Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.163/2024

Case between Sarah Ann Koshy et al vs M/s Cloud 9 Apartment Owner’s Association et al regarding temporary injunction.

Court
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-07-05
Duration
approximately-2 years 0 days
Case Code No.
163
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Sarah Ann Koshy and Sony George, are joint owners of flat No.2B in Cloud 9 Apartment and seek to prevent the defendants from obstructing their access to a terrace area. The defendants, representing the apartment owners' association, argue that the plaintiffs unlawfully trespassed into a restricted common area.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the application for temporary injunction, restraining the plaintiffs from entering and using the terrace area above the car porch of the apartment.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
The counter petitioners/plaintiffs are restrained from entering and using the 736 sq. ft. terrace area above the car porch of the cloud 9 apartment.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the application for temporary injunction, restraining the plaintiffs from entering and using the terrace area above the car porch of the apartment.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner has made out a prima facie case in his favour. Balance of convenience is also in favour of petitioner.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner has made out a prima facie case in his favour. Balance of convenience is also in favour of petitioner.
Supporting Evidence
Hence for the aforesaid reasons, I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a prima facie case in his favour. Balance of convenience is also in favour of petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, I.A stands allowed as follows: 1) The counter petitioners/plaintiffs are restrained from entering and using the 736 sq. ft. terrace area above the car porch of the cloud 9 apartment.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sarah Ann Koshy
Party Age
43
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sony George
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Cloud 9 Apartment Owner’s Association
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The President, Cloud 9 Apartment Owner’s Association
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale deed No.300/2010 of SRO, Thiruvananthapuram
Defendants Documents
Sale deed No.300/2010 of SRO, Thiruvananthapuram

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Kollamcode.D.S.Jayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Sidharatha.S.Shine
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.R.Narendran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.N.Chandrasekharan Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.R.Anil Kumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraining the plaintiffs from entering and using the 736 sq. ft. terrace area above the car porch.
Evidence:
I.A stands allowed as follows: The counter petitioners/plaintiffs are restrained from entering and using the 736 sq. ft. terrace area above the car porch of the cloud 9 apartment.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Attested copy of sale deed for flat Nos. 7A and 7B presented to support the petitioner's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Attested copy of sale deed for flat Nos. 7A and 7B presented to support the petitioner's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of Petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the pre-litigation petition filed against the illegal act of the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of e-mail
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of email sent to the respondents to remove the plants from the petition schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified copy of the sale deed for flat No. 2B presented to support the respondent's claim of ownership.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report by advocate commissioner detailing the access and condition of the petition schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 06/29/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Apartment Owners Association

Similar Cases

Case between Thomas.P. Oommen et al vs Favourite Homes Vintage Luxury Apartment Owners Association et al regarding declaration, permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. Aggy. S. Valentine vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory injunction and other reliefs
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Syed Mohammed Sadik vs Suresh Babu. R.C regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thulaseedharan.B. vs Bindu et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Court of Additional Munsiff (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sanish Sivanandan et al vs Sivaji Sapphire Apartment Owners Association et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Court of Additional Munsiff-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won