Government

Jaseem is the plaintiff who filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of steps taken for adducing evidence.

The plaintiffs, Devadas and Ambika, filed a suit seeking a declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the attachment of properties they purchased. The defendant, Deputy Tahsildhar, opposed the suit on grounds that the sale deed was not legally valid due to prior attachments.

The plaintiffs, Devadas and Ambika, purchased properties and sought a declaration against the Deputy Tahsildhar of the Kerala Financial Corporation to prevent the auction of these properties due to earlier encumbrances. The defendants argued the sale deed was not valid and that the properties were rightfully attached for recovery of government dues.

Mallika and others filed a suit against the Kerala State seeking a declaration of ownership and a permanent injunction concerning a property. The plaintiffs claim that their father had established ownership over the property, and despite their attempts to pay the taxes, the defendants have failed to acknowledge their rights.

Shalu is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the State of Kerala and other defendants to prevent them from encroaching on her property. The case involves issues of property rights and claims of encroachment by Mr. Mohammed Shafi and government officials.

Saifudeen and Saleena Bevi filed a suit against the State of Kerala and various government officials regarding the inadequate compensation for land acquired for the widening of NH-66. They sought to prevent the demolition of structures on their property until proper valuation could be conducted.

The plaintiffs, Shamsudeen. A and Sabeena Beevi, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants for improperly acquiring their land and undervaluing the compensation. The defendants are the State of Kerala and various governmental authorities involved in the land acquisition process.

Sharafudeen filed a suit against The Kerala State and other defendants for declaration of title and possession over certain property based on adverse possession. The plaintiff sought to protect his title after the defendants attempted to take the property.

The petitioners are M.S. Krishnakumar and others, who seek to appoint an advocate commissioner for the suit. The respondents include the State of Kerala and several government officials.

The petitioner is the State of Kerala and the respondent is Kunhikannan. The case is about a matter which has already been registered earlier.