Similar Cases
Based on: OS.No.1214/2014 — Case between Madathuvilakam Ilangam Temple et al vs Rajan et al regarding settlement scheme and injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS.No.1484/2022
Case between Kanjiravilakom Devi Temple et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal
This case involves Kanjiravilakom Devi Temple and its representatives against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was heard and subsequently dismissed as withdrawn by the court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1369/2023
Case between Rajan.K. vs Syamakumar et al regarding dismissal as not pressed
The plaintiff, Rajan.K., representing the Idiyadikode Bhagavathi Temple Trust, filed a suit against Syamakumar and Rajakumar, who are members of the same trust. The court ultimately dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1895/2022
Case between Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devaswom vs S.Venugopal regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves a suit filed by Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devaswom against S.Venugopal. The court rejected the plaint due to failure to remit the balance court fee.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.684/2019
Case between Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple Trust vs Government of Kerala et al regarding a civil suit
The case involves the Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple Trust as the plaintiff against the Government of Kerala and other defendants. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff during the trial.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.470/2024
Case between Chempazhanthy Asharivilakam Sree Bhadrakalimandramoorthy Temple Family Trust et al vs Kuttan Asari et al regarding dismissal for default.
The plaintiffs, represented by their Secretary Sukumaran Asari, are a temple family trust. The case involved a suit that was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the plaintiffs and lack of action to summon the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1241/2022
Case between Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple vs R.Sukumaran Nair regarding mandatory injunction and recovery of possession
The plaintiff, Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple, is seeking a mandatory injunction to evict the defendant, R.Sukumaran Nair, from a shop room. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has occupied the shop without legal permission after the lease was terminated.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.504/2015
Case between Ramesan vs Sujatha et al regarding partition of ancestral property.
The plaintiff Ramesan seeks a partition of the ancestral property claimed jointly with the defendants, who are siblings. The case arises from disputes over the joint possession and ownership of property following the death of their mother.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1295/2023
Case between Aravindan Nair et al vs Ramachandran Nair et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, who are siblings, sought a partition of property from the defendants, also siblings, after the death of their sister. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants were obstructing their rights to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.377/2017
Case between Nazarudeen. A vs Tom.D et al regarding suit for declaration, recovery of possession, and injunction
The plaintiffs, Nazarudeen. A and Laila Beegum, are husband and wife seeking legal remedies for property encroachment. The defendants, Tom.D and Johnson, are accused of unlawfully taking possession of a portion of the plaintiffs' property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.772/2021
Case between Sarathchandran Nair.J vs Government of India et al regarding boundary measurement and injunction
The petitioner Sarathchandran Nair is seeking to measure and demarcate certain properties against the defendants, which include the Government of India and the Indian Coast Guard. The defendants dispute the plaintiff's claims over the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.637/2015
Case between R. Saroja vs Sivathanu @ Murugan et al regarding partition of plaint schedule properties.
R. Saroja filed a suit for partition of properties originally belonging to her deceased mother and grandmother against Sivathanu @ Murugan and others. The plaintiff claims her share was not properly recognized in prior partition arrangements.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.994/2022
Case between Thulaseedharan.B. vs Bindu et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
The petitioner, Thulaseedharan.B., filed a petition for a temporary prohibitory injunction against defendants Bindu and Geetha regarding an alleged trespass on his property. The case revolves around property ownership disputes and the right to construct on adjacent lands.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.134/2014
Case between Sathya Bhama et al vs Surendran et al regarding setting aside a sale deed
The plaintiff, Sathya Bhama, claims that the first defendant fraudulently obtained her property while she was suffering from a mental condition. The case seeks to set aside the sale deed executed in favor of Surendran, the first defendant.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1407/2015
Case between Susheela Devi. B. et al vs Anil Kumar et al regarding putting up of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, including the deceased Susheela Devi, are seeking to establish property boundaries and prevent the defendants from encroaching on their land. The defendants have previously trespassed and caused damage to the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.138 /2019
Case between Syed Mohammed Sadik vs Suresh Babu. R.C regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.
