Similar Cases
Based on: O. S. No. 315/2025 — Case between Sharafudheen vs Nujumudheen regarding temporary injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS No. 461/2023
Case between Suresh Kumar vs Chicago Constructions International Private Limited et al regarding temporary injunction for unauthorized construction
Suresh Kumar filed a petition against Chicago Constructions International Private Limited and its Managing Director S. Mohanakumar, seeking a temporary injunction to prevent further construction on a property and to remove an unauthorized construction. The case revolves around issues of property possession and encroachment.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.972/2025
Case between Dr. Yamuna Prasad vs PRS Krishna Apartment and Commercial Space Owners Welfare Association regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Dr. Yamuna Prasad and Dr. Asha Prasad, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, the PRS Krishna Apartment and its Secretary, Sajith S. Pillai. The case involves a dispute over the operation of a clinic by the plaintiffs and the defendants' attempts to remove signage related to the clinic.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.839/2021
Case between M/S EDS Structures Private Limited vs M/s Excalibur Group Private Ltd regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
M/S EDS Structures Private Limited is the plaintiff against M/s Excalibur Group Private Ltd and its Managing Director along with two other defendants regarding a dispute over a construction contract. The plaintiff claims that the defendants failed to make payments for services rendered as per an agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1422/2025
Case between E. Asha Thomas Vayalil Kollattu et al vs Emmanuel .K. Thachedathu regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, E. Asha Thomas and Manju Sajan George, are siblings who have filed a suit against their brother Emmanuel .K. Thachedathu regarding their mother's property rights. The case involves concerns over the defendant allegedly attempting to alienate property belonging to their elderly mother, who is suffering from Alzheimer's disease.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1875/2025
Case between Thusar P S vs M/s. Lars Green Automobiles Private Limited et al regarding property dispute
Thusar P S is the plaintiff seeking a remedy against M/s. Lars Green Automobiles Private Limited and several directors regarding a property dispute. The court is considering a petition for security against the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 976/2024
Case between Benny John et al vs Anivrithan regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Benny John and Reena, sought a temporary injunction against the defendant, Anivrithan, to prevent him from selling a property involved in a disputed sale agreement. The defendant contested the allegations, claiming no such agreement existed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 138/2022
Case between M.R. Gopinadhan Nair vs Secretary Perumbavoor Municipality regarding perpetual injunction and mandatory injunction
The case involves M.R. Gopinadhan Nair as the plaintiff, who is asking for a perpetual and mandatory injunction against the Secretary of the Perumbavoor Municipality and others regarding unauthorized constructions. The plaintiff claims that the defendants have violated building rules and encroached on his property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1549/2019
Case between Sasi vs Chokli et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Sasi and Soumini, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Chokli, who attempted to obstruct their access to a pathway critical for their property. The case was brought due to concerns over the defendant's attempts to encroach on the pathway, impacting the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of their land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 76/2025
Case between Muhammed Rija P.M vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Muhammed Rija P.M filed a suit against Thrikkakara Municipality seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction after the municipality removed a business signboard without proper notice. The court found that while the municipality could not act without due process, it could not impose a blanket prohibition on the municipality's actions.
Civil Suit
Partial
O.S. No. 436 of 2022
Case between K.J Thomas et al vs Saumya Maju et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
K.J Thomas and others are plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Saumya Maju and others. The case concerns excavation activities by the defendants that threaten the plaintiffs' properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 545/2024
Case between Soni Francis et al vs Pioneer Nirman India Pvt. (Ltd) et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, Soni Francis and Lizzy Francis, claim their right to an exclusive car parking facility in a property owned by them in Pioneer Towers. They have been denied this right by the defendants, who are involved in managing the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.994/2022
Case between Thulaseedharan.B. vs Bindu et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
The petitioner, Thulaseedharan.B., filed a petition for a temporary prohibitory injunction against defendants Bindu and Geetha regarding an alleged trespass on his property. The case revolves around property ownership disputes and the right to construct on adjacent lands.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.138 /2019
Case between Syed Mohammed Sadik vs Suresh Babu. R.C regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.
Syed Mohammed Sadik and Suresh Babu. R.C are involved in two interconnected suits regarding property disputes over a pathway. The plaintiff claims that the defendant illegally encroached upon the pathway, reducing its width.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.1196/2012
Case between Aloysius E.Gomez et al vs Maglin Lobo regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Aloysius E. Gomez and his wife Mary Lobo filed a suit against Maglin Lobo regarding obstruction in a public pathway. The plaintiffs sought a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendant from constructing a roof over a portion of the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1236/2020
Case between Divya Kumar.P vs Peethambaran et al regarding recovery of possession and mesne profits.
