Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 69/2022

Case between Mohanan vs Souda. P.C et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Savitha T.P
Order Date
2025-07-21
Duration
approximately-3 years 5 months
Case Closed
Mon, 07/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mohanan is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Souda. P.C and Aboobacker. The case involves a dispute over access to a pathway that the plaintiff claims is essential for reaching his property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, restraining the defendants from trespassing and dumping waste on the plaintiff's property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants and their men are restrained from trespassing into the plaint B schedule property in any manner or tampering with the boundaries.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit, restraining the defendants from trespassing and dumping waste on the plaintiff's property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved from the affidavit and evidence submitted.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved from the affidavit and evidence submitted.
Supporting Evidence
Nothing before this court to disbelieve the evidence put forth by the plaintiff. Hence it is necessary to pass an order of injunction to restrain the highhanded acts of defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1The defendants and their men are restrained from trespassing into the plaint B schedule property in any manner or tampering with the boundaries or reducing the existing width as mentioned in the plaint B schedule property in any manner.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mohanan
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Souda. P.C
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aboobacker
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Janmam Assignment Deed No. 1207/2020, Certificate issued from Kunnamangalam Co-Operative Rural Bank, Copy of Commission Report in OS. 6/1996, Copy of Judgment in OS. 6/1996 of Additional Munsiff Court- II,Kozhikode.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. T.K. Shibu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.P. Basheer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are restrained from trespassing into plaint B schedule property and making impediments.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: The defendants and their men are restrained from trespassing into the plaint B schedule property in any manner or tampering with the boundaries.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are restrained from dumping waste or making impediments on the plaint B schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendants and their men are restrained from dumping any waste, stones, or filthy soil on the plaint B schedule property or making any impediments in any manner for the peaceful use of the plaint B schedule pathway by the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves ownership of plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the pathway access to the plaint B schedule property.
Reference:
Exts.A2 to A6
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Details previous judgment relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Records the complaint made by the plaintiff against the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents another complaint filed by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the complaint was received by police authorities.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Photos
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Visual evidence supporting plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Exts.A11(a) to A11(f)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mohanan vs Souda. P.C et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Mohanan vs Souda. P.C et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Wed, 02/16/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 07/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Muhammed Rasikh.T.P vs Abdul Razak @ Bichu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rosemary vs George regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Additional Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Perikkathra Surendran vs Palakurumba Gangadharan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Abdul Manzoor.P.P vs Edathil Balan et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shiji.M vs Hassan Haji et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Defendant Won