Syed Mohammed Sadik and Suresh Babu. R.C are involved in two interconnected suits regarding property disputes over a pathway. The plaintiff claims that the defendant illegally encroached upon the pathway, reducing its width.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.549/2017
Case between Dr. Aggy. S. Valentine vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory injunction and other reliefs
The plaintiff, Dr. Aggy. S. Valentine, alleges that the defendants unlawfully demolished her compound wall and trespassed on her property. The case revolves around her request for a mandatory injunction to restore her property and prevent further unauthorized actions by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1687/2013
Case between Valsala vs Sasidharan Nadar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Valsala, claims ownership and access rights to a pathway leading to her property, which the defendants, Sasidharan Nadar and his daughter Soumya, are obstructing. The defendants dispute these claims and argue that the plaintiff has no right over the pathway.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1785/2018
Case between Ajithkhan et al vs Directorate of Factories & Boilers et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Ajithkhan, Anupkhan, and Ayubkhan, are children of Smt. Khadeejabeevi and Sri. Safarulla, seeking to prevent the defendants, including the Directorate of Factories & Boilers, from obstructing their right to use a pathway. The dispute revolves around the use of a pathway claimed by both parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.427/2021
Case between Rajesh Balakrishnan vs Sunitha Sundar et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Rajesh Balakrishnan, the plaintiff, seeks partition of property and injunction against his sister, her husband, and his mother. The dispute revolves around property inherited from their father.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.396/2013
Case between Bindhu.T vs Prasad regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Bindhu.T, seeks a decree for the fixation of boundaries and a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Prasad, who is encroaching on her property. The defendant contends that there has been no encroachment and seeks dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.783/2020
Case between Gladstone.D et al vs Lilibai et al regarding partition and injunction.
The plaintiffs, descendants of Sri. Daveed, sought partition of a property after his death. The defendants, descendants of another legal heir, challenged the plaintiffs' claims, leading to a legal dispute over property ownership and injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.48/2025
Case between Govind.D.C vs Adhul et al regarding trespassing and injunction
Govind.D.C, the plaintiff, is seeking an injunction against Adhul, Salim, and the BCG Horizon Association to prevent them from trespassing into his property. The defendants claim the right to the common areas as a registered association.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.475/2021
Case between Vinod S Nair vs Sini Shafeekh et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Vinod S Nair, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Sini Shafeekh and others regarding the possession of a vehicle and allegations of fraud. The plaintiff claimed that he is entitled to possess a vehicle due to an agreement with the defendants, while the defendants denied any such agreement and raised various counterclaims.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.509/2016
Case between K. Somasekhara Pillai vs Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, K. Somasekhara Pillai, is involved in a dispute over property rights with the defendants, including the Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram. He claims they unlawfully entered his property and cut down coconut trees, leading to a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.507/2014
Case between T.Sarojam et al vs Santhamma et al regarding fixation and putting up of boundary and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, T.Sarojam and others, filed a suit against the defendants, Santhamma and others, seeking to fix boundaries and prevent the defendants from trespassing on their property. The plaintiffs' predecessor had ownership of the property, but the defendants attempted to create rights over it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1236/2020
Case between Divya Kumar.P vs Peethambaran et al regarding recovery of possession and mesne profits.
Divya Kumar.P is seeking recovery of possession of her property from her parents and sister, who are currently residing there. The plaintiff contends that the defendants are in illegal possession and has filed this suit after her attempts to evict them were unsuccessful.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1063/2014
Case between Sathi.V vs Francis et al regarding recovery of possession and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs are the legal heirs of the deceased Reghu Kumar, seeking to recover possession of property from the defendants, who they claim are trespassers. The case involves issues of ownership and entitlement to the property after the death of the real owner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.242/2020
Case between Rajendran vs The City Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Rajendran, is seeking a prohibitory injunction against the City Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram to prevent them from removing a portable bunk he claims to own. The defendant contends that the installation of this bunk is illegal and the plaintiff does not have the required license.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.387/2021
Case between Saji David vs Shibu David regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Saji David filed a suit against his brother Shibu David for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The dispute arose over a property partitioned between them after their mother's death, with the plaintiff claiming the defendant is obstructing his possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1426/2019
Case between Sreekala vs Milton Leen Fernandez et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Sreekala, the plaintiff, filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against Milton Leen Fernandez and his wife, Shynymole Varghese. The plaintiff claims unlawful interference by the defendants in her peaceful possession and enjoyment of her properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.163/2024
Case between Sarah Ann Koshy et al vs M/s Cloud 9 Apartment Owner’s Association et al regarding temporary injunction.
The plaintiffs, Sarah Ann Koshy and Sony George, are joint owners of flat No.2B in Cloud 9 Apartment and seek to prevent the defendants from obstructing their access to a terrace area. The defendants, representing the apartment owners' association, argue that the plaintiffs unlawfully trespassed into a restricted common area.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.658/2019
Case between Shaji P.R vs Rajani regarding removal of encroachment and restoration of pathway
Shaji P.R filed a suit against his sister Rajani for the removal of an encroachment and restoration of a pathway that provides access to his property. The defendant allegedly constructed a wall blocking the pathway, which the plaintiff claims has caused him hardship.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.572/2021
Case between Abdul Rahim vs Suneesh.S.Anand regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, Abdul Rahim and Abdul Latheef, claim ownership of property and seek a mandatory injunction against the defendant, Suneesh.S.Anand, related to a lease agreement that they argue is void due to non-compliance. The defendant contends the suit is not maintainable, citing issues with the lease's validity and a claim for a refund of a security deposit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.240/2023
Case between Sree Narayana Bhaktha Janasamithi et al vs Sreekumar. S et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves the Sree Narayana Bhaktha Janasamithi and its president Jagannathan against defendants Sreekumar. S and Rejith.S. The plaintiffs sought a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from interfering with the administration and renovation works of a family temple.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.476/2021
Case between Dayanandan vs Anila Kumari et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Dayanandan, the absolute owner of a property, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against his sisters and nephew who attempted to trespass onto his property. The court found that the plaintiff was not entitled to relief due to suppression of facts.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.425/2023
Case between Chithra.L vs Noorjahan regarding declaration, fixation of boundary, and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Chithra.L and her daughter Radhu, are seeking a declaration of their easementary right and an injunction against the defendant, Noorjahan, regarding property access issues. The plaintiffs allege the defendant attempted to obstruct their access to their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1430/2023
Case between Shiras Majeed vs Arun.R et al regarding recovery of possession.
