Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 149/2018

Case between Devadas et al vs Deputy Tahsildhar regarding declaration and granting a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-12-01
Duration
approximately-7 years 9 months 22 days
Case Closed
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Devadas and Ambika, purchased properties and sought a declaration against the Deputy Tahsildhar of the Kerala Financial Corporation to prevent the auction of these properties due to earlier encumbrances. The defendants argued the sale deed was not valid and that the properties were rightfully attached for recovery of government dues.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the court found it was improperly instituted due to failure to serve notice under section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court noted that the property in question was attached due to the financial liabilities of the former owners.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the court found it was improperly instituted due to failure to serve notice under section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court noted that the property in question was attached due to the financial liabilities of the former owners.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs did not serve the necessary notice to the defendant as required by law.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs did not serve the necessary notice to the defendant as required by law.
Supporting Evidence
Here, government and the public officer is the term used u/s 80 of the C.P.C. The term public officer is specifically defined u/s 2(17) of the C.P.C.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Devadas
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ambika
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Deputy Tahsildhar
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Sale deed No. 249/ 2018 dated 9/03/2018 of Kadakkavoor S.R.O, Tax receipt dated 09/1/2018, Encumbrance Certificate dated 08/03/2018 of Sub Registrar Office, Kadakkavoor.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. G. Dharma Rajan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Niyas A. Salam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Law Firm
Government Pleader

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Request for a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction against revenue recovery proceedings.
Evidence:
No order as to costs. The suit is dismissed.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Claim for declaration regarding the property.
Evidence:
No order as to costs. The suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale deed No. 249/2018 dated 09.03.2018 of Kadakkavoor S.R.O.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale deed No. 1252/1996 dated 08.08.1996 of Kadakkavoor S.R.O.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Settlement deed No. 45/2011 dated 07.01.2011, of Kadakkavoor S.R.O.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt dated 09.01.2018, Anchuthengu Village Office.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt dated 31.07.2017 of Anchuthengu Village Office.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Encumbrance certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Encumbrance Certificate dated 08.03.2018 of Sub Registrar Office, Kadakkavoor.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Encumbrance certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Encumbrance Certificate dated 08.03.2018 of Sub Registrar Office, Kadakkavoor.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Demand Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demand Notice dated 24.03.2021 of Kerala Financial Corporation.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Encumbrance certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Encumbrance Certificate dated 07.12.2024 of Sub Registrar, Kadakkavoor.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report submitted by Anchuthengu Village Officer to Tahasildhar (L.R), Chirayinkeezhu Taluk.
Reference:
Ext.X1
Document Type: Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report submitted by the Village Officer, Anchuthengu.
Reference:
Ext.X1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Devadas et al vs Deputy Tahsildhar regarding declaration and granting a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Devadas et al vs Deputy Tahsildhar regarding declaration and granting a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Fri, 03/09/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Kerala Financial Corporation

Similar Cases

Case between Muhammed Khalifa et al vs Babu regarding partition of property
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Muhammed Gasini et al vs Vaheeda Beevi regarding partition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Lipinjan et al vs Lohithan regarding property dispute
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ravi vs Ashokan et al regarding declaration and consequential permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Hussain A. regarding loan repayment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won