Similar Cases
Based on: OS.695/2021 — Case between Sarojini.K.P et al vs Vikraman et al regarding partition of property.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS.No.1085/2010
Case between Mini vs Jalaja kumari et al regarding Final Decree Application.
Mini is the petitioner seeking relief through a Final Decree Application, while Jalaja kumari and others are the defendants. The case was heard but the petitioner failed to appear, leading to the dismissal of the application.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
FDA 1351/2022
Case between Sunu S. vs Sumathi et al regarding partition of property
Sunu S. filed a petition for a final decree of partition of property following a preliminary decree. The defendants, Sumathi and others, did not appear in court.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
FDA.No. 1711/2022
Case between Xavier @ Suresh vs Valsan @ Banedict regarding partition of property
Xavier @ Suresh and Valsan @ Banedict are brothers involved in a legal dispute regarding the partition of their shared property. The court has passed a final decree regarding the division of the property into two equal shares.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
OS.1397/2025
Case between Bernadine Narcisus Silva @ B.N. Silva vs Rajendra Rao regarding Sale Deed dispute
The plaintiff, Bernadine Narcisus Silva, seeks to nullify a Sale Deed claimed to be obtained fraudulently by the defendant, Rajendra Rao. The plaintiff alleges that despite agreeing to sell his property, the defendant deceived him, resulting in a void sale.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 802/2011
Case between Malini vs Maya Krishnakumar et al regarding partition of property
Malini, the second plaintiff, seeks partition of property following the death of her mother, the first plaintiff. The case revolves around the validity of a Will executed by the first plaintiff in favor of the second plaintiff.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 61/2014
Case between Babu et al vs Abraham et al regarding partition of property
The case involves a partition of property among multiple plaintiffs and a defendant. The plaintiffs are challenging the defendant's claim over the shared property.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
OS 160/2013
Case between Lissy vs Lilly et al regarding final decree application
Lissy, the plaintiff, filed a final decree application in an earlier civil suit for partition of property. The court has heard the petition and is finalizing the partition based on a commission report.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
OS 291/2015
Case between Swarnavalli et al vs Vishwaguptan et al regarding final decree application
The plaintiffs, Swarnavalli and others, filed an application for a final decree regarding the partition of property as per earlier orders. The court decided on the allotment of shares among the parties based on a commission report and survey plan.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
OS 303/2020
Case between Soorya et al vs Sooraj regarding metes and bounds partition of property
This case involves a petition for passing a final decree regarding the partition of property among the plaintiffs and defendant. The plaintiffs are seeking to effectuate a division of the property as per a commission report.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
OS 491/2016
Case between Suresh Kumar vs Sunilkumar K.K. et al regarding property partition
This case involves Suresh Kumar as the plaintiff and Sunilkumar K.K., Sujitha Bhai, and Sunitha as the defendants. They are involved in a property partition dispute regarding the allocation of shares in certain lands.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 307/2023
Case between Mini et al vs Robin regarding dismissal of petition
The case involves plaintiffs Mini, Renjini, and Jayini against defendant Robin regarding a petition that was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioners. The court noted repeated opportunities were provided to the petitioner to take necessary steps.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
O. S. No. 248/2000
Case between Sathi vs Shalini Manilal regarding Final Decree Application
The petitioner, Sathi, and the respondent, Shalini Manilal, have settled their disputes through mediation. The court accepted the mediation agreement and passed a final decree according to its terms.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 448/2017
Case between Vysakh. S. Kumar vs Sandhya et al regarding Final Decree Application
The case involves Vysakh. S. Kumar as the petitioner against Sandhya and others regarding a final decree application. The court dismissed the application for default due to the petitioner's absence.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
Final Decree Appln. 7/2023 in O.S. No. 131/2019
Case between Athira Ajayan et al vs Sasidharan Pillai et al regarding petition for final decree
Athira Ajayan and others are petitioners in a final decree application against Sasidharan Pillai and others. The petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's absence and lack of representation.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 341/2018
Case between Sudarsanan Pillai vs Sudharmini et al regarding Final Decree Application
Sudarsanan Pillai filed a final decree application against Sudharmini and others. The court dismissed the application for default due to failure to file the necessary commission application.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 409/2021
Case between Harikumar et al vs Sreekumar regarding metes and bounds partition
The plaintiffs, Harikumar, Sreekumari, and Bindhu, seek a final decree for partitioning property after a preliminary decree awarded them 3/4 share. The defendant, Sreekumar, remained absent and was set exparte during the proceedings.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.305/2010
Case between Philomina Rajan et al vs Joy Bai et al regarding passing of final decree
The petitioners, Philomina Rajan and Rajan, are seeking a final decree in a partition case. The respondents include Joy Bai and others, and the case involves allotting shares of property as per the commission report.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
O.S 223/2019
Case between Sindhu vs Binu regarding Final Decree Application
Sindhu is the petitioner and Binu is the respondent. The Final Decree application was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
OS. No.338/2018
Case between Biji.R vs Sheeja regarding specific performance
Biji.R filed a suit against Sheeja for specific performance of a contract regarding the sale of a property. The plaintiff claims that the defendant failed to execute the sale deed despite receiving an advance sale consideration.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.504/2015
Case between Ramesan vs Sujatha et al regarding partition of ancestral property.