Shiras Majeed filed a suit against Arun.R and Ajayakumar for recovery of possession of a house and property that he claims belongs to him. The defendants resided in the property without his consent, prompting the plaintiff to seek legal eviction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1256/2020
Case between Santhamma.S vs K. Sasidharan Nair regarding partition of property
Santhamma.S, the plaintiff, is the widow of Late Sri. Kesava Pillai @ Kesavan Nair and is seeking a partition of property she shares with her son, K. Sasidharan Nair, the defendant. The plaintiff claims rights to a larger share of the property but the court found her claims insufficient due to lack of critical documentation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.160/2023
Case between M/s. Attukal Shopping Complex Pvt. Ltd vs City Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs.
M/s. Attukal Shopping Complex Pvt. Ltd filed a suit against the City Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram seeking a permanent injunction. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant is wrongfully renewing D&O licenses for former licensees without the required consent after termination of their licenses.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1677/2013
Case between Surendran Nair vs S. Jayakumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and setting aside a Will
The case involves Surendran Nair as the plaintiff, who claims ownership of property based on a Will executed by Smt. Rajamma. The defendants, including S. Jayakumar and others, are contesting the validity of the Will and asserting their own rights over the property, alleging fraud and undue influence.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1677/2013
Case between Surendran Nair vs S. Jayakumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and setting aside a Will
Surendran Nair is the plaintiff in a suit against S. Jayakumar and others, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction and claiming ownership of a property by virtue of a Will executed in his favor. The defendants are contesting the validity of the Will and claiming rights over the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.2384/2014
Case between Shibu et al vs Bindhu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and other consequential reliefs.
The plaintiffs, Shibu and Sekharan, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Bindhu, Biju, and Thankamoni, concerning a dispute over property access and construction. The case also has a counterclaim where Bindhu, the plaintiff in the second suit, contends against Shibu and Sekharan regarding property declaration and injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.761/2020
Case between Umadevi. G vs Hareendranath G.S regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Umadevi. G filed a suit against her brother Hareendranath G.S for partitioning their inherited properties and seeking a prohibitory injunction against any construction. The suit arose due to conflicts over the properties acquired by their deceased parents.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1237/2018
Case between Dr.(Col). B. Ramesh vs State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of title and possession.
The plaintiff, Dr.(Col). B. Ramesh, sought a declaration of title and possession against the State of Kerala and its officials regarding a property he claims to have owned since 1978. The defendants argue that the land in question actually belongs to the government and is classified as puramboke land.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.606/2019
Case between M. Lalitha @ Lalitha Rajagopal vs Surya Kumari et al regarding partition and permanent injunction.
The case involves a suit filed by M. Lalitha against Surya Kumari and her children for partition of property and a permanent injunction. The plaintiff claims co-ownership of the property inherited from their father, while the defendants contest this claim based on a will that they allege bequeathed the property to them.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 473/2016
Case between Koozhoor Bhagavathi Kshethram represented by Rakesh Venugopal vs Mazhuvannoor Grama Panchayat regarding perpetual injunction
The case involves a dispute over property rights between Koozhoor Bhagavathi Kshethram and Mazhuvannoor Grama Panchayat. The plaintiff is seeking a perpetual injunction to prevent the defendant from forming a new way through the disputed property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 992/2012
Case between Manmadhan M.R et al vs Balabhadra Temple Managing Committee et al regarding temple management and administration.
The plaintiffs, members of the Mannazhath family, are suing to declare their right to manage the Balabhadra Temple, claiming that a committee formed by certain individuals is unlawfully interfering with temple administration. The defendants, a managing committee, argue that the temple is owned by the blacksmith community and that the plaintiffs have no rights over it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 847/2018
Case between M.C. Antony vs The Executive Committee of Erattakulangara Bhagavathy Devaswam regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
M.C. Antony, the plaintiff, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Executive Committee of Erattakulangara Bhagavathy Devaswam, the defendant, to prevent forcible eviction from his business property. The case revolves around the claim of ownership and possession of the property by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won