Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.263/2020

Case between Anitha Sunil Gangadharan et al vs Ammini regarding setting aside a document and for injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S.
Order Date
2025-10-30
Duration
approximately-2 years 27 days
Case Code No.
263
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Anitha Sunil Gangadharan and others are the plaintiffs seeking to set aside a document and obtain an injunction against the defendant, Ammini. The case involves issues of possession and rights over certain property.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the application for appointing a commissioner, stating that it was filed after the closure of evidence and lacked merit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the application for appointing a commissioner, stating that it was filed after the closure of evidence and lacked merit.
Key Reasoning:
The application was belated and did not provide sufficient justification for reopening evidence, thus it could not be entertained.
Why Defendant Won:
The application was belated and did not provide sufficient justification for reopening evidence, thus it could not be entertained.
Supporting Evidence
The present application for the appointment of a commission has been filed belatedly in a suit where the evidence on both sides has already been completed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: The application is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anitha Sunil Gangadharan
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vishnu Sunil Gangadharan
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sindhu.S Gangadharan
Party Age
31
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ammini
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Punchakkari G.Raveendran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Kulathoor S.V. Premakumaran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Shibukumar vs Krishnan Nair regarding plaint rejection
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Abhilash A S vs Vishnu P Rajasekharan regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Vivian Jolly et al vs N Pushpakumaran Nair regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between A.Padmanabhan vs A.Rajendran Nair regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between W. Selvaraj vs Sam Raj et al regarding rejection of plaint
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won