Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 222/2025

Case between Mohammed Jaseel et al vs The Kozhikode Corporation regarding document production.

Court
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-12-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves multiple plaintiffs including Mohammed Jaseel, Subair M., and others, against The Kozhikode Corporation regarding the production of documents related to the issues in the suit. The court has allowed the application for document production.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has allowed the application for document production.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has allowed the application for document production.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence IA allowed. Documents received.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mohammed Jaseel
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Subair M.
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Asker
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sivanandan
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vijayan
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mohammed Kaloth
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Jaleel T.P.
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sudheer Kumar P.
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Habeeb Rahman K.P.
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gopidasan M.
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Kozhikode Corporation
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.T. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bhavitha V.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Rajagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
IA allowed.
Evidence:
Hence IA allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Documents
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Documents produced are related to the matter in issues involved in this suit.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mohammed Jaseel et al vs The Kozhikode Corporation regarding document production.
Case Code Year
Case between Mohammed Jaseel et al vs The Kozhikode Corporation regarding document production.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Corporation

Similar Cases

Case between Antony Augustine vs Corporation of Calicut regarding injunction
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rose Mary Stancy vs Corporation of Kochi et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Padmanabhan vs George Pudumana et al regarding civil suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between George Pudumana et al vs Padmanabhan regarding declaration and injunction
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Prasanna Prathapan vs The Corporation of Cochin et al regarding dismissal for default.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won