Divya Kumar.P is seeking recovery of possession of her property from her parents and sister, who are currently residing there. The plaintiff contends that the defendants are in illegal possession and has filed this suit after her attempts to evict them were unsuccessful.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.658/2019
Case between Shaji P.R vs Rajani regarding removal of encroachment and restoration of pathway
Shaji P.R filed a suit against his sister Rajani for the removal of an encroachment and restoration of a pathway that provides access to his property. The defendant allegedly constructed a wall blocking the pathway, which the plaintiff claims has caused him hardship.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.476/2021
Case between Dayanandan vs Anila Kumari et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Dayanandan, the absolute owner of a property, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against his sisters and nephew who attempted to trespass onto his property. The court found that the plaintiff was not entitled to relief due to suppression of facts.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1563/2024
Case between T.S. Jayaprakash vs M/s Adrak Builders& Developers Pvt. LTD. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
T.S. Jayaprakash, the plaintiff, claims that M/s Adrak Builders& Developers Pvt. LTD. has unlawfully grabbed his property. The case involves determining the rights over certain properties and includes applications for the appointment of a commissioner and surveyor.
Civil Suit
OS.No.2384/2014
Case between Shibu et al vs Bindhu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and other consequential reliefs.
The plaintiffs, Shibu and Sekharan, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Bindhu, Biju, and Thankamoni, concerning a dispute over property access and construction. The case also has a counterclaim where Bindhu, the plaintiff in the second suit, contends against Shibu and Sekharan regarding property declaration and injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 14/2022
Case between Thankamma Amma et al vs The State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of civil death.
The plaintiffs are the close relatives of Mr. Suresh Babu, who has been missing since 15.08.1990. They seek a declaration of his civil death to facilitate legal proceedings regarding his estate.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 354/2019
Case between Rajendran et al vs M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited et al regarding dismissal for default
This case involves plaintiffs Rajendran, Prasanna, and Ammini against defendants M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited and Sanoj. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of plaintiffs and no evidence being presented.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 236/2018
Case between Sameer vs Laboodha Beevi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Sameer, the plaintiff, has filed a suit against Laboodha Beevi and others regarding a fixed deposit amount of 8,00,000/- in the Thiruvananthapuram District Co-operative Bank. The case concerns the refusal of the defendants to allot Sameer's rightful share of the deposit after the death of their father.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 310/2018
Case between Jacob vs Jetroode regarding declaration of title by adverse possession
Jacob, the plaintiff, is claiming title to a property through adverse possession against his sister, Jetroode, who has made claims over the same property. The dispute arises from historical family possession and alleged title rights.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 328/2018
Case between Sahir M.H. vs Kerala Small Industries Development Corporation Limited regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Sahir M.H. filed a suit against the Kerala Small Industries Development Corporation Limited regarding a dispute about the outright sale and eviction from a shed he rented for his cattle feed production business. The case addresses the plaintiff's rights as a tenant and disputes over the property ownership.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 198/2021
Case between Ayyappan vs Chandramathy regarding dismissal of suit
Ayyappan, the plaintiff, initiated a suit against Chandramathy, the defendant. The court dismissed the suit after the plaintiff's counsel filed a not pressed memo.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 323/2019
Case between Darsana vs Rajamma et al regarding partition of property
Darsana filed a suit for partition and fixation of boundary regarding her half right over certain properties. The defendants include her mother-in-law Rajamma and her brother-in-law Vijayakumar, who contest her claims based on prior family agreements.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 47/ 2025
Case between Arun. B.R. vs M/s Indigo Capital (Indigo) Pvt Ltd regarding injunction against business interference.
Arun. B.R. is the plaintiff seeking an injunction against M/s Indigo Capital (Indigo) Pvt Ltd. The court is addressing a request for temporary relief to prevent interference in the plaintiff's business.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 47/2025
Case between Arun. B.R. vs M/s Indigo Capital (India) Pvt Ltd regarding injunction.
