Similar Cases
Based on: O.S. No.1241/2022 — Case between Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple vs R.Sukumaran Nair regarding mandatory injunction and recovery of possession
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS.No.1484/2022
Case between Kanjiravilakom Devi Temple et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal
This case involves Kanjiravilakom Devi Temple and its representatives against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was heard and subsequently dismissed as withdrawn by the court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1214/2014
Case between Madathuvilakam Ilangam Temple et al vs Rajan et al regarding settlement scheme and injunction
The plaintiffs, including the Madathuvilakam Ilangam Temple, are seeking a settlement scheme and permanent injunction against the defendants who are mismanaging the temple. The case involves disputes over the administration and enjoyment of property associated with the family temple.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1369/2023
Case between Rajan.K. vs Syamakumar et al regarding dismissal as not pressed
The plaintiff, Rajan.K., representing the Idiyadikode Bhagavathi Temple Trust, filed a suit against Syamakumar and Rajakumar, who are members of the same trust. The court ultimately dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1895/2022
Case between Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devaswom vs S.Venugopal regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves a suit filed by Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devaswom against S.Venugopal. The court rejected the plaint due to failure to remit the balance court fee.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.684/2019
Case between Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple Trust vs Government of Kerala et al regarding a civil suit
The case involves the Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple Trust as the plaintiff against the Government of Kerala and other defendants. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff during the trial.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.470/2024
Case between Chempazhanthy Asharivilakam Sree Bhadrakalimandramoorthy Temple Family Trust et al vs Kuttan Asari et al regarding dismissal for default.
The plaintiffs, represented by their Secretary Sukumaran Asari, are a temple family trust. The case involved a suit that was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the plaintiffs and lack of action to summon the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No. 90/2022
Case between Ayyappan vs Ivin Prabhu et al regarding eviction from property
Ayyappan, the petitioner, claims to be the statutory tenant of a property he uses for his scrap business. The defendants assert they purchased the property at auction and are seeking to evict him.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.309/2025
Case between Aswathy Razak M vs Habsiba regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Aswathy Razak M and Baby Latha Razak, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Habsiba and Samuel Dev. The case revolves around the eviction attempts by the defendants and obstruction of water facilities in the rented properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1951/2019
Case between University of Kerala vs The Managing Director, Kerala State Co-operative Federation for Fisherman Development Limited regarding mandatory injunction
The University of Kerala sought a mandatory injunction against the defendant, the Managing Director of Matsyafed, for vacating a stall on university property. The plaintiff claimed the defendant occupied the stall unlawfully after the expiry of their license agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1194/2025
Case between Venugopalan Nair K. vs A.M. Shanavas et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Venugopalan Nair K. filed a suit against A.M. Shanavas and others for a temporary prohibitory injunction to prevent them from trespassing on his property. The defendants are tenants of the plaintiff and have been accused of misusing the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.472/2018
Case between P.C. Samuel vs S. Xavier regarding arrears of rent and damages
P.C. Samuel, the plaintiff, rented out a building to S. Xavier, the defendant, for running a hotel. The plaintiff claimed arrears of rent and damages due to the defendant's non-payment and alleged damage to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1247/2022
Case between Sunil Kupperi vs Leela regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
Sunil Kupperi is the plaintiff claiming ownership of a property while Leela, the defendant, was a maid in the household. Sunil is seeking an order to vacate the premises as Leela has failed to leave despite requests.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.776/2020
Case between The Kerala State Federation of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Development Co-operatives Limited vs Radhika Devi. A.L regarding eviction and recovery of arrears of rent.
The Kerala State Federation of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Development Co-operatives Limited filed a suit against Radhika Devi. A.L for eviction and recovery of rent arrears. The defendant was accused of failing to pay the increased rent and execute a new rent deed after the agreement expired in 2017.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1900/2022
Case between Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devaswom et al vs Abdul Rahim@ S. Rahim regarding realization of money.
The plaintiff, a Devaswom, seeks to recover dues from the defendant, a businessman, for unpaid rent. The defendant has remained in the premises beyond the agreed lease term without paying the necessary increased rent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1428/2024
Case between K.B. Ajikumar vs Prem Rishikumaran regarding unlawful eviction
K.B. Ajikumar, the plaintiff, seeks to prevent Prem Rishikumaran, the defendant, from unlawfully evicting him from the rented building where he operates his office. The dispute arises from alleged rental arrears and the conditions surrounding a rent agreement.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.884/2020
Case between The Kerala State Fedaration of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes Development Co-operative Ltd No.4351 vs A.S Girish regarding eviction and recovery of arrears of rent
The Kerala State Federation of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Development Co-operative Ltd filed a suit against A.S Girish for eviction and recovery of arrears of rent due to non-payment. The defendant did not appear in court, leading to the case being heard ex-parte.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 458/2023
Case between Azeem Aboobaker Sait vs Leelakumari regarding arrears of rent and eviction
Azeem Aboobaker Sait, represented by his power of attorney holder Ashokan K, filed a petition against Leelakumari for eviction and recovery of arrears of rent. The respondent has not paid the rent due since January 2022, leading to the suit seeking a direction for deposit of the owed amount.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
R.C.P.No.36/2025
Case between Padma Sadasivan vs Soumya Chakkungal Simon regarding eviction and arrears of rent
Padma Sadasivan filed a petition against Soumya Chakkungal Simon for eviction due to non-payment of rent amounting to Rs.6,60,000. The court found that the counter petitioner defaulted in rent payment after September 2022 and allowed the eviction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.743/2025
Case between Asha.S. et al vs Asokan.G et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves a dispute between the plaintiffs, Asha.S and Ajithkumar, and the defendants, Asokan.G and others, concerning a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiffs are seeking to restrain the defendants from trespassing on their properties and obstructing their access to a pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1606/2024
Case between Maheen Abubacker vs D.Ambika Devi et al regarding eviction and rent agreement dispute.
