Similar Cases
Based on: O.S.No.769/2019 — Case between M/s Aakash Educational Services Limited vs Dr Vijayan Baburaj et al regarding suit dismissal
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
O.S.No.704/2017
Case between W. Selvaraj vs Sam Raj et al regarding rejection of plaint
W. Selvaraj is the plaintiff who brought the case against Sam Raj and Kala Suresh regarding a civil matter. The court found the plaintiff absent with no representation and rejected the plaint due to non-payment of court fees.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.624/2017
Case between A.Padmanabhan vs A.Rajendran Nair regarding dismissal of suit
A.Padmanabhan filed a suit against A.Rajendran Nair. The plaintiff stated that the matter has been settled and is no longer pursuing the case.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.1878/2017
Case between Vivian Jolly et al vs N Pushpakumaran Nair regarding dismissal of suit
The plaintiffs, represented by Vivian Jolly et al, brought a suit against the defendant, N Pushpakumaran Nair. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.1896/2024
Case between Abhilash A S vs Vishnu P Rajasekharan regarding dismissal of suit
The case involves the plaintiff Abhilash A S, who has filed a suit against the defendant Vishnu P Rajasekharan. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.86/2023
Case between Shibukumar vs Krishnan Nair regarding plaint rejection
Shibukumar filed a suit against Krishnan Nair regarding a civil matter. The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of court fees.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.825/2020
Case between Nimmi K vs Sunil Stanley et al regarding dismissal for default
Nimmi K is the plaintiff, and Sunil Stanley, Mohan, and Rajee R are the defendants. The suit is dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and did not provide any affidavit or application for adjournment.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.1473/2019
Case between P.J.Bencily et al vs Devaki regarding raising the height of a wall
The plaintiffs, P.J. Bencily and Mary Seena, are seeking to raise the height of their wall due to disturbances caused by the defendant, Devaki. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence and did not qualify for the relief sought.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.811/2023
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Nirmala A regarding dismissal for default
The case involves Indian Overseas Bank represented by the Senior Manager against Nirmala A regarding a suit that was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.1239/2024
Case between Usha Kumari et al vs Ajith.G et al regarding injunction
This case involves Usha Kumari and Jithil Kumar as plaintiffs seeking to prevent Ajith.G and S.Nizamudeen from obstructing their access to their properties. The plaintiffs argue that they have been legally using a pathway that the defendants are trying to block.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.210 /2024
Case between Boban K.G vs Radhamma et al regarding dismissal of suit
This case involves Boban K.G as the plaintiff, and Radhamma and Lalu Kumar as defendants. The suit was dismissed as not pressed on the hearing date.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.831/2024
Case between A. Sreenivasan vs Arun.S regarding suit dismissal
A. Sreenivasan, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Arun.S, the defendant. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.1731/2023
Case between Althaf. S.M vs Seneena et al regarding mediation agreement
Althaf. S.M is the plaintiff against Seneena and B. Habeeba Beevi regarding a mediation agreement. The court has decreed the suit in terms of the agreement entered into between the parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No.1801/2023
Case between Union Bank of India vs Sabeen Mohammad Iqbal regarding dismissal of suit
The Union Bank of India represented by its Senior Manager, S.R Rakesh, is the plaintiff in this case, while Sabeen Mohammad Iqbal is the defendant. The court dismissed the suit as it was not pressed by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.877/2015
Case between Umaiba Beevi vs Mubaiba Beevi regarding dismissal of suit for default
Umaiba Beevi is the plaintiff in this case, while Mubaiba Beevi is the defendant. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff failed to appear before the court despite being granted time.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No. 516/2023
Case between M/s Palm World Manufacturing Unit vs The Secretary, Muncipal Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram regarding suit dismissal for default
M/s Palm World Manufacturing Unit represented by Ajith Kumar.K filed a suit against The Secretary, Municipal Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram and The Chairman, Kelpalm Facility Centre. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.679/2011
Case between Sheela Johnson vs Travancore Devaswom Board et al regarding declaration, injunction and allied reliefs.
