Similar Cases
Based on: ORIGINAL SUIT No. 779/2023 — Case between Sreedharan et al vs Rajesh et al regarding partition of property.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 662/2017
Case between Girish .M vs Sreenivasan.M et al regarding partition of property
Girish .M is the plaintiff seeking partition of property against Sreenivasan.M and several others who are the defendants. The case revolves around the division of property originally owned by their deceased father, M. Raghavan.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 774/2015
Case between Padmini vs Yasodha P regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
This case involves plaintiffs Padmini and Nidheesh seeking a perpetual prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from evicting them from their property. The plaintiffs allege that they are the lawful occupants of the property and have faced threats of eviction from the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.175/2018
Case between Lakshmikutty Amma et al vs Kozhikode City Service Co-operative Bank et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, a husband and wife, are seeking a declaration regarding their life interest in a property previously settled to their son, the second defendant. They claim that a loan taken by the second defendant against the property was unauthorized as their consent was not obtained.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 914/2019
Case between Sadasivan et al vs Valiyedath Subhadra et al regarding partition
The plaintiffs, Sadasivan and others, are seeking a partition of a property which they claim is co-owned with the defendants, Valiyedath Subhadra and others. The case revolves around the rights over a property originally belonging to their ancestor, Kunjipennu.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.317/2023
Case between P.A.Sajeed vs Muhammed Shihab regarding mandatory injunction and damages
The case involves P.A.Sajeed as the plaintiff and Muhammed Shihab as the defendant. The plaintiff is seeking a mandatory injunction for the defendant to vacate the premises and damages for unauthorized occupation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.875/2018
Case between K.Thankamani vs Valappil Nadeera regarding recovery of possession
K. Thankamani filed a suit against Valappil Nadeera for recovery of possession of property based on a title established by an earlier court judgment which declared a cancellation deed void. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant has no rights to the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 01/2017
Case between Ramanattukara Scheduled caste Service Co-operative Society vs Assistant Engineer, N.H. Bypass Division et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction and compensation
The plaintiff, Ramanattukara Scheduled Caste Service Co-operative Society, seeks a perpetual prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who are involved in the construction of a flyover. The suit aims to prevent the defendants from trespassing on the plaintiff's property and causing interference.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 55/2024
Case between Vanaja Shanmughan vs Neelakandan et al regarding partition
The plaintiff, Vanaja Shanmughan, is seeking a partition of property that was previously owned by her mother and siblings. The defendants, who are related to the plaintiff, did not appear in court and were declared exparte.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 132/2022
Case between Ahammed koya S.V. vs Bichu et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession.
The plaintiff, Ahammed koya S.V., seeks declaration and recovery of possession of property claimed to be his late mother's. The defendants, Bichu and others, contest this claim, asserting rights over the property based on a gift from the plaintiff's mother.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 328/2015
Case between Ayisha vs Vellathumparambil,V.P.Balakrishnan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction, mandatory injunction and recovery of possession.
Ayisha, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Vellathumparambil,V.P.Balakrishnan and others seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction and recovery of possession of property. The suit arose from disputes over alleged trespass and construction by the defendants on the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 572 /2012
Case between E.S. Santhadevi et al vs Sarada et al regarding recovery of possession and declaration of property rights
E.S. Santhadevi and E.S. Maheshkumar, the plaintiffs, are seeking recovery of possession of property from the defendants, who include Sarada and others. The case revolves around property rights and alleged trespass by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 216/2019
Case between Latha.K.V vs Thankam.K.V et al regarding partition of property
The plaintiff, Latha.K.V, is seeking partition of a property after the death of her father, Balan, which she claims is jointly owned by herself and the defendants. The defendants, including Thankam.K.V, dispute the legitimacy of the plaintiff's claims and assert that there is no property available for partition due to prior settlements.