The case involves Maheen Abubacker, the plaintiff, who entered a rent agreement with the defendants for a business property but is facing eviction. The defendants claim the plaintiff has not paid the agreed rent and is occupying the premises illegally.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
R.C.P.No.78/2024
Case between RS Krishna Jyothi vs Sibi Augustin regarding eviction and non-payment of rent.
The petitioner, RS Krishna Jyothi, seeks eviction of the respondent, Sibi Augustin, for non-payment of rent. The respondent failed to pay rent and did not respond to the legal notice demanding payment or vacating the premises.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.877/2017
Case between Mohanan.B vs James Fletcher regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Mohanan.B and his wife Amutha.P, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, James Fletcher, who attempted to evict them from a tea stall they have operated for years. The plaintiffs claim they have a lawful tenancy and have been paying rent regularly.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.907/2020
Case between R. Aravind vs Shaini Vijay regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
R. Aravind, a tenant, is involved in a suit against his landlord, Shaini Vijay, over the wrongful demand for eviction from a rented shop room. The plaintiff claims that the defendant is making illegal demands and threatening eviction despite the plaintiff having no rent arrears.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.147/2023
Case between Mohammed Sali vs Mammen Solomon regarding striking off pleadings and injunction.
Mohammed Sali and Mammen Solomon are involved in a case where the plaintiff, Mohammed Sali, failed to comply with a court order regarding the deposit of rent arrears. As a result, the court has dismissed the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.259/2019
Case between M/s. Spencer’s Travel Services Limited et al vs George Mathew et al regarding forceful eviction
The plaintiffs, M/s. Spencer’s Travel Services Limited and Geetha George, filed a suit against the defendants George Mathew and Mathew Fernandez for forceful eviction. The court determined that the suit was infructuous as the defendant had already obtained possession of the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 473/2016
Case between Koozhoor Bhagavathi Kshethram represented by Rakesh Venugopal vs Mazhuvannoor Grama Panchayat regarding perpetual injunction
The case involves a dispute over property rights between Koozhoor Bhagavathi Kshethram and Mazhuvannoor Grama Panchayat. The plaintiff is seeking a perpetual injunction to prevent the defendant from forming a new way through the disputed property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 23 / 2016
Case between Alias vs Kerala Kshethra Samrakshana Samithi et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction, recovery of money and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff, Alias, claims ownership of a property and seeks to prevent the defendants from encroaching upon it and to recover damages for tree removal. The defendants contest the plaintiff's ownership, claiming the property is dedicated to a deity.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.994/2022
Case between Thulaseedharan.B. vs Bindu et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
The petitioner, Thulaseedharan.B., filed a petition for a temporary prohibitory injunction against defendants Bindu and Geetha regarding an alleged trespass on his property. The case revolves around property ownership disputes and the right to construct on adjacent lands.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.138 /2019
Case between Syed Mohammed Sadik vs Suresh Babu. R.C regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.
Syed Mohammed Sadik and Suresh Babu. R.C are involved in two interconnected suits regarding property disputes over a pathway. The plaintiff claims that the defendant illegally encroached upon the pathway, reducing its width.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.549/2017
Case between Dr. Aggy. S. Valentine vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory injunction and other reliefs
The plaintiff, Dr. Aggy. S. Valentine, alleges that the defendants unlawfully demolished her compound wall and trespassed on her property. The case revolves around her request for a mandatory injunction to restore her property and prevent further unauthorized actions by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.1196/2012
Case between Aloysius E.Gomez et al vs Maglin Lobo regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Aloysius E. Gomez and his wife Mary Lobo filed a suit against Maglin Lobo regarding obstruction in a public pathway. The plaintiffs sought a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendant from constructing a roof over a portion of the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.509/2016
Case between K. Somasekhara Pillai vs Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, K. Somasekhara Pillai, is involved in a dispute over property rights with the defendants, including the Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram. He claims they unlawfully entered his property and cut down coconut trees, leading to a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.507/2014
Case between T.Sarojam et al vs Santhamma et al regarding fixation and putting up of boundary and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, T.Sarojam and others, filed a suit against the defendants, Santhamma and others, seeking to fix boundaries and prevent the defendants from trespassing on their property. The plaintiffs' predecessor had ownership of the property, but the defendants attempted to create rights over it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1236/2020
Case between Divya Kumar.P vs Peethambaran et al regarding recovery of possession and mesne profits.