Arun. B.R. is the petitioner seeking an ad-interim injunction against M/s Indigo Capital (India) Pvt Ltd and its director Mahesh Michael. The court found a prima facie case and granted temporary relief to prevent interference with the petitioner's business.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 54/2024
Case between Sony.V.G vs Azhakamma. P et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Sony.V.G, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Azhakamma. P and Saboora Beevi, who have allegedly trespassed and illegally constructed on her property. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property based on a settlement deed and power of attorney.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 246/2008
Case between Muhammed Ilyas vs Safarulla et al regarding dismissal for default
The plaintiffs are Muhammed Ilyas and Thajudeen, while the defendants include Safarulla, Jameela, and Mariyam Beevi. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and no steps were taken to adduce evidence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 160/2022
Case between Vilambhagam Plavazhikam Residents Association vs Sasikumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs are the Vilambhagam Plavazhikam Residents Association and its secretary, Salim. They are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants who allegedly conducted an illegal annual general body meeting and made unauthorized decisions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 241/2016
Case between Sajeev vs Vasantha Kumari et al regarding partition of property
The plaintiff, Sajeev, and the defendants, Vasantha Kumari and Usha, are siblings seeking a partition of their mother's property. The mother passed away in 2011, and the plaintiff claims a share in the jointly owned property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 273/2015
Case between Rafeeka et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding default dismissal of the suit
Rafeeka and others are the plaintiffs, while the State of Kerala and its officials are the defendants. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and no steps were taken to proceed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 158/ 2024
Case between Unnikrishnan Potty vs Vijayakrishnan Nampoothiri regarding dismissal for default
Unnikrishnan Potty is the plaintiff and Vijayakrishnan Nampoothiri is the defendant. The plaintiff did not appear in court despite multiple opportunities, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 107/2025
Case between Abdulla Sons Private Limited Company et al vs Aneesh regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves Abdulla Sons Private Limited Company and its Managing Director P.Ahammed Kutty against Aneesh regarding a dispute over property boundaries and the installation of a no parking board. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to prevent the defendant from obstructing their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 288/2023
Case between Saju vs Varkala Municipality et al regarding granting a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction
Saju is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Varkala Municipality and its officials, claiming they are attempting to illegally close down his hotel business. The case involves disputes over the operation of the hotel and alleged influence from the property's previous owner, Mr. Mohankumar.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.856/2018
Case between Jayan. K.S et al vs M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Jayan. K.S and Jayakumari Jayan, are a husband and wife facing threats from the defendants, M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd and its officers, regarding a loan for a truck. They seek a permanent injunction to prevent the defendants from entering their rented house and making threats related to the loan.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 13/2018
Case between M/s Swapna Bone Meal Co. vs V.J. Joy et al regarding perpetual injunction
M/s Swapna Bone Meal Co. seeks a perpetual injunction against V.J. Joy and others to prevent them from obstructing the operation of the bone meal unit. The defendants claim that the operation is illegal, causing environmental pollution and health risks to nearby residents.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 292/2025
Case between Samson T George et al vs Arun Kumar Karerat et al regarding temporary injunction
This case involves petitioners Samson T George and Babu Mathew seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents Arun Kumar Karerat, Samson Fernandez, Annerine Mildred D’Silva, and MIR Realtors Pvt. Ltd. The petitioners argue that failure to grant the injunction will cause them irreparable harm.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1125/2024
Case between Leena Sham vs M/s Google L L C et al regarding a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Leena Sham has filed a suit against YouTube and her daughter, Sharikka Sham, seeking a permanent injunction to remove a video uploaded by her deceased son. The video is claimed to violate her privacy and has caused distress to the family after the son's death.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 626 /2022
Case between Aseeb vs Nahas et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Aseeb, a senior citizen, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing his access to a pathway that he claims is essential for ingress and egress to his property. The defendants, relatives of the plaintiff, contest the existence of the claimed pathway and the plaintiff's rights over it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 995 / 2019
Case between Suresh Babu T vs Kiran M B et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Suresh Babu T, filed a suit against Kiran M B and Grace Cheriyan for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent his forcible eviction from a leased property. The plaintiff claims he invested significantly in his business and fears illegal dispossession by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 571 / 2020
Case between M/s Sinergia Media Labs LLP vs M/s Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, M/s Sinergia Media Labs LLP, filed a suit against the defendant, M/s Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd, seeking protection against eviction and service disruption. The case revolves around alleged non-payment of rent during the COVID-19 pandemic and the plaintiff's apprehension of unlawful eviction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 244 / 2023
Case between M/s Melmont Constructions Pvt. Ltd. et al vs Jayesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, M/s Melmont Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and others, are seeking a permanent injunction against the defendants, who are members of the Youth Wing of 'Lok Tantric Janata Dal', for obstructing access to the plaintiffs' development project in Ernakulam. The defendants staged protests claiming illegal activities by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 563/2025
Case between Jisha Mathew vs Jasar M K et al regarding temporary injunction.
Jisha Mathew, acting as the authorized agent of Mr. Ranjith Krishnan, filed a petition for temporary injunction against Jasar M K and Anas M A, who are alleged to have dumped waste on the property owned by Mr. Ranjith. The defendants denied the allegations and claimed ownership rights over the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1065/2017
Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions
The plaintiffs, M.V. Shafi and M.V. Shanavas, contend they are entitled to a share of their father's property, claiming that the partitions made by their father, M M. Vahabudeen, are null and void. The defendants argue against this claim and state the suit is not maintainable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1295/2023
Case between Aravindan Nair et al vs Ramachandran Nair et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, who are siblings, sought a partition of property from the defendants, also siblings, after the death of their sister. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants were obstructing their rights to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1645/2022
Case between M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Remya.S et al regarding recovery of money.
M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendants due to their failure to repay. The case was heard ex-parte as the defendants did not appear in court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won