Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.230/2025

Case between S.Sobhana vs Sreenath et al regarding IA.No.11/2025

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S.
Order Date
2025-10-18
Duration
Case Code No.
230
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition filed by S.Sobhana against Sreenath and others regarding the dismissal of an interim application. The court reviewed arguments and decided not to modify a previous order.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition filed by S.Sobhana, upholding the previous order regarding the appointment of an advocate commissioner.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition filed by S.Sobhana, upholding the previous order regarding the appointment of an advocate commissioner.
Key Reasoning:
The court found no grounds to modify the previous order regarding the advocate commissioner's appointment.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found no grounds to modify the previous order regarding the advocate commissioner's appointment.
Supporting Evidence
The said order suffers no infirmity and there is no palpable error in the same.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence this application is dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
S.Sobhana
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreenath
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Madhusoodhanan
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Karthika.M.L.
Party Age
33
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kavitha.M.L.
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Anoop Rajendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.B.Vasudevan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Application to modify the order in IA 6/2025.
Evidence:
Hence this court has appointed a counsel who has more standing at the bar. The said order suffers no infirmity and there is no palpable error in the same. Hence, this court is of the view that there is no need to modify the order in IA 6/2025.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Shibukumar vs Krishnan Nair regarding plaint rejection
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Abhilash A S vs Vishnu P Rajasekharan regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Vivian Jolly et al vs N Pushpakumaran Nair regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between A.Padmanabhan vs A.Rajendran Nair regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between W. Selvaraj vs Sam Raj et al regarding rejection of plaint
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won