Similar Cases
Based on: ORIGINAL SUIT No.102/2021 — Case between TP Roopesh et al vs Prameela et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 460 / 2020
Case between Shajahan TP vs Moideen P et al regarding Perpetual prohibitory injunction
The case involves Shajahan TP as the plaintiff seeking a perpetual prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The defendants were absent during the hearings.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 233/2024
Case between Snehaja PV vs Syam Sachith regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Snehaja PV filed a suit against her brother Syam Sachith seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent him from obstructing her access to their shared property. The court found that the defendant had been obstructing the plaintiff and imposed a decree in her favor.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 45/2021
Case between Premarajan K.N. vs Jiji P. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
The plaintiff, Premarajan K.N., is seeking relief against defendants Jiji P. and Anujith Ramachandran for alleged invasion of privacy through the installation of CCTV cameras. The defendants have been accused of causing the plaintiff irreparable harm by surveilling him and his family members.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 289 / 2023
Case between Geetha KP vs Ramesh Babu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Geetha KP, filed a suit against the defendants, Ramesh Babu, Valsan, Ravi, and Surendran K, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent them from trespassing on her property and committing acts of waste. The defendants had previously threatened the plaintiff and her husband while attempting to dig on the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 28/2025
Case between THARAVATTATH MARIYAM vs C. K. NASAR et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory and Mandatory Injunction
The plaintiff, Tharavattath Mariyam, seeks a permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction against the defendants who have allegedly trespassed into the plaint schedule property. The plaintiff claims that they caused damage to the Srambi building managed by the committee, which includes the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 41/2017
Case between Shiji.M vs Hassan Haji et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
Shiji.M filed a suit against Hassan Haji and others seeking a perpetual prohibitory injunction to prevent them from trespassing into her property. The case involves disputes over property rights and unauthorized construction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 174/2020
Case between Abdul Manzoor.P.P vs Edathil Balan et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Abdul Manzoor.P.P filed a suit against Edathil Balan and others for a perpetual prohibitory injunction to prevent them from changing the nature of a road that provides access to his property. The defendants were attempting to encroach upon this road, which is vital for access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 616/2019
Case between Perikkathra Surendran vs Palakurumba Gangadharan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Perikkathra Surendran, a retired civil contractor, filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants for obstructing construction on his property. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants threatened him and his son, assaulted them, and unlawfully impeded construction activities.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.226/2024
Case between Rosemary vs George regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Rosemary is the plaintiff claiming permanent prohibitory injunction against her brother George. The case revolves around the ownership and potential trespassing of the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.780/2024
Case between Muhammed Rasikh.T.P vs Abdul Razak @ Bichu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Muhammed Rasikh.T.P is the plaintiff who is claiming ownership and possession of a property, while Abdul Razak and Sareena are the defendants accused of trespassing and attempting to construct a way through the plaintiff's property. The plaintiff seeks to restrain the defendants from such actions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.92/2024
Case between K.C.Chandran et al vs Sudha et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, K.C.Chandran and B.K.Vasanthakumari, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Sudha and Akhil, to prevent them from obstructing access to their property and from damaging a water meter. The defendants have remained exparte throughout the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 141/2018
Case between Madhavi et al vs Ragini et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs Madhavi, Ajitha, Ajayan, Anitha, Ashalatha, and Amitha are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Ragini, Rahul, Rekha, and others to prevent trespass on their property. The case revolves around property rights and possession over the disputed land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 494/2023
Case between Shajimath vs Jabir et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Shajimath filed a suit against Jabir, Rashid, and Assain seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The dispute involves the defendants allegedly trespassing and threatening to demolish a pillar at the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 118/2023
Case between Adukkathil Moitheen vs Sunil Kumar. K.P, Aboobacker @ Bakker regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Adukkathil Moitheen has filed a suit against Sunil Kumar. K.P and Aboobacker @ Bakker seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff claims that the defendants illegally removed soil from his property, causing damage.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 69/2022
Case between Mohanan vs Souda. P.C et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Mohanan is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Souda. P.C and Aboobacker. The case involves a dispute over access to a pathway that the plaintiff claims is essential for reaching his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 107/2025
Case between Abdulla Sons Private Limited Company et al vs Aneesh regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves Abdulla Sons Private Limited Company and its Managing Director P.Ahammed Kutty against Aneesh regarding a dispute over property boundaries and the installation of a no parking board. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to prevent the defendant from obstructing their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.124/2024
Case between Reena,T vs Kunhi Muhammed regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves plaintiffs Reena and Aadithya who are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent forceful eviction from their leased property. The plaintiffs contend that they have received threats of eviction despite being tenants and paying rent regularly.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 658/2018
Case between Angadi Veettil Padmini vs Angadi Veettil Vasudevan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Angadi Veettil Padmini, is seeking to restrain the defendants from obstructing a pathway to her property. The defendants are relatives of the plaintiff, and the case revolves around the ownership and use of the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 592/2021
Case between Raman vs Thanka et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Raman is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Thanka and Abhinand. The defendants are allegedly attempting to claim ownership over the property of the plaintiff, leading to this legal action.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.388/2020
Case between Kalarikandy Subash Babu (died), Durga Devi, Bindya, Sandya vs Kasthuri Bai, Ramani Bai regarding partition of property.
