Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.761/2020

Case between Umadevi. G vs Hareendranath G.S regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
Court of Principal Munsiff
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-10-22
Duration
approximately-5 years 7 months
Case Code No.
761
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Umadevi. G filed a suit against her brother Hareendranath G.S for partitioning their inherited properties and seeking a prohibitory injunction against any construction. The suit arose due to conflicts over the properties acquired by their deceased parents.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that Umadevi. G and Hareendranath G.S are entitled to equal shares of the inherited properties. The relief for a permanent injunction was denied due to insufficient evidence of threat from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A preliminary decree for partition of the plaint ‘A’ and ‘B’ schedule properties is granted.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that Umadevi. G and Hareendranath G.S are entitled to equal shares of the inherited properties. The relief for a permanent injunction was denied due to insufficient evidence of threat from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant admitted to having no objection to the partition of the properties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendant admitted to having no objection to the partition of the properties.
Supporting Evidence
The documents marked as Ext.A1 and Ext.A2 conclusively establish that title to these properties stood in the names of the PW1’s mother and both parents, respectively.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; The suit is partly decreed as follows: (b) A preliminary decree for partition of the plaint ‘A’ and ‘B’ schedule properties by metes and bounds is granted. (c) The plaintiff and the defendant are entitled to get 1/2 shares each over plaint ‘A’ and ‘B’ schedule properties.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Umadevi. G
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hareendranath G.S
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of the Sale deed No. 1801/1981, Certified copy of the Sale deed No. 3249/1982, Tax receipt, Building tax receipt, Original death certificate of Sri. Narayani Gopi, Original death certificate of Smt. Sukumari.T.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.Premjith Palazhy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendant from demolishing the existing building or undertaking new construction.
Evidence:
This Court finds that the plaintiff is not entitled to the permanent injunction as prayed for.
Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought a preliminary decree for partition and separate possession of her half share in the plaint schedule properties.
Evidence:
Accordingly, this Court finds that the plaintiff is entitled to a preliminary decree for partition and separate possession of her one-half share in the plaint schedule properties.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the sale deed registered in the name of the plaintiff's mother for plaint schedule 'A' property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the sale deed registered in the names of the plaintiff’s parents for plaint schedule 'B' property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land tax receipt for plaint 'A' and 'B' schedule properties.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land tax receipt for plaint 'A' and 'B' schedule properties.
Reference:
Ext.A3(a)
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Building tax receipt for the house situated on the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original death certificate of the plaintiff's father.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original death certificate of the plaintiff's mother.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 02/28/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between R. Saroja vs Sivathanu @ Murugan et al regarding partition of plaint schedule properties.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sarathchandran Nair.J vs Government of India et al regarding boundary measurement and injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nazarudeen. A vs Tom.D et al regarding suit for declaration, recovery of possession, and injunction
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aravindan Nair et al vs Ramachandran Nair et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ramesan vs Sujatha et al regarding partition of ancestral property.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won