Similar Cases
Based on: Original Suit No.70/2020 — Case between Prasu et al vs Lilil Kumar regarding recovery of possession and realization of damages
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
Original Suit. No. 14/ 2021
Case between Shalu vs State of Kerala et al regarding granting a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction
Shalu is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the State of Kerala and other defendants to prevent them from encroaching on her property. The case involves issues of property rights and claims of encroachment by Mr. Mohammed Shafi and government officials.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.994/2022
Case between Thulaseedharan.B. vs Bindu et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
The petitioner, Thulaseedharan.B., filed a petition for a temporary prohibitory injunction against defendants Bindu and Geetha regarding an alleged trespass on his property. The case revolves around property ownership disputes and the right to construct on adjacent lands.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.138 /2019
Case between Syed Mohammed Sadik vs Suresh Babu. R.C regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.
Syed Mohammed Sadik and Suresh Babu. R.C are involved in two interconnected suits regarding property disputes over a pathway. The plaintiff claims that the defendant illegally encroached upon the pathway, reducing its width.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.549/2017
Case between Dr. Aggy. S. Valentine vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory injunction and other reliefs
The plaintiff, Dr. Aggy. S. Valentine, alleges that the defendants unlawfully demolished her compound wall and trespassed on her property. The case revolves around her request for a mandatory injunction to restore her property and prevent further unauthorized actions by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.1196/2012
Case between Aloysius E.Gomez et al vs Maglin Lobo regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Aloysius E. Gomez and his wife Mary Lobo filed a suit against Maglin Lobo regarding obstruction in a public pathway. The plaintiffs sought a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendant from constructing a roof over a portion of the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.509/2016
Case between K. Somasekhara Pillai vs Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, K. Somasekhara Pillai, is involved in a dispute over property rights with the defendants, including the Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram. He claims they unlawfully entered his property and cut down coconut trees, leading to a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.507/2014
Case between T.Sarojam et al vs Santhamma et al regarding fixation and putting up of boundary and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, T.Sarojam and others, filed a suit against the defendants, Santhamma and others, seeking to fix boundaries and prevent the defendants from trespassing on their property. The plaintiffs' predecessor had ownership of the property, but the defendants attempted to create rights over it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1236/2020
Case between Divya Kumar.P vs Peethambaran et al regarding recovery of possession and mesne profits.
Divya Kumar.P is seeking recovery of possession of her property from her parents and sister, who are currently residing there. The plaintiff contends that the defendants are in illegal possession and has filed this suit after her attempts to evict them were unsuccessful.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.242/2020
Case between Rajendran vs The City Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Rajendran, is seeking a prohibitory injunction against the City Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram to prevent them from removing a portable bunk he claims to own. The defendant contends that the installation of this bunk is illegal and the plaintiff does not have the required license.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.283/2018
Case between Nimmy Manuel et al vs Regional Head, Federal Bank Limited et al regarding declaration of title and other reliefs
The plaintiffs are the legal heirs of Sri. T.V. Manuel who died on 20/06/2010. They filed a suit to operate a locker that the deceased had with Federal Bank, which the bank denies due to a nominee claim by the third defendant.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.1003/2024
Case between Omana et al vs Sivakumar et al regarding boundary and injunction.
The plaintiffs, Omana and Shalini, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Sivakumar, Geetha Kumari, and Vasanthakumari, regarding trespass and the construction of compound walls on their property. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants have been illegally trespassing onto their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.163/2024
Case between Sarah Ann Koshy et al vs M/s Cloud 9 Apartment Owner’s Association et al regarding temporary injunction.
The plaintiffs, Sarah Ann Koshy and Sony George, are joint owners of flat No.2B in Cloud 9 Apartment and seek to prevent the defendants from obstructing their access to a terrace area. The defendants, representing the apartment owners' association, argue that the plaintiffs unlawfully trespassed into a restricted common area.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.658/2019
Case between Shaji P.R vs Rajani regarding removal of encroachment and restoration of pathway
Shaji P.R filed a suit against his sister Rajani for the removal of an encroachment and restoration of a pathway that provides access to his property. The defendant allegedly constructed a wall blocking the pathway, which the plaintiff claims has caused him hardship.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.476/2021
Case between Dayanandan vs Anila Kumari et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Dayanandan, the absolute owner of a property, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against his sisters and nephew who attempted to trespass onto his property. The court found that the plaintiff was not entitled to relief due to suppression of facts.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1563/2024
Case between T.S. Jayaprakash vs M/s Adrak Builders& Developers Pvt. LTD. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
T.S. Jayaprakash, the plaintiff, claims that M/s Adrak Builders& Developers Pvt. LTD. has unlawfully grabbed his property. The case involves determining the rights over certain properties and includes applications for the appointment of a commissioner and surveyor.
