Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 923/2018

Case between Jerro Pereira et al vs Velayudhan Nair et al regarding injunction and counter claim.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-11-21
Duration
approximately-7 years 5 months
Case Closed
Fri, 11/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a dispute between the plaintiffs, Jerro Pereira and Shyja Jerro, and the defendants, Velayudhan Nair and Indira Devi, regarding the use of a pathway and related properties. The plaintiffs claimed obstruction by the defendants over their access pathway and filed for an injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court issued a mixed judgment in which the plaintiffs were granted a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants regarding the use of the pathway and the defendants' counter claim was allowed to an extent, restraining the plaintiffs from blocking the pathway as well.
Judgment Favored
Partial
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from blocking plaint B schedule pathway.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court issued a mixed judgment in which the plaintiffs were granted a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants regarding the use of the pathway and the defendants' counter claim was allowed to an extent, restraining the plaintiffs from blocking the pathway as well.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs entitled to use plaint B schedule pathway.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiffs entitled to use plaint B schedule pathway.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs have obtained exclusive right of way through plaint B schedule property by virtue of Ext.A1 deed.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed in part and counter claim decreed as follows: 1) The defendants are restrained from committing any waste or mischief on plaint B schedule pathway, from blocking the plaint B schedule pathway and from disturbing or obstructing the enjoyment of plaint A and B schedule properties by the plaintiffs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jerro Pereira
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shyja Jerro
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Velayudhan Nair
Party Age
70
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Indira Devi
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of sale deed No.1679/2000, Tax receipts dated 24/07/2017 and 15/08/2018.
Defendants Documents
Certified copy of settlement deed B1, Certified copy of sale deed No.3031/1990.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.K.Hari Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V.Bahuleyan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs sought to restrain the defendants from causing obstruction to the plaint B schedule pathway.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs are entitled for a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction to the extent of restraining the defendants from committing any waste or mischief on plaint B schedule pathway.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants sought to restrain plaintiffs from blocking the counter claim schedule property.
Evidence:
The counter claim is allowed and the plaintiffs are restrained from blocking the counter claim schedule property by installing gate and lock on it.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Costs where each party bears their own.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of suit and relief sought for, both parties shall bear their respective costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiffs purchased plaint A schedule property as per this deed.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipts relevant to the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The deed which established the property rights of the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The deed for property purchased by the second defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report on the status and nature of the properties involved.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Sketch accompanying the commission report detailing the properties.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between Jerro Pereira et al vs Velayudhan Nair et al regarding injunction and counter claim.
Case Code Year
Case between Jerro Pereira et al vs Velayudhan Nair et al regarding injunction and counter claim.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 06/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 11/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between K. Somasekhara Pillai vs Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Aloysius E.Gomez et al vs Maglin Lobo regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. Aggy. S. Valentine vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory injunction and other reliefs
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Syed Mohammed Sadik vs Suresh Babu. R.C regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thulaseedharan.B. vs Bindu et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Court of Additional Munsiff (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won