sadik and Suresh Babu. R.C are involved in two interconnected suits regarding property disputes over a pathway. The plaintiff claims that the defendant illegally encroached upon the pathway, reducing its width.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.549/2017
Case between Dr. Aggy. S. Valentine vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory injunction and other reliefs
The plaintiff, Dr. Aggy. S. Valentine, alleges that the defendants unlawfully demolished her compound wall and trespassed on her property. The case revolves around her request for a mandatory injunction to restore her property and prevent further unauthorized actions by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.509/2016
Case between K. Somasekhara Pillai vs Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, K. Somasekhara Pillai, is involved in a dispute over property rights with the defendants, including the Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram. He claims they unlawfully entered his property and cut down coconut trees, leading to a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.507/2014
Case between T.Sarojam et al vs Santhamma et al regarding fixation and putting up of boundary and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, T.Sarojam and others, filed a suit against the defendants, Santhamma and others, seeking to fix boundaries and prevent the defendants from trespassing on their property. The plaintiffs' predecessor had ownership of the property, but the defendants attempted to create rights over it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1236/2020
Case between Divya Kumar.P vs Peethambaran et al regarding recovery of possession and mesne profits.
Divya Kumar.P is seeking recovery of possession of her property from her parents and sister, who are currently residing there. The plaintiff contends that the defendants are in illegal possession and has filed this suit after her attempts to evict them were unsuccessful.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.242/2020
Case between Rajendran vs The City Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Rajendran, is seeking a prohibitory injunction against the City Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram to prevent them from removing a portable bunk he claims to own. The defendant contends that the installation of this bunk is illegal and the plaintiff does not have the required license.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.658/2019
Case between Shaji P.R vs Rajani regarding removal of encroachment and restoration of pathway
Shaji P.R filed a suit against his sister Rajani for the removal of an encroachment and restoration of a pathway that provides access to his property. The defendant allegedly constructed a wall blocking the pathway, which the plaintiff claims has caused him hardship.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.476/2021
Case between Dayanandan vs Anila Kumari et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Dayanandan, the absolute owner of a property, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against his sisters and nephew who attempted to trespass onto his property. The court found that the plaintiff was not entitled to relief due to suppression of facts.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.2384/2014
Case between Shibu et al vs Bindhu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and other consequential reliefs.
The plaintiffs, Shibu and Sekharan, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Bindhu, Biju, and Thankamoni, concerning a dispute over property access and construction. The case also has a counterclaim where Bindhu, the plaintiff in the second suit, contends against Shibu and Sekharan regarding property declaration and injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 569/2019
Case between Sarith. S. vs Yasoram Pancharatna Apartment Owners Association regarding declaration and Injunction
Sarith. S., the plaintiff, seeks a declaration and injunction regarding necessary repairs to his apartment and common areas. The Yasoram Pancharatna Apartment Owners Association, the defendant, opposes these repairs, claiming they violate ownership agreements.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 651 /20 25
Case between Reena Philip vs Sachin V Visavadia, Tony Thomas regarding interim mandatory injunction
Reena Philip has filed a petition against Sachin V Visavadia and Tony Thomas, who are the President and Secretary of the Purva Eternity Apartment Owners Association. The case involves a dispute over the imposition of late payment penalties and access to common amenities in the residential project 'Purva Eternity.'
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1663/2024
Case between Dr. Renuka K et al vs Sowparnika Vaishnavam Apartment Owners Association et al regarding temporary injunction
The petitioners are apartment owners seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents, who are the apartment owners' association, to prevent them from interfering with the peaceful possession of tenants. The case involves allegations of mismanagement and improper convening of meetings by the association.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No.1663/2024
Case between Dr. Renuka K et al vs Sowparnika Vaishnavam Apartment Owners Association et al regarding mandatory injunction and other reliefs
This case involves a dispute between the residents of Sowparnika Vaishnavam Apartments and the apartment owners association regarding the payment of monthly maintenance charges. The plaintiffs argue that they are willing to pay but require proper account statements from the association.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.504/2015
Case between Ramesan vs Sujatha et al regarding partition of ancestral property.