Civil Suit
OS. No.1276/2016
Case between Dr. Abraham George Plavelil vs S. Ambili et al regarding mandatory injunction and consequential reliefs.
The plaintiff, Dr. Abraham George Plavelil, is seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants, S. Ambili and V. Thankappan Nadar, who are occupying the plaint schedule property that he claims ownership over. The defendants allegedly obstructed the plaintiff's access to the property after the death of his father.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.2384/2014
Case between Shibu et al vs Bindhu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and other consequential reliefs.
The plaintiffs, Shibu and Sekharan, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Bindhu, Biju, and Thankamoni, concerning a dispute over property access and construction. The case also has a counterclaim where Bindhu, the plaintiff in the second suit, contends against Shibu and Sekharan regarding property declaration and injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 923/2018
Case between Jerro Pereira et al vs Velayudhan Nair et al regarding injunction and counter claim.
This case involves a dispute between the plaintiffs, Jerro Pereira and Shyja Jerro, and the defendants, Velayudhan Nair and Indira Devi, regarding the use of a pathway and related properties. The plaintiffs claimed obstruction by the defendants over their access pathway and filed for an injunction.
Civil Suit
Partial
OS. No.93/2023
Case between Vijayan.M vs Priji Chandran regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and other consequential reliefs.
The plaintiff, Vijayan.M, purchased property from the defendant, Priji Chandran, but the defendant threatened to take possession of the property. The court proceedings were held ex parte as the defendant did not file a written statement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 273/2022
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and possession
The plaintiffs, Margaret Solomon Cruz and others, are seeking a declaration of title and possession over a property that they claim to be rightfully theirs. The defendants, Mabel James and others, contest this claim, stating that the property has been rightfully assigned to them.
Civil Suit
Original Suit No. 257/2020
Case between A.K. Naseer vs Jamal Sha regarding declaration of title and consequential decree of permanent prohibitory injunction.
A.K. Naseer is the plaintiff seeking declaration of title and a permanent injunction against Jamal Sha. The dispute arises over possession and ownership of certain properties in Edava village.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 257/ 2020
Case between A.K. Naseer vs Jamal Sha regarding declaration of title and injunction
A.K. Naseer is the plaintiff claiming ownership of property in Edava village. The defendant, Jamal Sha, has allegedly attempted to trespass on the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 310/2018
Case between Jacob vs Jetroode regarding declaration of title by adverse possession
Jacob, the plaintiff, is claiming title to a property through adverse possession against his sister, Jetroode, who has made claims over the same property. The dispute arises from historical family possession and alleged title rights.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 314/2020
Case between Vijaya et al vs Kamalakshy et al regarding declaration of settlement deeds null and void and partition of properties
The plaintiffs, comprising the family of late Mr. Sajeev, are seeking to declare settlement deeds as null and void and to partition certain properties. The defendants are siblings and relatives of Mr. Sajeev, contesting the validity of these claims.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 328/2018
Case between Sahir M.H. vs Kerala Small Industries Development Corporation Limited regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Sahir M.H. filed a suit against the Kerala Small Industries Development Corporation Limited regarding a dispute about the outright sale and eviction from a shed he rented for his cattle feed production business. The case addresses the plaintiff's rights as a tenant and disputes over the property ownership.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 323/2019
Case between Darsana vs Rajamma et al regarding partition of property
Darsana filed a suit for partition and fixation of boundary regarding her half right over certain properties. The defendants include her mother-in-law Rajamma and her brother-in-law Vijayakumar, who contest her claims based on prior family agreements.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 366/2020
Case between Hafsa vs Saboora Beevi regarding declaration of easement right by prescription
This case involves a dispute between a married couple, the plaintiffs, and the defendant over the right of easement by prescription for a motorable road. The plaintiffs claim that they have been using a portion of the road for access to their property without any interruption since 1993.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 314/2019
Case between Anarkali vs Renjith Jayan et al regarding declaration of title and possession.
Anarkali is seeking a declaration of title and possession over a property she claims belongs to her, which the defendants have encroached upon. The court examined the evidence presented and the ongoing disputes between the parties regarding property boundaries.
Civil Suit
Partial
Original Suit No. 24/2016
Case between Sharafudeen vs The Kerala State et al regarding declaration of title and possession.