Civil Suit
Partial
Original Suit No. 261/1999
Case between T.N. Devaki vs Padmanabhan Nair et al regarding setting aside the partition deed
The plaintiff, T.N. Devaki, seeks to set aside the partition deed claiming fraud and undue influence exerted by the defendants, who are her relatives. The case revolves around the legitimacy of the shares allotted to her in a disputed property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 182/2005
Case between Rajagopalan Nair et al vs Kamalam et al regarding injunction
The plaintiffs, Rajagopalan Nair (deceased) and five others, filed a suit for injunction against Kamalam and others, claiming that the defendants attempted to trespass upon their property. The case revolves around property ownership and boundary disputes.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 377/2019
Case between M.K.Shailaja vs A.K. Vanaja et al regarding declaration and cancellation of document No. 3539/2012
The case involves M.K.Shailaja seeking a declaration that document No. 3539/2012 was executed by fraud and misrepresentation against her. The plaintiff seeks to cancel this document based on claims of lack of consent and consideration.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit Nos: 499/2017
Case between Erattil Chinna Mani vs Erattil Anil Kumar et al regarding partition of property
Erattil Chinna Mani filed a suit against Erattil Anil Kumar and others for partition of the property originally belonging to their father, Erattil Velayudhan. The case involves disputes regarding the division of the property among the heirs after Velayudhan's death.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.626/2023
Case between Padmavathi, V.K vs Sakunthala.V.K et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves Padmavathi, who is seeking a declaration that a certain property belongs to her and a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The defendants are accused of trying to make forged claims on the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.242/2024
Case between Sivadasan et al vs Shibu Adukkkathu regarding partition
The plaintiffs are Sivadasan, Sathyan, Pradeepan, Radha, Geetha, and Sheeba, who are seeking a partition of the property originally owned by Peravakutty. The defendant is Shibu Adukkkathu, who is residing on a portion of the property and is entitled to a share.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 334/2021
Case between Mohanan. P.V et al vs Gireesh. P. V. et al regarding partition
The plaintiffs, Mohanan. P.V, Sudheer. P.V, and Dharmmarajan, are seeking a partition of property against the defendants, Gireesh. P. V. and Jayarajan. P. V., who are also family members. The case revolves around the division of inherited property and the presumption of death for missing heirs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 367/2024
Case between N. Rathnavally vs M.P. Binoos regarding mandatory injunction and realization of money.
The plaintiff, N. Rathnavally, is suing the defendant, M.P. Binoos, for a mandatory injunction and to recover overdue license fees. The defendant has occupied the plaint schedule shed without payment after the license agreement expired.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 70/2024
Case between Babu. P vs Vinod Kumar. P et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Babu. P filed a suit against Vinod Kumar. P and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction regarding temple rituals and construction activities. The plaintiff claims that the defendants are obstructing his rights as the managing trustee of the temple trust.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 588/2015
Case between Narangali Baburaj et al vs N. Sasidharan et al regarding partition
The plaintiffs, Narangali Baburaj, Narangali Hariharan, Girija, Geetha, and Sudha, are seeking a partition of property against the defendant N. Sasidharan. The case involves the division of inherited property among the family members.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.659/2023
Case between Abdul Latheef. E. P vs K. Sivaraj et al regarding declaration and injunction
The case involves Abdul Latheef. E. P as the plaintiff and K. Sivaraj and K. Praveenraj as defendants. The plaintiff is seeking a declaration that a partnership with the defendants has been dissolved and is also requesting for an injunction against them.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.744/2023
Case between Anil. E. P vs Samastha Kerala Jam-Iyyathul Muallimeen Central Council regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Anil. E. P is the plaintiff, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Samastha Kerala Jam-Iyyathul Muallimeen Central Council, the defendant. The plaintiff claims to be in possession of a property he leased and accuses the defendant of attempting to evict him unlawfully.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.208/2025
Case between Mohanan P.D vs The Manager, State Bank of India regarding declaration of valid title deed
The plaintiff, Mohanan P.D, filed a suit for declaration regarding the validity of a title deed after the original was reported destroyed. The defendant, State Bank of India, admitted the plaint claim in their written statement.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit Nos. 353/2024
Case between Shibu vs R. Rajagopalakrishnan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Shibu is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against R. Rajagopalakrishnan and others. The case arises from a dispute over property ownership and related claims.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 126/2026
Case between Surendran vs Sathyapalan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Surendran has filed a suit against Sathyapalan seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction related to his property. The case highlights a dispute over access to property and boundary issues.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.227/2024
Case between Karunakaran.P.V vs Chandran.K regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Karunakaran.P.V is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Chandran.K. The case involves a dispute over the right of lateral support for the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 160/2025
Case between Baiju. M vs Siyam regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiff, Baiju. M, claims that the defendant, Siyam, has failed to pay the remaining amount for a bus agreement and is in possession of the bus. The plaintiff seeks an order to compel the defendant to pay the due amount or return the bus.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 345/2022
Case between Dasan. T et al vs Lokeshan regarding partition of property
The plaintiffs, children of Deceased Imberan, seek a partition of the property inherited from their father. The defendant, Lokeshan, claims exclusive ownership, leading to a dispute over co-ownership rights.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 526/2025
Case between Usman. E vs N. K. Abdurahiman et al regarding declaration of document as null and void
Usman. E filed a suit against N. K. Abdurahiman and others for declaring a document as null and void and for its cancellation. The plaintiff claims that the defendants transferred property without proper consent, causing potential harm to the Priyadarshini Study Centre.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.756/2019
Case between V.N.Jayesh vs Venugopalan et al regarding partition of property
The case involves a partition suit filed by V.N.Jayesh against his siblings regarding the property inherited from their father Velukutty. The plaintiff seeks to partition the property after claiming financial assistance provided to the father during his lifetime.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.462/2021
Case between Kadeeja vs Kunnamagalam Grama Panchayath regarding mandatory injunction
Kadeeja is the plaintiff claiming ownership over a property that the Kunnamagalam Grama Panchayath has converted into a public road. The plaintiff seeks an injunction to remove the construction on her property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 567/2019
Case between Pathumma et al vs Beeran Kutti et al regarding partition of property
The plaintiffs, Pathumma and others, filed a suit for partition of property against the defendants, Beeran Kutti and others. The case arose from a dispute over joint ownership and possession of certain properties after their respective parents' death.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.531/2015
Case between P.Premi et al vs M.Rijeesh et al regarding recovery of possession and consequential injunction.