The plaintiff Ramesan seeks a partition of the ancestral property claimed jointly with the defendants, who are siblings. The case arises from disputes over the joint possession and ownership of property following the death of their mother.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1295/2023
Case between Aravindan Nair et al vs Ramachandran Nair et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, who are siblings, sought a partition of property from the defendants, also siblings, after the death of their sister. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants were obstructing their rights to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.377/2017
Case between Nazarudeen. A vs Tom.D et al regarding suit for declaration, recovery of possession, and injunction
The plaintiffs, Nazarudeen. A and Laila Beegum, are husband and wife seeking legal remedies for property encroachment. The defendants, Tom.D and Johnson, are accused of unlawfully taking possession of a portion of the plaintiffs' property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.772/2021
Case between Sarathchandran Nair.J vs Government of India et al regarding boundary measurement and injunction
The petitioner Sarathchandran Nair is seeking to measure and demarcate certain properties against the defendants, which include the Government of India and the Indian Coast Guard. The defendants dispute the plaintiff's claims over the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.637/2015
Case between R. Saroja vs Sivathanu @ Murugan et al regarding partition of plaint schedule properties.
R. Saroja filed a suit for partition of properties originally belonging to her deceased mother and grandmother against Sivathanu @ Murugan and others. The plaintiff claims her share was not properly recognized in prior partition arrangements.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.994/2022
Case between Thulaseedharan.B. vs Bindu et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
The petitioner, Thulaseedharan.B., filed a petition for a temporary prohibitory injunction against defendants Bindu and Geetha regarding an alleged trespass on his property. The case revolves around property ownership disputes and the right to construct on adjacent lands.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1510/2021
Case between Sanish Sivanandan et al vs Sivaji Sapphire Apartment Owners Association et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Sanish Sivanandan and his wife Renjini R Nair are the plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Sivaji Sapphire Apartment Owners Association and its representatives. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants have obstructed their renovation work and have issued defamatory statements against them.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.134/2014
Case between Sathya Bhama et al vs Surendran et al regarding setting aside a sale deed
The plaintiff, Sathya Bhama, claims that the first defendant fraudulently obtained her property while she was suffering from a mental condition. The case seeks to set aside the sale deed executed in favor of Surendran, the first defendant.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1407/2015
Case between Susheela Devi. B. et al vs Anil Kumar et al regarding putting up of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, including the deceased Susheela Devi, are seeking to establish property boundaries and prevent the defendants from encroaching on their land. The defendants have previously trespassed and caused damage to the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.138 /2019
Case between Syed Mohammed Sadik vs Suresh Babu. R.C regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.
Syed Mohammed Sadik and Suresh Babu. R.C are involved in two interconnected suits regarding property disputes over a pathway. The plaintiff claims that the defendant illegally encroached upon the pathway, reducing its width.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.549/2017
Case between Dr. Aggy. S. Valentine vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory injunction and other reliefs
The plaintiff, Dr. Aggy. S. Valentine, alleges that the defendants unlawfully demolished her compound wall and trespassed on her property. The case revolves around her request for a mandatory injunction to restore her property and prevent further unauthorized actions by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1687/2013
Case between Valsala vs Sasidharan Nadar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Valsala, claims ownership and access rights to a pathway leading to her property, which the defendants, Sasidharan Nadar and his daughter Soumya, are obstructing. The defendants dispute these claims and argue that the plaintiff has no right over the pathway.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1785/2018
Case between Ajithkhan et al vs Directorate of Factories & Boilers et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Ajithkhan, Anupkhan, and Ayubkhan, are children of Smt. Khadeejabeevi and Sri. Safarulla, seeking to prevent the defendants, including the Directorate of Factories & Boilers, from obstructing their right to use a pathway. The dispute revolves around the use of a pathway claimed by both parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.427/2021
Case between Rajesh Balakrishnan vs Sunitha Sundar et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Rajesh Balakrishnan, the plaintiff, seeks partition of property and injunction against his sister, her husband, and his mother. The dispute revolves around property inherited from their father.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.396/2013
Case between Bindhu.T vs Prasad regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Bindhu.T, seeks a decree for the fixation of boundaries and a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Prasad, who is encroaching on her property. The defendant contends that there has been no encroachment and seeks dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.783/2020
Case between Gladstone.D et al vs Lilibai et al regarding partition and injunction.
