Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.772/2021

Case between Sarathchandran Nair.J vs Government of India et al regarding boundary measurement and injunction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-01-21
Duration
approximately-1 year 1 month
Case Code No.
772
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner Sarathchandran Nair is seeking to measure and demarcate certain properties against the defendants, which include the Government of India and the Indian Coast Guard. The defendants dispute the plaintiff's claims over the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The application for measurement was allowed, and an advocate commissioner along with a surveyor were appointed to assist in determining the boundaries of the disputed properties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of advocate commissioner and surveyor to measure and demarcate properties.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The application for measurement was allowed, and an advocate commissioner along with a surveyor were appointed to assist in determining the boundaries of the disputed properties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found it necessary to ascertain the nature and extent of the disputed properties for proper disposal of the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Considering the nature of relief sought for it is necessary that the property is to be measured out with the help of a advocate commissioner and surveyor.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, I.A allowed. Advocate Sidharth is appointed as advocate commissioner and Sri. D.K. Ramesh is appointed as surveyor to assist the advocate commissioner.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sarathchandran Nair.J
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Government of India
Relation
represented by Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Chief Commander, Indian Coast Guard
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Indian Coast Guard
Relation
represented by the Defense Estate Officer
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala
Relation
represented by the District Collector
Plaintiffs Documents
Deed Nos.3576/2018, 3405/2018
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V.S.Bhasurendran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Prasanth Pai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Rahmathullah.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Nithika Sara Zacharia
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.B.R.Syam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.Salahudeen
Appearance Type
Government Pleader

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Relief sought for measuring and demarcating the plaint schedule properties.
Evidence:
Therefore it is quite clear that the present suit is filed for putting up of boundary and an advocate commissioner and surveyor is to be appointed to measure out the plaint schedule property and ascertain the lie, nature and extent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to measure and demarcate the plaint B and D schedule properties.
Reference:
Deed Nos.3576/2018 and 3405/2018

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Boundary Dispute
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Government of India

Similar Cases

Case between Thulaseedharan.B. vs Bindu et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Court of Additional Munsiff (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between R. Saroja vs Sivathanu @ Murugan et al regarding partition of plaint schedule properties.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Nazarudeen. A vs Tom.D et al regarding suit for declaration, recovery of possession, and injunction
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aravindan Nair et al vs Ramachandran Nair et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ramesan vs Sujatha et al regarding partition of ancestral property.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won