Sheela Johnson filed a suit against the Travancore Devaswom Board and others for a declaration and injunction concerning a property dispute. The case revolves around conflicting claims over property ownership and the validity of survey records.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No.231/2024
Case between Canara Bank vs Ravin R.S et al regarding suit dismissal
The case involves Canara Bank represented by its manager against Ravin R.S and Rajendran R regarding a suit that was not pressed. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.263/2020
Case between Anitha Sunil Gangadharan et al vs Ammini regarding setting aside a document and for injunction
Anitha Sunil Gangadharan and others are the plaintiffs seeking to set aside a document and obtain an injunction against the defendant, Ammini. The case involves issues of possession and rights over certain property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.01/2024
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sanilkumar.N et al regarding dismissal of suit
The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank represented by its Branch Manager, filed a suit against Sanilkumar.N and Sreerekha.R.I. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed on 28.10.2025.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.1050/2024
Case between Leela et al vs Peerumohammed regarding local investigation and appointment of advocate commissioner
The case involves plaintiffs Leela, Kumari Sheela, and Jayalekshmi seeking a local investigation and appointment of an advocate commissioner. The defendant Peerumohammed has also requested the appointment of a surveyor to identify the properties in question.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No.230/2025
Case between S.Sobhana vs Sreenath et al regarding IA.No.11/2025
The case involves a petition filed by S.Sobhana against Sreenath and others regarding the dismissal of an interim application. The court reviewed arguments and decided not to modify a previous order.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.2425/1988
Case between Sathyabhama et al vs Leela @ Reesa et al regarding acceptance of additional written statement
The case involves the petitioners Sathyabhama and others seeking to accept an additional written statement. The defendants, including Leela @ Reesa, opposed this request, leading the court to review the earlier dismissals and the current petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.1076/2022
Case between Sheeja.V vs Sreedevi regarding plaint rejection.
Sheeja.V filed a suit against Sreedevi. The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to represent and remit court fees.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.194/2025
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
The plaintiffs, Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran and Divakaran Padma Kumar Pillay, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, Deepti Sivan, to restrain her from transferring certain stocks and shares. The court found that the plaintiffs made out a prima facie case warranting the injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.48/2022
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
Sreenath.S is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Thankarajan and Usha. The suit was dismissed as not pressed after the plaintiff's counsel filed a not press memo.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.204/2023
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
The plaintiffs Sindhu.S, Janaki.B.S, and Mohandas.D are involved in a suit against defendants Lalitha and Ashok Kumar.I. The case was dismissed as withdrawn after being heard.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.315/2023
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak filed a suit against Babu Chettiyar and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent them from demolishing her compound wall and causing waste on her property. The plaintiff alleges harassment and obstruction from the defendants, which poses a risk to her safety and property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.375/2023
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves the Union Bank of India as the plaintiff and Midhun. M as the defendant. The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and lack of application.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.394/2019
Case between All India Sports Council for Deaf vs The Deaf Cricket Society et al regarding return of suit
The case involves the All India Sports Council for Deaf as the plaintiff against The Deaf Cricket Society and others as defendants. The court addressed procedural issues regarding the proper jurisdiction for the lawsuit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.423/2024
Case between Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor et al vs Indian Pentecostal Church of God et al regarding civil proceedings
The plaintiffs, including the Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor and its representatives, are involved in a civil case against the Indian Pentecostal Church of God and its councils. The suit addresses matters related to church governance and representation.
Civil Suit
OS.No.470/2021
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd vs Basheer K.H et al regarding recovery of money.