Sharafudeen filed a suit against The Kerala State and other defendants for declaration of title and possession over certain property based on adverse possession. The plaintiff sought to protect his title after the defendants attempted to take the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 247/2022
Case between Shamsudeen. A vs State of Kerala regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Shamsudeen. A and Sabeena Beevi, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants for improperly acquiring their land and undervaluing the compensation. The defendants are the State of Kerala and various governmental authorities involved in the land acquisition process.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 107/2021
Case between Manoj vs Retnakumar regarding cancellation of settlement deed and injunction
Manoj is the plaintiff seeking cancellation of a settlement deed executed in favor of Retnakumar, who is his brother. The suit addresses issues of property rights and the mental capacity of their father when the deed was executed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 160/2022
Case between Vilambhagam Plavazhikam Residents Association vs Sasikumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs are the Vilambhagam Plavazhikam Residents Association and its secretary, Salim. They are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants who allegedly conducted an illegal annual general body meeting and made unauthorized decisions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 350/2025
Case between Kairali vs Aravind. K. Shaji et al regarding partition of property and temporary injunction.
Kairali is the plaintiff seeking a partition of the property and a temporary injunction against the respondents. The respondents, Aravind. K. Shaji and Appu. K. Shaji, are the defendants who allegedly attempted to interfere with Kairali's possession of the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 149/ 2018
Case between Devadas et al vs Deputy Tahsildhar regarding declaration and granting a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Devadas and Ambika, filed a suit seeking a declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the attachment of properties they purchased. The defendant, Deputy Tahsildhar, opposed the suit on grounds that the sale deed was not legally valid due to prior attachments.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 241/2016
Case between Sajeev vs Vasantha Kumari et al regarding partition of property
The plaintiff, Sajeev, and the defendants, Vasantha Kumari and Usha, are siblings seeking a partition of their mother's property. The mother passed away in 2011, and the plaintiff claims a share in the jointly owned property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 348/2022
Case between Janardhanan Pillai vs Babu et al regarding declaration and decree of permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Janardhanan Pillai, is seeking a declaration of title and possession over certain properties and injunction against the defendants living in a building on said properties. The plaintiff claims the defendants have no legal rights to the properties they occupy.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit & Counter Claim No. 276/2016
Case between Nisamudeen vs Reena et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
Nisamudeen is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction and a mandatory injunction against the defendants Reena, Khalid, and Nahas. The case involves a dispute over property rights and attempts by the defendants to encroach upon the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 11/2018
Case between Raju vs Ratheesh Kumar regarding partition
The plaintiff and defendant were friends who conducted business together. The plaintiff filed a suit for partition of property purchased jointly with the defendant after a difference of opinion arose between them.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 27/2013
Case between Venugopal et al vs Vasanthakumari et al regarding declaration and decree of permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs are members of the Elambana family seeking a declaration that certain fraudulent documents regarding their property are null and void. The defendants, including legal heirs of a deceased member, dispute the plaintiffs' claims to the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 285/2018
Case between Sainabakunju vs Radhamani regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Sainabakunju, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Radhamani, who is allegedly obstructing the use of a pathway crucial for access to the public road. The case involves evidence of ownership and obstruction related to the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 359/2023
Case between Sarojini vs Anitha et al regarding declaration of easement right and temporary injunction
This case involves a mother and daughter, Sarojini and Bindhu, who seek to declare their easement rights over certain properties. They are opposed by Anitha and Thulaseedharan, who have rights over the properties in question.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 94/2022
Case between Mohanachandran Nair et al vs Kerala State Government et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, including siblings and their children, are involved in a case against government officials regarding the ownership and use of certain properties. They seek protection against encroachment by government entities.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 86/2021
Case between Janin vs Asokan, Binod, Gopikumar, Sathyaseelan regarding partition
The plaintiff, Janin, is involved in a suit for partition of inherited property. The defendants are Asokan, Binod, Gopikumar, and Sathyaseelan, who are also related to the property in question.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 188/2014
Case between Saraswathy vs Sudhakaran et al regarding setting aside sale deed
This case involves Saraswathy, the first plaintiff, seeking to set aside a sale deed executed in favor of the first defendant, Sudhakaran. The plaintiffs allege that the deed was obtained through fraud and coercion.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.338/2018
Case between Biji.R vs Sheeja regarding specific performance
Biji.R filed a suit against Sheeja for specific performance of a contract regarding the sale of a property. The plaintiff claims that the defendant failed to execute the sale deed despite receiving an advance sale consideration.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.504/2015
Case between Ramesan vs Sujatha et al regarding partition of ancestral property.
The plaintiff Ramesan seeks a partition of the ancestral property claimed jointly with the defendants, who are siblings. The case arises from disputes over the joint possession and ownership of property following the death of their mother.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1295/2023
Case between Aravindan Nair et al vs Ramachandran Nair et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, who are siblings, sought a partition of property from the defendants, also siblings, after the death of their sister. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants were obstructing their rights to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.377/2017
Case between Nazarudeen. A vs Tom.D et al regarding suit for declaration, recovery of possession, and injunction
The plaintiffs, Nazarudeen. A and Laila Beegum, are husband and wife seeking legal remedies for property encroachment. The defendants, Tom.D and Johnson, are accused of unlawfully taking possession of a portion of the plaintiffs' property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won