The plaintiffs, P.Premi and Sunila, seek recovery of possession and a mandatory injunction against the defendants, M.Rijeesh and others, who have allegedly encroached upon their property. The court found that the defendants had constructed structures on the plaintiffs' land without permission.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.08/2022
Case between Bineesh vs Thekkedath Sreenivasan Nair et al regarding declaration of right and injunction.
The plaintiff, Bineesh, filed a suit against Thekkedath Sreenivasan Nair and others regarding access to a pathway serving his property. The defendants were absent during the hearing and raised claims over the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.358/2017
Case between Koroth Sandhya vs Dr.K.P.Ravi et al regarding easement rights over plaint B schedule road.
The plaintiffs, Koroth Sandhya and others, are involved in a dispute against Dr.K.P.Ravi and Dr.Shamil.P.R regarding easement rights over a road serving their property. The plaintiffs claim the right to use this road, which the defendants attempted to obstruct.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.35/2021
Case between Malayil Balan vs Nikhil regarding injunction restraining trespass
Malayil Balan filed a suit to restrain Nikhil from trespassing onto the scheduled property belonging to Balan's son-in-law. Nikhil counterclaimed for a mandatory injunction to restore a pathway he claimed was unjustly blocked by Balan.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 229 / 2020
Case between Narmadha et al vs Marakkath Lal regarding permanent injunction
The plaintiffs, Narmadha and others, claim ownership and possession of a property originally held under a partition deed. They seek an injunction against the defendant, Marakkath Lal, who is the legal heir of the previous owner, to prevent trespassing into the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.573/2017
Case between Sreenivasan et al vs Thondiyil Kallyani et al regarding recovery of possession of property
The case involves Sreenivasan and his legal heirs against Thondiyil Kallyani and others, concerning the recovery of possession of a disputed property. The plaintiffs claim ownership based on title deeds while the defendants allege adverse possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 585/2018
Case between V.M. Abdulkhader Muhammed vs Calicut North Service Co-Operative Bank regarding mandatory and prohibitory injunction.
V.M. Abdulkhader Muhammed is the plaintiff claiming ownership of a property and disputing a loan liability claimed by Calicut North Service Co-Operative Bank. The plaintiff asserts he never availed any loan from the bank, while the bank claims he is liable for loans taken by a friend using the property as collateral.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.139/2018
Case between Chereekandy Gopinath vs Chereekandy Vijayan et al regarding fixation of boundaries and injunction.
This case involves Chereekandy Gopinath as the plaintiff and Chereekandy Vijayan and Vipin as defendants. The plaintiff seeks to fix the boundaries of disputed properties due to alleged encroachments by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 95/2017
Case between Satheesh Charly vs The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Satheesh Charly, seeks a declaration regarding his membership status in The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club after being expelled. The defendants argue that he was suspended and subsequently expelled for repeated misconduct.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.143/2015
Case between C.Lakshmi et al vs E.P.Velayudhan et al regarding partition and consequential injunction
The plaintiffs, C.Lakshmi and others, are seeking partition of property originally owned by late Ichutty @ Imbichutty. The defendants are E.P.Velayudhan and others, who are claiming ancestral rights over the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 575/2018
Case between Neena Anil Kumar vs Mallika @ Baby et al regarding partition and separate possession
Neena Anil Kumar filed a suit for partition and separate possession of 6/48 share of the plaint schedule property against Mallika @ Baby and others. The case involves disputes over property rights and shares among family members.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.253/2020
Case between Sarika vs Sarala et al regarding partition
The plaintiff, Sarika, is seeking partition of properties originally belonging to Malakkal Balan and his sister Janaki. The defendants include Sarala and her sons, who deny the plaintiff's claim for partition.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 91 / 2021
Case between Saifudheen Ibrahim et al vs K.S.Madhusoodanan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs seek a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent them from creating any charge or alienating property allotted to the plaintiffs per a final decree. The case involves disputes arising from a partition suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 228/2018
Case between Sheeba Kottiyedath vs K.Vipin Kumar et al regarding fixation of boundary
Sheeba Kottiyedath filed a suit against K.Vipin Kumar and Divya.K.K. to fix the boundaries between her property and that of the defendants. The defendants argued that the suit was barred by res judicata due to a previous decree in a related case.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won