Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No.659/2023

Case between Abdul Latheef. E. P vs K. Sivaraj et al regarding declaration and injunction

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Anjali. P
Order Date
2025-07-23
Duration
approximately-2 years 5 months
Case Closed
Wed, 07/23/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Abdul Latheef. E. P as the plaintiff and K. Sivaraj and K. Praveenraj as defendants. The plaintiff is seeking a declaration that a partnership with the defendants has been dissolved and is also requesting for an injunction against them.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court declared that the partnership deed executed on 20.02.2003 has been terminated and issued an injunction against the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Injunction and costs of the proceedings to the plaintiff
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court declared that the partnership deed executed on 20.02.2003 has been terminated and issued an injunction against the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The partnership deed was proven to be terminated and the defendants were unresponsive.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The partnership deed was proven to be terminated and the defendants were unresponsive.
Supporting Evidence
The case of the plaintiff is proved by the unchallenged oral testimony of the PW1 and the documents produced. The suit is liable to be decreed and I do so.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, it is hereby declared that the partnership deed entered into 20.02.2003 has been terminated. The defendants, their men and agents are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property. The defendants shall pay costs of the proceedings to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Latheef. E. P
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. Sivaraj
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. Praveenraj
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Lawyer notice dated 26.08.2023, Lawyer notice dated 18.09.2023, Notice to Kozhikode Municipal Corporation dated 16.02.2023, Partnership agreement executed between plaintiff and one Vijayaraghavan dated 20.09.2023.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K. S. Vivek
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Sardar Hashmi. M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C. T. Sivanandan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration that the partnership deed entered into on 20.02.2003 has been terminated.
Evidence:
the partnership deed entered into 20.02.2003 has been terminated.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants, their men and agents are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
the defendants, their men and agents are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants shall pay costs of the proceedings to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendants shall pay costs of the proceedings to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice dated 26.08.2023 informing the second defendant of the revocation of the power of attorney.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Lawyer notice dated 18.09.2023 informing the defendants that the partnership has been dissolved.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Returned notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned notice indicating non-receipt by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tracking Consignment Details
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of tracking consignment details dated 19.09.2023.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Partnership Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement dated 20.09.2023 executed between the plaintiff and Vijayaraghavan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice to Kozhikode Municipal Corporation dated 16.02.2023.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Cash Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cash receipt issued from Kozhikode Municipal Corporation dated 20.09.2023.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Cash Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cash receipt issued from Kozhikode Municipal Corporation dated 02.09.2023.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Partnership Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of the partnership agreement executed between plaintiff and defendants dated 20.02.2003.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Abdul Latheef. E. P vs K. Sivaraj et al regarding declaration and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Latheef. E. P vs K. Sivaraj et al regarding declaration and injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Mon, 02/20/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/23/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Corporation

Similar Cases

Case between Karunakaran.P.V vs Chandran.K regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Girish .M vs Sreenivasan.M et al regarding partition of property
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mohammed Jaseel et al vs The Kozhikode Corporation regarding document production.
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Antony Augustine vs Corporation of Calicut regarding injunction
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Manoj Kumar.T.M. vs Corporation of Kochi, The Secretary, Corporation of Kochi, Antony.A.V. regarding fixation of boundary, recovery of possession and injunction both mandatory and prohibitory.
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won