Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 174/2020

Case between Abdul Manzoor.P.P vs Edathil Balan et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction

Court
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Judge
Smt. Jomy Anu Isaac
Order Date
2025-01-30
Duration
approximately-4 years
Case Closed
Thu, 01/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Manzoor.P.P filed a suit against Edathil Balan and others for a perpetual prohibitory injunction to prevent them from changing the nature of a road that provides access to his property. The defendants were attempting to encroach upon this road, which is vital for access.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent them from encroaching on the road and obstructing access to the plaintiff's property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent them from encroaching on the road and obstructing access to the plaintiff's property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence demonstrated apprehension of obstruction to property access.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence demonstrated apprehension of obstruction to property access.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff would prove the apprehension of the plaintiff. Hence, he is entitled to get a decree for injunction as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: Defendants are hereby permanently restrained by a decree for permanent prohibitory injunction from restraining the defendants and their men from changing the nature of plaint B schedule road committing waste in the plaint B schedule road and from annexing the plaint B schedule road to the property of the defendants by reducing its width and from obstructing its motorable access.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Manzoor.P.P
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Edathil Balan
Party Age
80
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chandni Rani
Party Age
47
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ranjini
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajesh
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramesh @ Bosh
Party Age
32
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of partition deed No. 2046/2008, Copy of ozhimuri deed No. 2544/2013, Certificate from the Kozhikode District Co-operative Bank Limited, Copy of land tax receipt from Village Officer, Copy of complaint filed before SHO, Kasaba
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K. Mujeeb Rahman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.R. Jishara
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Dilkush.V.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Benazeera.K.P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are permanently restrained from changing the nature of plaint B schedule road.
Evidence:
Hence, he is entitled to get a decree for injunction as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the ownership and possession of the plaintiff in plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Ozhimuri deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows ownership and possession details of the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides evidence of plaintiff's financial status related to the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of the plaintiff maintaining tax obligations related to plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the complaint filed regarding encroachment of the plaint B schedule road.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Confirms the condition and width details of the plaint B schedule road.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between Abdul Manzoor.P.P vs Edathil Balan et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Manzoor.P.P vs Edathil Balan et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Thu, 01/30/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 01/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Raman vs Thanka et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Abdulla Sons Private Limited Company et al vs Aneesh regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Adukkathil Moitheen vs Sunil Kumar. K.P, Aboobacker @ Bakker regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Madhavi et al vs Ragini et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.C.Chandran et al vs Sudha et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won