The plaintiffs, descendants of Sri. Daveed, sought partition of a property after his death. The defendants, descendants of another legal heir, challenged the plaintiffs' claims, leading to a legal dispute over property ownership and injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.1196/2012
Case between Aloysius E.Gomez et al vs Maglin Lobo regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Aloysius E. Gomez and his wife Mary Lobo filed a suit against Maglin Lobo regarding obstruction in a public pathway. The plaintiffs sought a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendant from constructing a roof over a portion of the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1940/2000
Case between Bhuvanendran vs Soman Nadar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Bhuvanendran, the plaintiff, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Soman Nadar and his legal heirs regarding the maintenance of lateral support to his property and the removal of bamboo plants causing damage to his property. The defendants have disputed the claims.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1214/2014
Case between Madathuvilakam Ilangam Temple et al vs Rajan et al regarding settlement scheme and injunction
The plaintiffs, including the Madathuvilakam Ilangam Temple, are seeking a settlement scheme and permanent injunction against the defendants who are mismanaging the temple. The case involves disputes over the administration and enjoyment of property associated with the family temple.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1407.2021
Case between Chandrika et al vs Sindhu.S et al regarding declaration of title and recovery of possession
The plaintiffs, legal heirs of the late K. Soman, seek a declaration of title and recovery of possession of a property. The defendants allegedly took forcible possession of the property after the death of K. Soman, ignoring the rights of the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.48/2025
Case between Govind.D.C vs Adhul et al regarding trespassing and injunction
Govind.D.C, the plaintiff, is seeking an injunction against Adhul, Salim, and the BCG Horizon Association to prevent them from trespassing into his property. The defendants claim the right to the common areas as a registered association.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1277/2016
Case between Dr. S.Krishnan et al vs Smt. Ammini regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, Dr. S.Krishnan and Arya Sreedharan, are seeking relief against the defendant, Smt. Ammini, for unauthorized construction on a boundary wall separating their properties. The court found that the defendant's construction lacked necessary permits and constituted trespass.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.475/2021
Case between Vinod S Nair vs Sini Shafeekh et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Vinod S Nair, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Sini Shafeekh and others regarding the possession of a vehicle and allegations of fraud. The plaintiff claimed that he is entitled to possess a vehicle due to an agreement with the defendants, while the defendants denied any such agreement and raised various counterclaims.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.509/2016
Case between K. Somasekhara Pillai vs Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, K. Somasekhara Pillai, is involved in a dispute over property rights with the defendants, including the Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram. He claims they unlawfully entered his property and cut down coconut trees, leading to a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1561/2019
Case between M.S Sheela, M.S Beena, M.S Kumari Sheeja vs Girija Santhosh, S.G.Sagish regarding partition of property.
The plaintiffs, daughters of the deceased T.S.Muthuswami Achari, seek a partition of property against the defendants, who are the wife and son of their deceased brother M.S.Santhoshkumar. The case involves claims of equal rights over the property governed by the Hindu Succession Act.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1063/2018
Case between Seena vs Thankamma regarding declaration and for injunction.
The plaintiff Seena, aged 44, is seeking a declaration of her easement rights over a pathway obstructed by the defendant Thankamma, aged 54. The case involves claims of ownership and obstruction regarding a schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.420/2015
Case between Nirmala vs Chellappan et al regarding declaration and injunction of property rights
Nirmala has filed a suit against Chellappan and others for a declaration of her property title and to prevent them from trespassing. The defendants claim that the plaintiff is trying to encroach on a pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.507/2014
Case between T.Sarojam et al vs Santhamma et al regarding fixation and putting up of boundary and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, T.Sarojam and others, filed a suit against the defendants, Santhamma and others, seeking to fix boundaries and prevent the defendants from trespassing on their property. The plaintiffs' predecessor had ownership of the property, but the defendants attempted to create rights over it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1236/2020
Case between Divya Kumar.P vs Peethambaran et al regarding recovery of possession and mesne profits.
Divya Kumar.P is seeking recovery of possession of her property from her parents and sister, who are currently residing there. The plaintiff contends that the defendants are in illegal possession and has filed this suit after her attempts to evict them were unsuccessful.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won