The plaintiff Ramesan seeks a partition of the ancestral property claimed jointly with the defendants, who are siblings. The case arises from disputes over the joint possession and ownership of property following the death of their mother.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1295/2023
Case between Aravindan Nair et al vs Ramachandran Nair et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, who are siblings, sought a partition of property from the defendants, also siblings, after the death of their sister. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants were obstructing their rights to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.377/2017
Case between Nazarudeen. A vs Tom.D et al regarding suit for declaration, recovery of possession, and injunction
The plaintiffs, Nazarudeen. A and Laila Beegum, are husband and wife seeking legal remedies for property encroachment. The defendants, Tom.D and Johnson, are accused of unlawfully taking possession of a portion of the plaintiffs' property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.772/2021
Case between Sarathchandran Nair.J vs Government of India et al regarding boundary measurement and injunction
The petitioner Sarathchandran Nair is seeking to measure and demarcate certain properties against the defendants, which include the Government of India and the Indian Coast Guard. The defendants dispute the plaintiff's claims over the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.637/2015
Case between R. Saroja vs Sivathanu @ Murugan et al regarding partition of plaint schedule properties.
R. Saroja filed a suit for partition of properties originally belonging to her deceased mother and grandmother against Sivathanu @ Murugan and others. The plaintiff claims her share was not properly recognized in prior partition arrangements.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.134/2014
Case between Sathya Bhama et al vs Surendran et al regarding setting aside a sale deed
The plaintiff, Sathya Bhama, claims that the first defendant fraudulently obtained her property while she was suffering from a mental condition. The case seeks to set aside the sale deed executed in favor of Surendran, the first defendant.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1407/2015
Case between Susheela Devi. B. et al vs Anil Kumar et al regarding putting up of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, including the deceased Susheela Devi, are seeking to establish property boundaries and prevent the defendants from encroaching on their land. The defendants have previously trespassed and caused damage to the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1687/2013
Case between Valsala vs Sasidharan Nadar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Valsala, claims ownership and access rights to a pathway leading to her property, which the defendants, Sasidharan Nadar and his daughter Soumya, are obstructing. The defendants dispute these claims and argue that the plaintiff has no right over the pathway.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1785/2018
Case between Ajithkhan et al vs Directorate of Factories & Boilers et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Ajithkhan, Anupkhan, and Ayubkhan, are children of Smt. Khadeejabeevi and Sri. Safarulla, seeking to prevent the defendants, including the Directorate of Factories & Boilers, from obstructing their right to use a pathway. The dispute revolves around the use of a pathway claimed by both parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.427/2021
Case between Rajesh Balakrishnan vs Sunitha Sundar et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Rajesh Balakrishnan, the plaintiff, seeks partition of property and injunction against his sister, her husband, and his mother. The dispute revolves around property inherited from their father.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.396/2013
Case between Bindhu.T vs Prasad regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Bindhu.T, seeks a decree for the fixation of boundaries and a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Prasad, who is encroaching on her property. The defendant contends that there has been no encroachment and seeks dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.783/2020
Case between Gladstone.D et al vs Lilibai et al regarding partition and injunction.
The plaintiffs, descendants of Sri. Daveed, sought partition of a property after his death. The defendants, descendants of another legal heir, challenged the plaintiffs' claims, leading to a legal dispute over property ownership and injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.1196/2012
Case between Aloysius E.Gomez et al vs Maglin Lobo regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Aloysius E. Gomez and his wife Mary Lobo filed a suit against Maglin Lobo regarding obstruction in a public pathway. The plaintiffs sought a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendant from constructing a roof over a portion of the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1214/2014
Case between Madathuvilakam Ilangam Temple et al vs Rajan et al regarding settlement scheme and injunction
The plaintiffs, including the Madathuvilakam Ilangam Temple, are seeking a settlement scheme and permanent injunction against the defendants who are mismanaging the temple. The case involves disputes over the administration and enjoyment of property associated with the family temple.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.48/2025
Case between Govind.D.C vs Adhul et al regarding trespassing and injunction
Govind.D.C, the plaintiff, is seeking an injunction against Adhul, Salim, and the BCG Horizon Association to prevent them from trespassing into his property. The defendants claim the right to the common areas as a registered association.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.475/2021
Case between Vinod S Nair vs Sini Shafeekh et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Vinod S Nair, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Sini Shafeekh and others regarding the possession of a vehicle and allegations of fraud. The plaintiff claimed that he is entitled to possess a vehicle due to an agreement with the defendants, while the defendants denied any such agreement and raised various counterclaims.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1063/2014
Case between Sathi.V vs Francis et al regarding recovery of possession and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs are the legal heirs of the deceased Reghu Kumar, seeking to recover possession of property from the defendants, who they claim are trespassers. The case involves issues of ownership and entitlement to the property after the death of the real owner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.387/2021
Case between Saji David vs Shibu David regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Saji David filed a suit against his brother Shibu David for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The dispute arose over a property partitioned between them after their mother's death, with the plaintiff claiming the defendant is obstructing his possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1426/2019
Case between Sreekala vs Milton Leen Fernandez et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Sreekala, the plaintiff, filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against Milton Leen Fernandez and his wife, Shynymole Varghese. The plaintiff claims unlawful interference by the defendants in her peaceful possession and enjoyment of her properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.283/2018
Case between Nimmy Manuel et al vs Regional Head, Federal Bank Limited et al regarding declaration of title and other reliefs
The plaintiffs are the legal heirs of Sri. T.V. Manuel who died on 20/06/2010. They filed a suit to operate a locker that the deceased had with Federal Bank, which the bank denies due to a nominee claim by the third defendant.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.1003/2024
Case between Omana et al vs Sivakumar et al regarding boundary and injunction.