This case involves a partition dispute over property following a preliminary decree. The plaintiffs are seeking to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to measure and divide the suit properties as decreed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 146/2017
Case between Moideen.V.P vs Pathumma et al regarding setting aside a final decree
The petitioner Moideen.V.P seeks to set aside a final decree in a partition suit due to alleged non-receipt of summons. The respondents argue that the petitioner was aware of the proceedings and failed to appear knowingly.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 114/2024
Case between Canara Bank vs M/S U.B. Hardwares regarding suit dismissal
Canara Bank filed a suit represented by its Chief Manager against M/S U.B. Hardwares and its proprietor. The case was dismissed as not pressed by the court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 152/2020
Case between Sujith K.M. vs P. Chandramathi @ Chandrika et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Sujith K.M., is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, P. Chandramathi @ Chandrika and P. Baburajan, to prevent them from trespassing into his property. The defendants are alleged to have attempted to construct a way through the plaintiff's land.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.169/2021
Case between Panakkal Mammedkoya vs Fabir et al regarding partition
The plaintiff, Panakkal Mammedkoya, is seeking a partition of family property originally belonging to his mother. The defendants, Fabir and others, have not agreed to partition despite several demands.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.224/2024
Case between Saseendran vs Sreedharan et al regarding possession of property
Saseendran initiated this suit for possession of property against Sreedharan and others. The matter was settled in mediation, resulting in a decree based on the mediation agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 255/2024
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank et al vs Dasan regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, is suing the defendant, Dasan, for non-payment of an agricultural loan amounting to Rs. 56,677. The defendant failed to repay the loan despite repeated demands, leading to the suit being filed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.301/2021
Case between M/s. Konari Enterprises vs M/s.K.M.Traders regarding return of money
The plaintiff, M/s. Konari Enterprises, is seeking to recover an amount due from the defendant, M/s.K.M.Traders, following a credit facility availed by the defendant. The defendant has failed to repay the amount despite repeated reminders and a lawyer's notice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 410/2019
Case between Sangeetha Puthiyedath vs Janardhanan @ Mani regarding mandatory injunction and damages for illegal use and occupation
The plaintiff, Sangeetha Puthiyedath, claims that the defendant, Janardhanan @ Mani, is unlawfully occupying her shop room without permission following the expiration of a license agreement. She seeks a mandatory injunction for him to vacate the premises and damages for illegal occupation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No : 449/2024
Case between Punnya Ranjith vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal
Punnya Ranjith, a minor represented by his mother, Sangeetha K., filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was dismissed by the court as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 349/2021
Case between Dayaana K. vs Marunadan Malayalee et al regarding damages and mandatory injunction.
Dayaana K. filed a suit against Marunadan Malayalee and others for damages and mandatory injunction due to the publication of a defamatory news item. The case centers around the false allegations made against Dayaana in an attempt to defame her reputation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 449/2024
Case between Punnya Ranjith vs State of Kerala, Deputy Director Education, General Convenor regarding suit dismissal
Punnya Ranjith, a minor represented by his mother Sangeetha K., filed the suit against the State of Kerala and other officials regarding a matter related to the educational event. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No : 450/2024
Case between Ishani S. Nair vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Ishani S. Nair, a minor represented by her mother Neethumol, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other educational authorities. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO :451/2024
Case between Sravan Krishna vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal.
