Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 367/2024

Case between N. Rathnavally vs M.P. Binoos regarding mandatory injunction and realization of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Savitha T.P
Order Date
2025-07-26
Duration
approximately-1 years 9 months
Case Closed
Sat, 07/26/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, N. Rathnavally, is suing the defendant, M.P. Binoos, for a mandatory injunction and to recover overdue license fees. The defendant has occupied the plaint schedule shed without payment after the license agreement expired.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to vacate the shed and pay the outstanding dues.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to give vacant possession of the plaint schedule room and pay arrears and compensation.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to vacate the shed and pay the outstanding dues.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant was declared exparte and did not provide evidence of payment or legal standing to contest the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff presented evidence of the expired license agreements and claims for arrears that were unchallenged due to the defendant's absence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: - 1.The defendant is directed to give vacant possession of the plaint schedule room to the plaintiff within one month from the date of this order. 2.Defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of Rs.34,000/- (Rupees Thirty Four Thousand Only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit till realization towards the arrears of the license fee.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N. Rathnavally
Party Age
70
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.P. Binoos
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Lawyer Notice, Postal receipts, Returned cover
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.P. Gangadharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Sandeep Krishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Govind.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant directed to give vacant possession of the plaint schedule room to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to give vacant possession of the plaint schedule room to the plaintiff within one month from the date of this order.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant directed to pay Rs.34,000/- towards arrears of the license fee.
Evidence:
Defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of Rs.34,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit till realisation towards the arrears of the license fee.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant directed to pay Rs.24,360/- towards compensation for the unauthorized use of the property.
Evidence:
Defendant is further directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of Rs.24,360/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit till realisation towards the compensation for the use and occupation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff issued lawyer notices to the defendant regarding the arrears of license fee.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the lawyer notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type: Returned Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of the returned cover which was supposed to reach the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another lawyer notice issued to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the second lawyer notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3(a)
Document Type: Returned Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of another returned cover addressed to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between N. Rathnavally vs M.P. Binoos regarding mandatory injunction and realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between N. Rathnavally vs M.P. Binoos regarding mandatory injunction and realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Fri, 07/26/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 07/26/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rajagopalan Nair et al vs Kamalam et al regarding injunction
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ramanattukara Scheduled caste Service Co-operative Society vs Assistant Engineer, N.H. Bypass Division et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction and compensation
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between P.A.Sajeed vs Muhammed Shihab regarding mandatory injunction and damages
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Lakshmikutty Amma et al vs Kozhikode City Service Co-operative Bank et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Padmini vs Yasodha P regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won