The plaintiffs, Omana and Shalini, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Sivakumar, Geetha Kumari, and Vasanthakumari, regarding trespass and the construction of compound walls on their property. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants have been illegally trespassing onto their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.572/2021
Case between Abdul Rahim vs Suneesh.S.Anand regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, Abdul Rahim and Abdul Latheef, claim ownership of property and seek a mandatory injunction against the defendant, Suneesh.S.Anand, related to a lease agreement that they argue is void due to non-compliance. The defendant contends the suit is not maintainable, citing issues with the lease's validity and a claim for a refund of a security deposit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.240/2023
Case between Sree Narayana Bhaktha Janasamithi et al vs Sreekumar. S et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves the Sree Narayana Bhaktha Janasamithi and its president Jagannathan against defendants Sreekumar. S and Rejith.S. The plaintiffs sought a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from interfering with the administration and renovation works of a family temple.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.425/2023
Case between Chithra.L vs Noorjahan regarding declaration, fixation of boundary, and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Chithra.L and her daughter Radhu, are seeking a declaration of their easementary right and an injunction against the defendant, Noorjahan, regarding property access issues. The plaintiffs allege the defendant attempted to obstruct their access to their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1430/2023
Case between Shiras Majeed vs Arun.R et al regarding recovery of possession.
Shiras Majeed filed a suit against Arun.R and Ajayakumar for recovery of possession of a house and property that he claims belongs to him. The defendants resided in the property without his consent, prompting the plaintiff to seek legal eviction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1256/2020
Case between Santhamma.S vs K. Sasidharan Nair regarding partition of property
Santhamma.S, the plaintiff, is the widow of Late Sri. Kesava Pillai @ Kesavan Nair and is seeking a partition of property she shares with her son, K. Sasidharan Nair, the defendant. The plaintiff claims rights to a larger share of the property but the court found her claims insufficient due to lack of critical documentation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1563/2024
Case between T.S. Jayaprakash vs M/s Adrak Builders& Developers Pvt. LTD. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
T.S. Jayaprakash, the plaintiff, claims that M/s Adrak Builders& Developers Pvt. LTD. has unlawfully grabbed his property. The case involves determining the rights over certain properties and includes applications for the appointment of a commissioner and surveyor.
Civil Suit
OS. No.1276/2016
Case between Dr. Abraham George Plavelil vs S. Ambili et al regarding mandatory injunction and consequential reliefs.
The plaintiff, Dr. Abraham George Plavelil, is seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants, S. Ambili and V. Thankappan Nadar, who are occupying the plaint schedule property that he claims ownership over. The defendants allegedly obstructed the plaintiff's access to the property after the death of his father.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.160/2023
Case between M/s. Attukal Shopping Complex Pvt. Ltd vs City Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs.
M/s. Attukal Shopping Complex Pvt. Ltd filed a suit against the City Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram seeking a permanent injunction. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant is wrongfully renewing D&O licenses for former licensees without the required consent after termination of their licenses.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1677/2013
Case between Surendran Nair vs S. Jayakumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and setting aside a Will
The case involves Surendran Nair as the plaintiff, who claims ownership of property based on a Will executed by Smt. Rajamma. The defendants, including S. Jayakumar and others, are contesting the validity of the Will and asserting their own rights over the property, alleging fraud and undue influence.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1677/2013
Case between Surendran Nair vs S. Jayakumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and setting aside a Will
Surendran Nair is the plaintiff in a suit against S. Jayakumar and others, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction and claiming ownership of a property by virtue of a Will executed in his favor. The defendants are contesting the validity of the Will and claiming rights over the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.761/2020
Case between Umadevi. G vs Hareendranath G.S regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Umadevi. G filed a suit against her brother Hareendranath G.S for partitioning their inherited properties and seeking a prohibitory injunction against any construction. The suit arose due to conflicts over the properties acquired by their deceased parents.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won