Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 91 / 2021

Case between Saifudheen Ibrahim et al vs K.S.Madhusoodanan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Sri.Vivek.P
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration
approximately-3 years 1 month
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs seek a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent them from creating any charge or alienating property allotted to the plaintiffs per a final decree. The case involves disputes arising from a partition suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendants from creating any charge over the plaint schedule property and ordering them to pay the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from creating any charge over the property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendants from creating any charge over the plaint schedule property and ordering them to pay the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiffs sufficiently proved their entitlement to the property and the necessity of an injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiffs sufficiently proved their entitlement to the property and the necessity of an injunction.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs have dislodged their burden which was shifted to the defendant side.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.That the defendants and their men are hereby restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from creating any charge over the plaint schedule property and from illegally alienating the said property to 3rd parties.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saifudheen Ibrahim Office Vala
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o. Late.Ibrahim Davood
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Davood Ibrahim Office Wala
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o. Late.Ibrahim Davood
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saleem Ibrahim Office Wala
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o. Late.Ibrahim Davood
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rasheeda Akbar
Party Age
66
Relation
D/o. Late.Ibrahim Davood
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Idris Akbarli
Relation
S/o. Late. Rasheeda Akbar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.S.Madhusoodanan
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o.. Shanmughan Chettiyar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Brother K.S.Sudhrshan
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o.. Shanmughan Chettiyar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sister K.S.Sathyavathi
Party Age
51
Relation
D/o.. Shanmughan Chettiyar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.S.Valsala Kumari
Party Age
48
Relation
D/o.. Shanmughan Chettiyar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.S.Vasanthakumari
Party Age
41
Relation
D/o.. Shanmughan Chettiyar
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of attorney executed by various plaintiffs in favor of Safdar Hussain, certified copies of decrees and judgments in related cases.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C.Ullas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Manoj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Razal Rahiman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jyothi.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.D.Arun
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Vinod Singh Cheriyan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.T.M.Khalid
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Saranya.O
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Shynu.H
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Seema Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Dheeraj.P.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Namaza.A.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraining the defendants and their men from creating any charge over the plaint schedule property and from illegally alienating the said property to 3rd parties.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs are entitled for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants as prayed for.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Costs of the suit to be paid by the defendants to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendants shall pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Slim Ibrahim Office Wala in favour of Safdar Hussain.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Saifuddin Ibrahim Office Wala in favour of Safdar Hussain.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Rashida Akbar, Electric wala in favour of Safdar Hussain.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Dawood Ibrahim, Office wala in favour of Safdar Hussain.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Certified copy of Final decree
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
In FDIA 1346/2008 in OS 65/1994 of Sub Court, Kozhikode.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certified copy of Commission report with plan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
In FDIA 1346/2008 in OS 65/94 filed before 2nd Addl. Sub Court, Kozhikode.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certified copy of Decree and judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
In OS 65/94 of 2nd Addl. Sub Court, Kozhikode.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Certified copy of Decree and judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
In AS 25/04 and Cross Appeal in AS 25/04 of 1st Addl. District Court, Kozhikode.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Certified Copy of Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
In RSA 51/06 in AS 25/24 of Hon’ble High Court of Kerala.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Certified copy of Petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
In FDA 1346/08 in OS 65/94 of 2nd Additional Sub Court, Kozhikode.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Fareeda Taher, Office wala in favour of Safdar Hussain.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Mehra Murthusa Ali Gadiyali in favour of Safdar Hussain.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Fakhruddin Taiybali Attarwala in favour of Safdar Hussain.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Ibrahim Tahir Office wala in favour of Safdar Hussain.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Certified copy of Final decree
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
In FDIA 1340/08 in OS 65/94 of 2nd Addl. Sub Court, Kozhikode.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Certified copy of Jenmam assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Sudharsan in favour of Abdul Salam.
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Certified Copy of Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
In OP(c) No.276/2015 in FDIA 1346/2008 in OS 65/94 of the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala.
Reference:
Ext.A17
Document Type: Certified copy of Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
In IA 750/17 in FDIA 1346/2008 in OS 65/94 of II nd Addl. Sub Court, Kozhikode.
Reference:
Ext.A18
Document Type: Certified copy of Petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
In IA 1/21 in FDIA 1346/08 in OS 65/94 of II nd Addl. Sub Court, Kozhikode.
Reference:
Ext.A19
Document Type: Certified copy of Petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
In IA 2/21 in FDIA 1346/08 in OS 65/94 of II nd Addl. Sub Court, Kozhikode.
Reference:
Ext.A19(a)
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Idris Akbarali, Electric wala in favour of Safdar Hussain.
Reference:
Ext.A20
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Farida Firoz Kanchwa Wala, in favour of Safdar Hussain.
Reference:
Ext.A21
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Nafisa Shabbir Champa in favour of Safdar Hussain.
Reference:
Ext.A22

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between Saifudheen Ibrahim et al vs K.S.Madhusoodanan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Saifudheen Ibrahim et al vs K.S.Madhusoodanan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Mon, 03/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between V.M. Abdulkhader Muhammed vs Calicut North Service Co-Operative Bank regarding mandatory and prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Narmadha et al vs Marakkath Lal regarding permanent injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Malayil Balan vs Nikhil regarding injunction restraining trespass
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bineesh vs Thekkedath Sreenivasan Nair et al regarding declaration of right and injunction.
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Premi et al vs M.Rijeesh et al regarding recovery of possession and consequential injunction.
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won