Divya Kumar.P is seeking recovery of possession of her property from her parents and sister, who are currently residing there. The plaintiff contends that the defendants are in illegal possession and has filed this suit after her attempts to evict them were unsuccessful.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.242/2020
Case between Rajendran vs The City Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Rajendran, is seeking a prohibitory injunction against the City Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram to prevent them from removing a portable bunk he claims to own. The defendant contends that the installation of this bunk is illegal and the plaintiff does not have the required license.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.283/2018
Case between Nimmy Manuel et al vs Regional Head, Federal Bank Limited et al regarding declaration of title and other reliefs
The plaintiffs are the legal heirs of Sri. T.V. Manuel who died on 20/06/2010. They filed a suit to operate a locker that the deceased had with Federal Bank, which the bank denies due to a nominee claim by the third defendant.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.1003/2024
Case between Omana et al vs Sivakumar et al regarding boundary and injunction.
The plaintiffs, Omana and Shalini, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Sivakumar, Geetha Kumari, and Vasanthakumari, regarding trespass and the construction of compound walls on their property. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants have been illegally trespassing onto their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.163/2024
Case between Sarah Ann Koshy et al vs M/s Cloud 9 Apartment Owner’s Association et al regarding temporary injunction.
The plaintiffs, Sarah Ann Koshy and Sony George, are joint owners of flat No.2B in Cloud 9 Apartment and seek to prevent the defendants from obstructing their access to a terrace area. The defendants, representing the apartment owners' association, argue that the plaintiffs unlawfully trespassed into a restricted common area.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.658/2019
Case between Shaji P.R vs Rajani regarding removal of encroachment and restoration of pathway
Shaji P.R filed a suit against his sister Rajani for the removal of an encroachment and restoration of a pathway that provides access to his property. The defendant allegedly constructed a wall blocking the pathway, which the plaintiff claims has caused him hardship.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.476/2021
Case between Dayanandan vs Anila Kumari et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Dayanandan, the absolute owner of a property, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against his sisters and nephew who attempted to trespass onto his property. The court found that the plaintiff was not entitled to relief due to suppression of facts.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.972/2025
Case between Dr. Yamuna Prasad vs PRS Krishna Apartment and Commercial Space Owners Welfare Association regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Dr. Yamuna Prasad and Dr. Asha Prasad, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, the PRS Krishna Apartment and its Secretary, Sajith S. Pillai. The case involves a dispute over the operation of a clinic by the plaintiffs and the defendants' attempts to remove signage related to the clinic.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1563/2024
Case between T.S. Jayaprakash vs M/s Adrak Builders& Developers Pvt. LTD. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
T.S. Jayaprakash, the plaintiff, claims that M/s Adrak Builders& Developers Pvt. LTD. has unlawfully grabbed his property. The case involves determining the rights over certain properties and includes applications for the appointment of a commissioner and surveyor.
Civil Suit
OS. No.1276/2016
Case between Dr. Abraham George Plavelil vs S. Ambili et al regarding mandatory injunction and consequential reliefs.
The plaintiff, Dr. Abraham George Plavelil, is seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants, S. Ambili and V. Thankappan Nadar, who are occupying the plaint schedule property that he claims ownership over. The defendants allegedly obstructed the plaintiff's access to the property after the death of his father.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.2384/2014
Case between Shibu et al vs Bindhu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and other consequential reliefs.
The plaintiffs, Shibu and Sekharan, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Bindhu, Biju, and Thankamoni, concerning a dispute over property access and construction. The case also has a counterclaim where Bindhu, the plaintiff in the second suit, contends against Shibu and Sekharan regarding property declaration and injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1568/2025
Case between M.V. Pradeep kumar et al vs T.R. Bhagyalekshmi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, M.V. Pradeep kumar and V.M. Bindu, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, T.R. Bhagyalekshmi and others, regarding a sewage pipeline issue. The plaintiffs claim illegal connection of sewage lines causing potential blockage.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 923/2018
Case between Jerro Pereira et al vs Velayudhan Nair et al regarding injunction and counter claim.
This case involves a dispute between the plaintiffs, Jerro Pereira and Shyja Jerro, and the defendants, Velayudhan Nair and Indira Devi, regarding the use of a pathway and related properties. The plaintiffs claimed obstruction by the defendants over their access pathway and filed for an injunction.
Civil Suit
Partial
OS. No.93/2023
Case between Vijayan.M vs Priji Chandran regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and other consequential reliefs.
The plaintiff, Vijayan.M, purchased property from the defendant, Priji Chandran, but the defendant threatened to take possession of the property. The court proceedings were held ex parte as the defendant did not file a written statement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1897/2025
Case between Dr.Cine Supriya V.R vs State of Kerala et al regarding temporary injunction against sewage line construction.
Dr.Cine Supriya V.R is the plaintiff seeking a temporary injunction against the State of Kerala and other defendants regarding the construction of a sewage line that allegedly encroaches on her property. The court considered the balance of convenience and irreparable injury to the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won