The plaintiff, M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd, filed a suit against the defendants Basheer K.H, Smt. Sameera Basheer, and Babeer T.P for recovery of a loan amount. The case was heard ex-parte as the defendants did not appear before the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.598/2024
Case between Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor et al vs Indian Pentecostal Church of God et al regarding Power of Attorney
The case involves the Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor and various defendants from the Indian Pentecostal Church of God regarding the acceptance of a power of attorney. The plaintiffs challenge the validity of the power of attorney executed by the third defendant.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.718/2020
Case between Beatrice Miranda vs Sheela Tommy et al regarding violation of injunction order
Beatrice Miranda filed a petition alleging that the respondents violated an injunction order preventing them from trespassing on her property. The court addressed the claims related to the pathway and constructed gate leading to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.777/2016
Case between I. Thankanilavu vs S. Kumar regarding Suit for realistion of money.
The plaintiff, I. Thankanilavu, is seeking recovery of ₹5,00,000/- from the defendant, S. Kumar, who did not hand over the shop room as agreed upon. The plaintiff claims the defendant breached their agreement and has not returned the money.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.860 /2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
The case involves Canara Bank, represented by its Senior Manager, against Smt. Sheeja. N regarding the rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fees. The court has rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1043/2017
Case between Antony vs Stansilas et al regarding partition and injunction
The case involves a dispute over a property originally owned by the father of the plaintiff Antony and the defendants. The plaintiff seeks partition and injunction against the defendants attempting to evict him from the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1065/2017
Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions
The plaintiffs, M.V. Shafi and M.V. Shanavas, contend they are entitled to a share of their father's property, claiming that the partitions made by their father, M M. Vahabudeen, are null and void. The defendants argue against this claim and state the suit is not maintainable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1190/2018
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, Indian Overseas Bank, has filed a suit against the defendant, Santhosh Kumar, for the recovery of a loan of ₹1,55,178/- due to non-repayment. The defendant had taken a loan from the plaintiff bank and failed to comply with the repayment terms.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1280/2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, sued the defendants, Jayan. E and Saleela, for the recovery of an outstanding loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan, leading to the suit for realization of the owed sum.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1430/2022
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves Indian Overseas Bank as the plaintiff and Aradhi Restaurant as the defendant, represented by its Proprietress. The court dealt with the rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and lack of applications.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1475/2022
Case between Bindu vs Jayakumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Bindu, is the owner of a building from which she has attempted to evict a tenant due to non-payment of rent. The defendant, Jayakumar, allegedly attempted to trespass into the property, prompting the lawsuit for an injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1940/2013
Case between Suhara Beevi et al vs Subaida et al regarding mandatory injunction and recovery of possession.
The case involves the plaintiffs seeking a mandatory injunction and recovery of possession against the defendants regarding certain shop rooms and a residential building. The additional second plaintiff, who is the son of the first plaintiff, claims the defendants have been occupying the premises without proper rights.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1963/2023
Case between Geo Expert Pvt Ltd. vs Justin.V.S regarding dismissal of suit
Geo Expert Pvt Ltd. initiated a suit against Justin.V.S. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff despite notice.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1664/2024
Case between Mithun John Mathew vs Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala regarding mediation agreement.
Mithun John Mathew is the plaintiff against Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala. The suit was finally heard on January 31, 2025, and the court delivered its judgment on the same day.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.184/2025
Case between Asok Kumar et al vs Vinaya Chandran et al regarding injunction
The petitioners, Asok Kumar and Shaji, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendants, Vinaya Chandran, Vinisha Chandran, and Sreejith, to prevent further construction on certain properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.366/2020
Case between Thribhuvana Vikraman @ Thribhu vs Sudha regarding suit dismissal for default
The plaintiff, Thribhuvana Vikraman @ Thribhu, was absent during the hearing, and there was no representation. As a result, the case was dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.1888/2022
Case between Harikumar.S.P vs Lalitha.O et al regarding plaint rejection
Harikumar.S.P is the plaintiff, while Lalitha.O and Manu.M.L are the defendants. The case involves the rejection of the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and non-remittance of court fees.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1978/2022
Case between Aji vs Rajasekharan Nair regarding injunction and other consequential reliefs.
Aji filed a suit against Rajasekharan Nair seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction regarding a property sale agreement. The defendant failed to execute the sale deed as agreed, leading to the plaintiff's legal action.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won