Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 779/2023

Case between Sreedharan et al vs Rajesh et al regarding partition of property.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.MEERA JOHN.K
Order Date
2025-01-23
Duration
approximately-1 year 6 months
Case Closed
Thu, 01/23/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, led by Sreedharan, seek a partition of property originally owned by Unnikandan and subsequently inherited. The defendants, Rajesh, Kalyani, and Rajeev, have not participated in the proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
A preliminary decree is granted for partitioning the property, with plaintiffs entitled to 116/150 shares. Defendants are entitled to 34/150 shares, with the shares to be allocated upon payment of court fees.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary decree for partition of property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
A preliminary decree is granted for partitioning the property, with plaintiffs entitled to 116/150 shares. Defendants are entitled to 34/150 shares, with the shares to be allocated upon payment of court fees.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiffs proved their entitlement to the shares based on historical ownership and inheritance.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiffs proved their entitlement to the shares based on historical ownership and inheritance.
Supporting Evidence
I find that the plaintiffs have proved their case and is entitled to a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, a preliminary decree is passed as follows: 1)Plaint B schedule item No.1 and 2 property shall be divided into 150 equal shares and the plaintiffs are entitled to get 116/150 shares jointly.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sreedharan
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sumathi
Party Age
63
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajan
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bhaskaran
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajitha
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rameshan
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rejani.P.
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shaju
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajesh
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajeev
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kalyani
Party Age
90
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of partition deed No.1485/1904 of SRO, Chevayur; Certified copy of partition deed No.287/1975 of SRO, Chevayur; Certified copy of Kanam deed No.1446/1963 of SRO, Chathamangalam; Purchase certificate issued from Land Tribunal, Kozhikode; Death certificate of Ummannu; Land Tax Receipt issued from Peruvayal Village Officer.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.P.K.Sreekumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiffs are entitled to 116/150 shares in the jointly owned properties.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs have proved their case and is entitled to a decree as prayed for.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are entitled to 34/150 shares in the jointly owned properties.
Evidence:
The defendants are entitled to get 34/150 shares jointly in plaint B schedule item No.1 and 2 property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced to substantiate the history of ownership and detailing the partition of property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified Copy of Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced to demonstrate the partition among legal heirs.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Certified copy of Kanam deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Presented to clarify the ownership transfer and rights over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Purchase Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided to show the legitimacy of ownership claimed by the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to highlight procedural steps taken regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted to confirm the death of a key party affecting ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the current ownership and tax obligations of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sreedharan et al vs Rajesh et al regarding partition of property.
Case Code Year
Case between Sreedharan et al vs Rajesh et al regarding partition of property.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Sat, 07/01/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 01/23/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between P.A.Sajeed vs Muhammed Shihab regarding mandatory injunction and damages
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sadasivan et al vs Valiyedath Subhadra et al regarding partition
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Lakshmikutty Amma et al vs Kozhikode City Service Co-operative Bank et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Padmini vs Yasodha P regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Girish .M vs Sreenivasan.M et al regarding partition of property
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won