Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 32/2022

Case between Lipinjan et al vs Lohithan regarding property dispute

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-10-18
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Lipinjan and others, are involved in a property dispute with the defendant Lohithan. The parties settled their disputes through mediation, and the court has decreed the division of property among the plaintiffs and the defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the property to be divided among the plaintiffs and the defendant as per the mediation report. The final decree allows specific plots to be allotted to each party.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the property to be divided among the plaintiffs and the defendant as per the mediation report. The final decree allows specific plots to be allotted to each party.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties reached a lawful settlement through mediation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties reached a lawful settlement through mediation.
Supporting Evidence
The court accepted the mediation report since the terms are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is decreed and a final decree is passed as follows.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lipinjan
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lesithan
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Laila Bhai
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sumam @ Lekha
Party Age
57
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lohithan
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Remesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Sunilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Final decree passing and possession shared among parties.
Evidence:
The parties are allotted with their respective shares in the property.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
No order as to costs.
Evidence:
No order as to costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mediation Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Accepted as the terms are lawful.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Survey Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Form part of the decree.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lipinjan et al vs Lohithan regarding property dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Lipinjan et al vs Lohithan regarding property dispute

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala Taluk, Kerala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Muhammed Khalifa et al vs Babu regarding partition of property
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Muhammed Gasini et al vs Vaheeda Beevi regarding partition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ravi vs Ashokan et al regarding declaration and consequential permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Devadas et al vs Deputy Tahsildhar regarding declaration and granting a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shahida Beevi et al vs Nahas et al regarding joint compromise settlement.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won