This case involves a minor, Sravan Krishna, represented by his father, Shaji. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 494/2022
Case between M/s Calsun Finserve Pvt. Ltd. vs Shimna T.M. regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, M/s Calsun Finserve Pvt. Ltd., claims that the defendant, Shimna T.M., defaulted on a loan of Rs.10,000 taken on 22.12.2021. The plaintiff seeks recovery of the outstanding amount plus interest.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 38/2021
Case between Illath Abdul Majeed et al vs Minas Thenanchery regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, consisting of Illath Abdul Majeed and K. Balaramakurup, are the President and Secretary of Nanmanda High School Society, and they have filed a suit against Minas Thenanchery. The case involves a dispute regarding the authority of the defendant to issue notices as President of the society after resigning from the position.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No : 163/2020
Case between Chathunni vs Kozhikode District Library Council et al regarding realisation of money
Chathunni, a consulting engineer, filed a suit against the Kozhikode District Library Council and its officials for unpaid supervision and estimate charges related to renovation work at the Mananchira Central Library. He claims to have been entitled to a higher payment for his services but was only compensated partially.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 181/2024
Case between State Bank of India, Narikkuni Branch et al vs Harikrishnan U.K., Vijayan U.K. regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff bank is seeking to recover an outstanding loan amount from the defendants who failed to make repayments as agreed. The case was uncontested as the defendants did not appear in court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 265/2024
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sumina C.K. et al regarding realisation of money
The case involves Kerala Gramin Bank seeking repayment of a loan amount from the defendants, Sumina C.K. and Beegum Masna, who took out an educational loan but failed to repay it. The bank claims the defendants owe Rs. 2,60,911 with accrued interest.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 508/2022
Case between Dileep Kumar vs Sunil kumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Dileep Kumar filed a suit against Sunil Kumar for a permanent prohibitory injunction concerning a property dispute. The case involves issues of shared property rights and unlawful attempts to access a well.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 564/2023
Case between Arabhi et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissed for default.
The plaintiffs, who are minors represented by a next friend, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff did not adduce any evidence and the relief sought had become infructuous.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 588/2018
Case between V. Doraswami vs T. Rajeev et al regarding permanent perpetual prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, V. Doraswami, is involved in a case against the defendants, T. Rajeev and K.S. Ashraf Ali, concerning a dispute over access to a property owned by the plaintiff. The plaintiff is seeking an injunction to prevent the defendants from trespassing and obstructing access to the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.17/2022
Case between Mandattil Bhaskaran vs Mekoth Parambil Vineesh regarding declaration of a false and fabricated settlement deed.
The plaintiff, Mandattil Bhaskaran, alleges that he was misled by the defendant, Mekoth Parambil Vineesh, into signing a settlement deed under false pretenses. The plaintiff seeks to declare this deed invalid and prevent the defendant from taking possession of the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 355/2024
Case between Kasthurba Mahila Samajam vs Dhanyasree K. regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiff, a registered society, seeks a mandatory injunction against the defendant for failing to vacate a premises. The defendant has significant arrears in license fees and has been directed to vacate the premises.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 355/2024
Case between Kasthurba Mahila Samajam vs Dhanyasree K. regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiff, Kasthurba Mahila Samajam, is seeking a mandatory injunction to evict the defendant, Dhanyasree K., from the premises due to unpaid arrears of license fees. The defendant was absent in court, and the case proceeded ex-parte.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.531/2015
Case between P.Premi et al vs M.Rijeesh et al regarding recovery of possession and consequential injunction.
The plaintiffs, P.Premi and Sunila, seek recovery of possession and a mandatory injunction against the defendants, M.Rijeesh and others, who have allegedly encroached upon their property. The court found that the defendants had constructed structures on the plaintiffs' land without permission.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.08/2022
Case between Bineesh vs Thekkedath Sreenivasan Nair et al regarding declaration of right and injunction.
The plaintiff, Bineesh, filed a suit against Thekkedath Sreenivasan Nair and others regarding access to a pathway serving his property. The defendants were absent during the hearing and raised claims over the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.225/2021
Case between Chandrasekharan vs Pankajam, Radhakrishnan regarding partition.
The plaintiffs are Chandrasekharan, and the defendants are Pankajam and Radhakrishnan. The case concerns a partition of property.
Civil Suit
Original Suit No. 194/2021
Case between Muhammed vs Abdul Rahiman et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Muhammed is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Abdul Rahiman and Ameer, regarding access to property. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property which the defendants allegedly entered and used without permission.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won